Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Wildhound said:Well that's reassuring. With all the complaining going on I was starting to wonder if maybe I was the only one that thought it was fantastic. It seems though that there's just certain bits that people are nitpicking while loving it on the whole.
Acert93 said:What to vote.
I paused before voting.
Memories of Zelda: OoT came to mind--for its time, ZOot really just slapped the competition down. The polish, the "ripe" fullness of the game. In an odd way it was like the total refinement of a genre, yet it also was one of the first 3D Action RPGs. You expect a game like ZOoT to be a the last game in a technical series--not the first. Zelda, like HL2, was its own world.
And then there is GoldenEye, yet another game for the N64. While not as shiny as top teir FPS of today, the features and story still hold their own. Not much had really changed for the positive in FPS since the days of Quake/Duke Nukem/HL/GoldenEye, and GoldenEye is an example of a good (and fairly difficult) FPS with a story with an excellent multiplayer. I wasted years playing MP in this game. I would get new games and they would stink, so my friends would and I would all go back to GE. This happened until Conker's. Nothing on the consoles really touched GoldenEye.
You also have such great games like the original HL--which was stellar. And oh, it had little things like TFC (my favorite), Natural Selection, and a little mod called Counter Strike. The PC has had some great titles of the years (Starcraft and almost anything made by the old Blizzard come to mind).
And I must not forget titles like Madden. 2005 is testiment to refinement in gameplay. I was sad when Dynamix dropped the FPS Football series, but Madden after all these years has finally reached that platform in features and has gameplay in spades.
Recently there have been some very addictive games like Battlefield 1942 and its mods (which I play to death) that have really taken off (BF1942 sold over 4 million copies on the PC ALONE).
But, if we all honestly look back, while these games were groundbreaking in their time, we do look on them with some hefty nastolgia.
HL2 is not perfect (no game is "perfect"), but the total package it delivers, in my opinion, was perfect in comparison to what it measures up against. FarCry, Doom 3, Splinter Cell, BF1942, all great in their own ways, just are not even in the same league.
HL2 is not revolutionary in the way most games are. You cannot say, "HL2 has a unified lighting system with all dynamic lights and dynamic shadows". You cannot say HL2 tells a great story--it does not have a story even in the traditional sense. But HL2 IS a story--HL2 is about an experience that IS a story. HL2 pulls you into Gordon and holds tight and never lets go. The story is there, but in a new way--you there, lost in the middle of it, LIVING the story.
We can nick pick little things, but HL2 does so many things so well it just gels. It is a beginning of a new way of thinking about how a FPS evolves and expresses itself.
And I doubt HL2 will be matched in full for many, many, many years. I would put money that HL3 will be the only game in the next 2 years to do all HL2 does.
And for those reasons, nostalgia aside, I think HL2 is the best game ever. A game has never made me "feel" for the world and players in the game, and no game has told a story where I did not feel like a viewer looking at a game, but feeling LIKE the center of the game. It sucked me in and never let go--and for that I think HL2 is the best game I have ever played. It may not have the replay value (I bet it will be around a long time with mods... but we will see) of BF1942 right now, but the ride is like no other.
Rafa 5.0 said:So... what happens after HL3???
We all just kill ourselves??