Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
xLostx said:harry potter ftl, so gay
StardogChampion said:If you're over 16 and want to go see Harry Potter, then you need your head examined.
Watch better movies and read better books, please. Thanks.
StardogChampion said:If you're over 16 and want to go see Harry Potter, then you need your head examined.
nofx said:i just saw it, well it was in my opinion a bit better than the third. theres no holes really in the movie and it comes to together in the end.
i just wished they were more quidditch scenes, and more evil things to battle.
its a solid movie and it will SCARE you
the durmstang/and the other visiting school entrance is a must see its seems so cultish
and this movie begins out really dark and carries the same dark atmoshpere if you read the book, the movie moves rapidly.
I like the books(I think Harry's a bit of an asshole in the latest 2 though) but I hate the films.Fliko said:This is gonna be the best movie, gonna watch it a week after it comes out.
I shun those who shun Harry Potter and never read the books, or watched it.
"Its about a Wizard School. Oh! Has the word Wizard, I'm to mature for it." How much times have I heard that comment.
If you watched it, or read the books, didn't like it, well, thats your opinion, I think it is cool though.
Sulkdodds said:It was quite good. Ron only did his stupid mugging once in the entire thing and it got the funny/serious mix down pat. But does anyone else think that Harry Potter is suited far better to a TV series like Lost than a film? Think about it. Each book spans an entire year at Hogwarts, which is pretty long, and is basically a series of self-contained 'events' which all link to each other. Instead of films it should be a TV show - Series one = book one, Series 2 = book 2, etc.
Eh? Eh?
EDIT: Anyone else notice that Radcliffe's acting seemed to improve literally as the film went on?
Sulkdodds said:EDIT: Anyone else notice that Radcliffe's acting seemed to improve literally as the film went on?
Sulkdodds said:EDIT: Anyone else notice that Radcliffe's acting seemed to improve literally as the film went on?
I bet they've got armpits like my legs underneath those shiny blue dressesIonizeMyAtoms said:As someone who's never seen a Harry Potter movie or read a Harry Potter book, I thought it was very obvious that things were cut. Eveything just went by so fast. As a stand alone movie, it was alright, better than I thought it would be, but I definitely won't be watching it again
Oh, and those French girls? GOD DAMN.
Books > movies.Ren.182 said:I enjoyed the first 3 movies... will enjoy this one. Except this time i'll be seeing it with my girlfriend
I haven't read the books. I may do one day. But as movies i think they're awesome.
TheBleeding said:I enjoyed it. But really...
...cutting the Quidditch World Cup? What was up with that? ''Let the match begin! BAM! *Cuts to scene of everyone celebrating*
Everything seemed abit fast, too. Also, I hadn't minded the new Dumbledor in the last however many movies he's replaced the older one in (is it one? I can't remember), but for some reason he bothered me alot in this movie. I don't know why, though. Voldemort reminds me of Vinnie Jones, too.