Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Beazil said:Really sucks that they would put spoilers in the review. Kinda defeats the purpose of playing the game.
MadHatter said:It's shitty journalism and irresponsible.
Naveed said:It was posted many days ago, even on the main page, in the news.
MadHatter said:It's shitty journalism, irresponsible, and apathetic on their part. Also, they're probably thinking that if they put spoilers in their mag, more people will buy their mag.
Chiefi said:I must have missed it. :x
MadHatter said:It's shitty journalism, irresponsible, and apathetic on their part. Also, they're probably thinking that if they put spoilers in their mag, more people will buy their mag.
Aknot said:Great business practice though. I mean they are in the BUSINESS to make money. If enough people buy it they have done what they have set out to do.
There are other people different from you believe it or not.
Feath said:"There's a gun that fires squirrels in the game".
MadHatter said:No, a review's purpose is to rate a product to give the consumer a basic idea of the quality of the product. Since when have reviewers and editors alike become Mothergoose and tell you the stories or plot segments? It's like going to the movies and you watch the beginning trailers for other films; one of the trailers gives away key plot segments. That's NOT what they're suppose to do. Same goes for movie reviews.
Aknot said:Depends on where you look. Did the article tell you "spoilers" ahead? If so well you (the reader) knew ahead of time. While you do not like it, it bothers me not. Its not the "story" its how you get through the story.
Can you honestly tell me you have never read a book and then saw the movie? Why? The book ruined/spoiled it for you. Same thing here you liked the story/book well enough to see the movie, you like the game well enough that the story (while important) will still be just as fresh once you "act" it out.
MadHatter said:Since when have reviews been about revealing spoilers to the reader? It is the mag / editor's responsibility to keep the article informative and not spoil something for the readers. Like I mentioned earlier, what happens if every movie, game, or book review begins to present spoilers in their compositions?
So every movie is based on a book? This is irrelevant. A book is a book; it's a final product that's not suppose to provide a review or any type of spoilers for a movie.
Aknot said:Most if not all of those pictures could have 3 or 4 "story" lines behind them.
Aknot said:Easy answer to: "what happens if every movie, game, or book review begins to present spoilers in their compositions?"
Dont read/watch/listen to it.
As for the book thing you missed my point. Lets take Lord of the Rings. Do you know how many people have read that book series. Do you know how many people read the book BEFORE watching the movie? Seem to have not "ruined" the success of the movie though. Did you read the story prior to seeing the movie? Why? (unless of course it was like me MANY years ago, yet I dusted them off ad read them again as others did)
It will only "spoil" as much as you let it. Ever seen a movie twice? Read a book twice?
Again for the review IF they said (please someone let me know who can read that) SPOILERS ahead there is no one to "blame" but the person who read it. Dont shoot the messenger.
Aknot said:Dont read/watch/listen to it.
MadHatter said:And yeah, sometimes it's not painful seeing a movie that's been spoiled previously by a game or book. I usually don't mind. But sometimes I enjoy something original and clean.
Aknot said:So you avoid it. Im just saying its no ones place to say:
"It's shitty journalism, irresponsible, and apathetic on their part."
Because SOMEONE out there obviously does not mind it. That would be like saying (stretch here) you dont like seafood so no one else should be able to eat it.
Again IF they did not say "Spoilers ahead" then you have reason to be a little upset but then you would have (others not "you" in general) stopped reading after the 1st sign of spoilers.
As for the pictures, a picture is worth a 1000 words and there is no spoilers in those pictures unless you know MORE about the plot/story already.
MadHatter said:It is shitty journalism and irresponsible on their part. They're redifining what a review is for whatever reasons they may have. But, like I said, not much can be done, or is being done, about it at the moment.
azz0r said:Link? I cant find it
azz0r said:Link? I cant find it