GTA:SA question

Slacker

Newbie
Joined
Jun 22, 2006
Messages
1,698
Reaction score
0
What missions do I have to do in Los Santos to get to San Fierro?

Because quite frankly, this city blows.
 
Most every single one.

Sorry. San Fierro isn't much better.

Las Venturas is the best.
 
Do I have to do the one where I taxi that "OG" (god I love this game's sterotypical enforcings) around on a motorcycle while he chases after that mexican who ripped him off? Cause I was literally seconds away from beating it and failed it today, and I don't really have the drive to give it another shot.
 
You have to do all the main story missions. Which are awesome and only get more awesome.
 
I always thought Los Santos was the best city. San Fierro was too concentrated in that dockyard area, and Las Venturas was too spread-out and flat.
 
Los Santos could've been an awesome city. Unfortunately they chose to focus on that gangster rap bullshit instead of the movie industry, which would've been far more entertaining. I hope they come out with SA Stories that uses that map for a much better storyline. With such great a great setting and gameplay, the whole game felt like such wasted potential because of the stupid characters/story. I still prefer Vice City and GTA3 to it.

CJ would've been a better character for a city like Detroit. Although he fit in fine in the ghetto areas of LS his character just didn't work in SF and LV.
 
I always thought Los Santos was the best city. San Fierro was too concentrated in that dockyard area, and Las Venturas was too spread-out and flat.

It's fun to explore, but all of the missions take place in the same general, small, compacted area, and they're all "hey, just do drive-by shootings!" I wouldn't mind so much if they encouraged you to open the horizons for where the missions took place. It's the same problem I had with Vice City's missions.

Isn't San Fierro the replica of San Fransisco, essentially? I can't imagine myself disliking that.
 
in my opinion the coolest city was the one of the 3
 
The business district of Liberty City was the best. I remember pulling wicked stunts on a divider near the yakuza territory.
 
I think San Andreas was too spread-out. Rockstar went too far with the "big world" concept and didn't have enough mission content to fill it up. It's really a shame, because more missions would have helped flesh out the cities more.

I hope GTA IV fixes that problem. Is 500 missions too much of a pipe-dream?
 
I think San Andreas was too spread-out. Rockstar went too far with the "big world" concept and didn't have enough mission content to fill it up. It's really a shame, because more missions would have helped flesh out the cities more.

I hope GTA IV fixes that problem. Is 500 missions too much of a pipe-dream?

Have ANY details for GTA IV even been released yet?
 
Bummer. I'd really like to see how Rockstar can expand on the franchise.
 
Have ANY details for GTA IV even been released yet?
There will be episodes released shortly after release(will be free downloads from XBLM - PS3 version will have episodes as well) that will expand on the game somehow, but Rockstar North haven't revealed how.

Other then that and a release date, nothing. ^^
 
I loved San Fierro... but then, I've never seen San Fran. So yeah.
 
Verdant Meadows airfield and the adjacent military base. I generally loved the desert and just cruising around.

Besides, nothing beats getting a Harrier and screwing things up :D
 
I actually don't mind Los Santos, or the missions. Some of them blow, but hey, it's a GTA game, Rockstar have never had total quality control.
 
I hope in the next gta the cities to be bigger,I dont know nothing about urbanisn but IMO the cities are too small to be considered big cities
 
I'd like the next GTA to add more realism to the way police work. e.g. driving on the pavements or speeding will get you a mild fine and a slap on the wrist. Like Mafia.
And maybe, depending on how much money you have to spare, the severity of the punishment. If you have only a little you'll be chucked in jail and be forced to break out, or stay in there where there could be some missions. If you have a fair bit you can hire a lawyer, the more money, the better they are which can reduce the punishment. And if you have loads and loads you can just bribe the police. I dunno how annoying that would get.

I'd also like mouse aiming for drive by shootings on the PC version. I hate drive bys otherwise.
 
Heh, that would actually be really annoying, Reginald :P

GTA really does need better AI, but I'm sure Rockstar was just held back by the PS2 hardware, so we'll be okay this generation.
 
I hope they dont give out tickets for speeding etc ...I spend half the time driving on the side walk


they should do a yakuza game, GTA:Tokyo, it practically screams for the gta treatment
 
I hope they dont give out tickets for speeding etc ...I spend half the time driving on the side walk


they should do a yakuza game, GTA:Tokyo, it practically screams for the gta treatment

I think should go whit "zero style",not like in sa where the main theme is hip hop or vc where the theme was the 80's (but honestly I liked the seting,it was original cuz I didnt knew too much of that age)the next should be more balanced and depending on what you do the style change more of something like that

thats why the 3 is cooler that the others cuz it hav all these diferent styles
 
That's only because the late 90's specifically didn't have style :P
 
Back
Top