HL2 or Future Source games?

HL2 or a Future 2007 Source game?


  • Total voters
    58

amneziac85

Newbie
Joined
Mar 4, 2004
Messages
229
Reaction score
0
Simple question...

Would you rather have HL2 or a game made with Source say...3 years from now? A game made with 2007 Source technology would have alot of features that HL2 wouldnt...

Edit: By the way, lets just say that the 2007 game is their "Game of the Year"
 
HL2 I want .................by 2007 I want source 2.........
 
Are you saying I can reach into the future and get games that haven't been made yet instead of getting Half-Life 2?
 
Well, amneziac85, I think it's safe to say that everyone who posts regularly on a Half-Life 2 message board wants Half-Life 2. It doesn't necessarily have to be an either/or proposition, and I'm sure the tone of the thread as it develops won't treat the proposition as such.
 
Letters said:
Are you saying I can reach into the future and get games that haven't been made yet instead of getting Half-Life 2?

Yes I am...just hop in my time ma....just indulge me...
 
2007? Thats a bit too far away to make predictions.

I would take the safe bet and say HL2 as I don't know what will be around on source at that time.
 
SMT said:
Well, amneziac85, I think it's safe to say that everyone who posts regularly on a Half-Life 2 message board wants Half-Life 2. It doesn't necessarily have to be an either/or proposition, and I'm sure the tone of the thread as it develops won't treat the proposition as such.

Well if people want to flame, let em, I couldnt care less.
 
2007 of course. think about the technology 3 years from now. it will blow away HL2. that shouldnt even be a question
 
bate18 said:
2007 of course. think about the technology 3 years from now. it will blow away HL2. that shouldnt even be a question

Well right now the votes 7-3 in favor of HL2, so what some people see as obvious, others may see as ridiculous.
 
I want HL2 simply because my computer wouldnt run a 2007 game, and I have been waiting for hl2 for too long. (would anyones computer be able to run a 2007 game well?)
 
amneziac85 said:
Well right now the votes 7-3 in favor of HL2, so what some people see as obvious, others may see as ridiculous.


people are voting HL2 because they've got a taste of what it looks like. if we saw the source game from 07, im quite certain they would vote otherwise. these are hardcore, loyal HL2 fans we're talking about too
 
amneziac85 said:
Well right now the votes 7-3 in favor of HL2, so what some people see as obvious, others may see as ridiculous.

And those you've not accounted for just think it's a silly question and a moot argument. :dozey:
 
slicktick said:
I want HL2 simply because my computer wouldnt run a 2007 game, and I have been waiting for hl2 for too long. (would anyones computer be able to run a 2007 game well?)

Maybe I wasnt clear but I thought it was assumed that your computer could handle Game of the Year 07 or else there would be no point of even asking...none of our computers can.
 
bate18 said:
2007 of course. think about the technology 3 years from now. it will blow away HL2. that shouldnt even be a question

Yes but will the game play be better? It could be the next iteration of leisure suit Larry for all you know.
 
I voted for the 2007 one because I'm addicted to gambling.
 
You'll only get one answer here. This is a Half-Life2 based site, so, undoubtably, the answer will be favoring HL2 :)
 
but its basically a question of gameplay or technology

No it isn't. Choosing a more technologically advanced game does not mean one forfeits gameplay for technology. Who is to say the hypothetical 2007 game doesn't have much better gameplay than hl2? I would rather have a game with awesome gameplay and incredible graphics than a game with awesome gameplay and passable graphics.

I think in 2007 there will be much better technology than Source around so I voted for hl2.
 
HL2 and it's expansions, and mods. When I say mod, I mean mod for HL2, not some other game that uses Source.
 
gameplay versus techonology, sheesh, that's not a very interesting fight, most online action gamers still play counter-strike don't they?
 
...I dunno why, but CS seems a bit nubbish to me [pardon my leet]. I used to love that game but I got so fed up with the idiots that play it (90% of CS players are annoying in one way or another, be it racism, homophobism, or just annoying).

Pity too, since I was damn good.
 
well, i rarely play on public servers, if you haven't played cs in a lan party your missing an unbelievabel amount of enjoyment
 
I think some Valve guy said Source will still be a work-in-progress after HL2 and its mods so it will still be up-to-date in 2007...
 
amneziac85 said:
Maybe for the simple :LOL: , but its basically a question of gameplay or technology

No its weird cause we don't what how that other game is gonna be like. So how the hell can we know what we would pick? That game might blow HL 2 out of the water by then , but might be a very bad game too.

Thats why the poll is weird.

And also, how would you know if HL 2 will offer better gameplay then that 2007 game?
 
well Half-Life 2 will be geting better and better with the updates over steam, by 2007 it will be even better then it is now!!!

HALF-LIFE 2 is the best (until HL3)
 
Well a 2007 game would be a post-HL2 game. By then rich characters, character interaction, storytelling, etc. may be the norm. Look at how different post-HL1 are from pre-HL1. I choose HL2 though because it took 5 years to make while the 2007 game, if started now, could only take ~3 years; more time for developers means a better game. I also like the HL2 world and have so many questions about it.
 
Well, if I were to reach into the future and grab the hardware and game in 2007 there would be nobody to play online with, would there?
 
kinda redundant... "Hl2 its all I need till HL3"
well HL3 is probably gonna be the game of the year 2007, so gimme HL2 now and I can wait for the next installment, wouldnt want to break the story and play it outta sequence ;)
 
Back
Top