Happy Slapper Owned

Man, that guy got dropped hard. Those accents - super thick! I could barely understand them.
 
Some sick responses to a man who may have died.
 
kaf11 said:
Some sick responses to a man who may have died.

I laughed my ass off.

Granted, I DID feel bad about it (first time I saw that in slow mo I kinda shat my pants and was was stunned), but after it played a few times over and over and over I started laughing.

I agree, if he did live, he got what he deserved. If he died, then may his writhing soul rest in peace.
 
I didn't find it funny in the slightest.
 
el Chi said:
el Chi gives the anti-slapper his seal of irony approval. "Happy slappers" are proper scumbags.
Vent begins: the Daily Record is a big pile of shite. Any publication that feels it can use "ned" as a genuine descriptive term (for those of you out of the loop, "ned" = Non-Educated Delinquent") needs a good hard f*cking slap. F*ck 'em.
/Frustrated journalist rant ends.

:O I really did think his name was ned
 
Ennui said:
that car video is ****ed up and i'm disgusted that some of you have the nerve to laugh about it

he's dead.

Funny thing some of the people that say he deserved it, are probably the ones like Nat Turner "molestation is just penetration, not a crime LOL":rolleyes:
 
AzzMan said:
Funny thing some of the people that say he deserved it, are probably the ones like Nat Turner "molestation is just penetration, not a crime LOL":rolleyes:

Well, as I said, it really depends.

If he dies, then i'm shocked and hope the best for his family.

If he's just a disfigured vegetable, then i'd say he got what he had comming.

Really though, it looked like he was slappin some little kids who were biking. THAT is wrong.

But however wrong, I suppose doesn't warrant death.
 
The second one was horrible, especially how they replayed it. If that was his friends that put that up...

The first one was just funny.
 
Well good, he got what he deserved. The first guy I mean.
 
MiccyNarc said:
Awww! Look who is acting all self righteous! It's really cute.:bounce:
Yes, someone stating that they didn't find the mocking of severe pain inflicted on someone else even remotely funny - that person's obviously gotta be extremely conceited and sanctimonious. The bastard.
 
I think i agree with ShortRecoil here, you **** around and you risk getting your face smashed in by a car.
 
Wow. I agree with the first one. This is such a stupid phenomenon and hopefully stuff like this will make others think twice about getting involved.

I also hope the second one maybe gets out to kids the message that acting like an idiot can get you really close to dead in no time. Good thing he lived, but what a hard way to learn such a simple lesson....
 
Tbh if someone does something stupid and gets hurt...tough shit. If they hadnt done anything theyd still be alright.

He didnt die, so pfft.
 
This is a phenomenon i absolutely despise so frankly i couldn't care less about either of the happy slappers in these vids, regardless of what happened to them.

Just a thought... but how would you all feel about the second 'happy slapper' and his self-inflicted 'accident' if he'd caused injury (say for example a broken bone), or worse, to one of the kids he was trying to hit?
 
the guy in the second video deserved what he got ..hold on sec, not morally but logically ...he knew engaging in a behaviour could result in one of x number of possibilities ..by commiting himself to the behaviour he entered into that world of possible outcomes ..unforetunately for him he received the second worst case scenario possible outcome. Gun ownership is a good example ..if you dont own a gun you have 0% chance of shooting yourself ..if however you do own a gun the chances of shooting yourself are no longer 0 as that possibility has entered the equation

doesnt mean I think the punishment fit the crime
 
el Chi said:
Yes, someone stating that they didn't find the mocking of severe pain inflicted on someone else even remotely funny - that person's obviously gotta be extremely conceited and sanctimonious. The bastard.
You don't honestly believe that he cares, do you? It's some random idiot being a jerk and gets owned because of it. What's not to laugh at?

Now if it was a little baby that fell out a window and got hit by a car, then I'd be outraged. This guy got what was coming to him (In case you didn't notice, he was trying to knock little kids off their bikes with his car door)
 
MiccyNarc said:
You don't honestly believe that he cares, do you? It's some random idiot being a jerk and gets owned because of it. What's not to laugh at?

Now if it was a little baby that fell out a window and got hit by a car, then I'd be outraged. This guy got what was coming to him (In case you didn't notice, he was trying to knock little kids off their bikes with his car door)
Like I've already said - I don't think he was a good guy, I don't think what he was doing was defensible but I definitely don't think it was funny, or that it was ok to put a video like that on the internet like it was entertainment. That's not right.
But I doubt we're going to come to any kind of compromise here, so let's just leave it.
 
So by this logic I should go on a shooting spree killing everyone I despise and film it, I mean the assholes knew they had it coming when they pissed me off right? If you think morally he got what he deserved, I think the middle east would suit you quite well...
 
Ennui said:
that car video is ****ed up and i'm disgusted that some of you have the nerve to laugh about it

he's dead.

Not the first time is it though, "lolol he died, funnies!"
 
I know he's not dead but I hate how self righteous some people get. I'll say it now and I'll say it again- if I die in a slightly funny manner and there's a vid you CAN and SHOULD laugh at the funniness. Please don't laugh at the fact that I AM dead but if the act is funny go ahead. Just not like in front of a close friend or something of mine. Got it? Good.

I'm fairly sure most people feel the same way so when something is funny and you laugh, it isn't SICK, etc.
 
RakuraiTenjin said:
I know he's not dead but I hate how self righteous some people get. I'll say it now and I'll say it again- if I die in a slightly funny manner and there's a vid you CAN and SHOULD laugh at the funniness. Please don't laugh at the fact that I AM dead but if the act is funny go ahead. Just not like in front of a close friend or something of mine. Got it? Good.

I'm fairly sure most people feel the same way so when something is funny and you laugh, it isn't SICK, etc.

Well there's a difference. It wasn't funny, at least not to me. There's nothing self righteous about it. I don't find mutilation funny.

What do you think about ogrish and rotten? People find that stuff funny. Do you? I mean, even if the person didn't die... instead it was like a kid who got their arm mangled by a machine(which i've heard they have that and more sickening stuff there)... they laugh at it, would you? Or would you be self righteous because you didn't think it was funny?
 
In the second vid, I think those kids on the bikes were his friends anyways and they were all just ****ing around. Now if the guy in the first video had gotten mangled or killed when he tried that shit, I probably would think it was funny. Probably would have had to make a PWN3D picture out of it too :D
 
Raziaar said:
Well there's a difference. It wasn't funny, at least not to me. There's nothing self righteous about it. I don't find mutilation funny.

What do you think about ogrish and rotten? People find that stuff funny. Do you? I mean, even if the person didn't die... instead it was like a kid who got their arm mangled by a machine(which i've heard they have that and more sickening stuff there)... they laugh at it, would you? Or would you be self righteous because you didn't think it was funny?
If it was a funny situation then I would laugh. The kid's arm in the meatgrinder was more of a "WTF? How?" rather than disgust or pity. I mean you have to be pretty ****ing stupid to crank it as far as he did (it was a manual arm crank one, and the kid was like 13)

Let's say I die in a crash with a clown car. Or if a proctologist was killed by a projectile piece of fecal matter from a patient's ass. Something outrageous or sort of deserved usually is humerous to other people (in the sense CptStern described. He took the chance and it happened, it's like trapese without a safety harness)
 
RakuraiTenjin said:
If it was a funny situation then I would laugh. The kid's arm in the meatgrinder was more of a "WTF? How?" rather than disgust or pity. I mean you have to be pretty ****ing stupid to crank it as far as he did (it was a manual arm crank one, and the kid was like 13)

Let's say I die in a crash with a clown car. Or if a proctologist was killed by a projectile piece of fecal matter from a patient's ass. Something outrageous or sort of deserved usually is humerous to other people (in the sense CptStern described. He took the chance and it happened, it's like trapese without a safety harness)


Those are far stretches from leaning out of a car and having your face crushed in by a parked/oncoming vehicle.

Sorry, but I have no respect for people who visit Ogrish/Rotten.
 
Raziaar said:
Those are far stretches from leaning out of a car and having your face crushed in by a parked/oncoming vehicle.

Sorry, but I have no respect for people who visit Ogrish/Rotten.
While 90% of the stuff on there is just purely for snuff purposes, there is a LOT of material that is important to see/puts things in perspective or lets you see real stories of things that happened. For example: war footage, etc. News generally doesn't broadcast a lot of things.
 
Raziaar said:
Those are far stretches from leaning out of a car and having your face crushed in by a parked/oncoming vehicle.

Sorry, but I have no respect for people who visit Ogrish/Rotten.
He didnt have his face crushed in ffs, no blood, he survived...whats the problem?
 
1st kid got what he deserved, 2nd kid got more than he deserved but thank god it was only a parked car. Still both kids are dickheads. 1st one is just an utter ****.

I laughed at the first video because that guy deserved to be knocked the **** out. The 2nd one i was pretty shocked at first and felt sorry for the kid, until i realised it was a parked car. Now i just think he's a ****ing moron who should've known shit like that can happen when your leaning out of a car window/door.
 
Llama said:
He didnt have his face crushed in ffs, no blood, he survived...whats the problem?

People survive horrible things all the time. Bombs go off in countries around the world, people survive them... not really funny. Though I bet you there are people who laugh!
 
I did not realise the car was parked, i thought he just got ****ing owned.
 
RakuraiTenjin said:
If it was a funny situation then I would laugh. The kid's arm in the meatgrinder was more of a "WTF? How?" rather than disgust or pity. I mean you have to be pretty ****ing stupid to crank it as far as he did (it was a manual arm crank one, and the kid was like 13)

Let's say I die in a crash with a clown car. Or if a proctologist was killed by a projectile piece of fecal matter from a patient's ass. Something outrageous or sort of deserved usually is humerous to other people (in the sense CptStern described. He took the chance and it happened, it's like trapese without a safety harness)

You need to show respect though laughing is not the way
 
RakuraiTenjin said:
While 90% of the stuff on there is just purely for snuff purposes, there is a LOT of material that is important to see/puts things in perspective or lets you see real stories of things that happened. For example: war footage, etc. News generally doesn't broadcast a lot of things.

I dont need to see images/video of soldiers/civilians/combatants getting various limbs blown off to understand what's happening in iraq. Those types of sites are for shock value alone because you can find as much information by just skimming headlines. For the most part they have a clear cut agenda and a POV to push. Ogrish, for example, mostly posts videos of beheadings/terrorist attacks, they seldom if ever post similiar videos involving atrocities commited by coalition troops. It's distictly one sided and isnt a very good source for news
 
CptStern said:
For the most part they have a clear cut agenda and a POV to push. Ogrish, for example, mostly posts videos of beheadings/terrorist attacks,they seldom if ever post similiar videos involving atrocities commited by coalition troops. It's distictly one sided and isnt a very good source for news

I like my videos and pictures of people getting killed and harmed in horrible ways unbiased too. If I didn't feel sick everytime I saw the disgusting political bias that goes on at ogrish I might go to that site more often for my news.
 
Sainku said:
I like my videos and pictures of people getting killed and harmed in horrible ways unbiased too. If I didn't feel sick everytime I saw the disgusting political bias that goes on at ogrish I might go to that site more often for my news.


nice attempt at twisting my words

I was specifically answering this:

RakuraiTenjin said:
For example: war footage, etc. News generally doesn't broadcast a lot of things.

CptStern said:
I dont need to see images/video of soldiers/civilians/combatants getting various limbs blown off to understand what's happening in iraq.[PERIOD]


CptStern said:
Those types of sites are for shock value alone because you can find as much information by just skimming headlines.[PERIOD]


how/why did you twist it to mean this? when I clearly say I dont need to see that kind of imagery ..or are you just an ass with an axe to grind?


Sainku said:
I like my videos and pictures of people getting killed and harmed in horrible ways unbiased too.
 
HOLY CRAP!!! That Kid Didnt die WOW !! Its like getting hit in the face by a pie .... but multiply it by 1 million .
 
how/why did you twist it to mean this? when I clearly say I dont need to see that kind of imagery ..or are you just an ass with an axe to grind?

Because thats exactly what that site is. Pictures and videos of people being killed in horrible ways. Who the hell cares if it is biased or not a valid news source? Of course it isn't a valid news source for the war. Of course it is for shock value. It is a snuff video site. I took out the rest of your post because it is irrelevant and not what I was replying to.The accusation that a snuff site is biased and that this makes it an invalid news source was entirely retarded to me so I made a sarcastic post about it. And that is why the accusation is the only text included in my reply. I didn't twist anything. Maybe I just completely misunderstood what you where trying to say. If that is the case, I apologize.

I guess what i am trying to say is...even if it was an unbiased snuff video website, it is still a snuff video website. It wouldn't ever be a valid source for news.
 
Sainku said:
Because thats exactly what that site is. Pictures and videos of people being killed in horrible ways. Who the hell cares if it is biased or not a valid news source? Of course it isn't a valid news source for the war. Of course it is for shock value. It is a snuff video site.

? did you read my post? did you read Rakurai's post? Rakurai posted that it was a good source of information for news that's not on mainstream sites and I posted they were not valid because it's one sided and is meant more to shock then to inform ........it's almost as if you didnt read any of our posts, you're repeating exactly what I was saying about the shock aspect ..so what's the problem?

Sainku said:
I took out the rest of your post because it is irrelevant and not what I was replying to.

no you took it out because it is directly related to what you were saying

Sainku said:
The accusation that a snuff site is biased and that this makes it an invalid news source was entirely retarded to me so I made a sarcastic post about it.

well you obviously didnt understand, and after further attempts at clarifying it, you still dont understand ..I wasnt saying that a news source isnt valid because it should "snuff" ..not even close. I was saying it's not valid because it doesnt report anything, it's just a video without any journalistic analysis



Sainku said:
And that is why the accusation is the only text included in my reply. I didn't twist anything. Maybe I just completely misunderstood what you where trying to say. If that is the case, I apologize.

I accept that it could have been a misunderstanding but I thought I was being clear when I said I didnt need to see disturbing imagery in order to understand the war

Sainku said:
I guess what i am trying to say is...even if it was an unbiased snuff video website, it is still a snuff video website. It wouldn't ever be a valid source for news.


which was my point all along
 
Back
Top