If they nuke US, We should nuke their Holy Sites

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lemonking

Newbie
Joined
Aug 13, 2004
Messages
2,017
Reaction score
0
If they nuke US, We should nuke their Holy Sites'
Submitted by scienott on

Colorado congressman Tom Tancredo told a radio show host that the U.S. could "take out" Islamic holy sites if Muslim fundamentalist terrorists attacked the country with nuclear weapons. He made his remarks Friday on WFLA-AM.

Talk show host Pat Campbell asked the Littleton Republican how the country should respond if terrorists struck several U.S. cities with nuclear weapons.

"Well, what if you said something like — if this happens in the United States, and we determine that it is the result of extremist, fundamentalist Muslims, you know, you could take out their holy sites," Tancredo answered.

"You're talking about bombing Mecca," Campbell said.

"Yeah," Tancredo responded.

The congressman later said he was "just throwing out some ideas" and that an "ultimate threat" might have to be met with an "ultimate response."

Spokesman Will Adams said the four-term congressman doesn't support threatening holy Islamic sites but that Tancredo was grappling with the hypothetical situation of an attack deadlier than 9/11. "We have an enemy with no uniform, no state, who looks like you and me and only emerges right before an attack. How do we go after someone like that?"

"What is near and dear to them? They're willing to sacrifice everything in this world for the next one. What is the pressure point that would deter them from their murderous impulses?" he said.

Mohammad Noorzai, coordinator of the Colorado Muslim Council and a native of Afghanistan, said Tancredo's remarks were radical and unrepresentative but that people in Tancredo's position need to watch their words when it comes to sacred religious sites and texts.
-----------taken from teoorentspy.com


I agree
 
If they nuke the the Mecca in return... this world is the shit that hits the fan...
 
if you fuking nuke the shit outta them then its over..which is good
 
Thing is, they're not in Mecca, well most of them aren't. They are all over the world.

You don't think they'd seek the ultimate revenge after that kind of thing?

It's not like Al Qaeda HQ is in Mecca. You'd just kill a lot of innocent people.
 
omg paranoid.. the reason china is on edge with America at the moment, is because of their recent offer to buy a leading American oil company that has most of its operations based near china.. there all iffy wiffy about it cause it would mean losing a fraction of direct control over middle eastern supplies. This is a battle to control energy, obsolete energy proccesses in alot of peoples minds, but beurocratically embeded to such an extent that oil company's wont die without a fight first.
 
That would be like, if you had a roomate, he went out and ****ed with people, the people came back and stole your fridge, or broke your window. Or something of equal value to the both of you which both of you own.

There are more people who are good, who think of those sites as holy, than there are evil men thinking the same sites are holy. Destroying holy sites will only create more evil men intent on destroying western civilisation.
 
.....you gotta point there Maxi...ok I loose you guys are right
 
what if they conquer but not destroy the holy sites forcing the people to reveal the identity of the terrorist or something like that?
 
They would think of it as an insult. What if each time you went to church(if you're religious) you had to show your identity and prove that you're not a terrorist. And they do this because 100 out of the billions of churgoers are terrorists.
 
As allready said that would indeed start world war 3.


I'm not in the slightest bit joking.


EDIT: Thankfully the chances of any of this happening are miniscule...
 
Lemon king, thats absolutely stupid. If they nuked us they would be real Muslims so destroying the holy sites for the biggest religion in the world, is stupid, Muslims condem violence.
 
I can feel my IQ dropping just reading this thread.
 
.......you know what? **** you I dont think 108 is low so stfu bitch



I said that I was wrong read my post you wiking
 
108? Act like it.

Terrorists = not Muslims
Bombing Muslims, or anyone -->Terrorists
You would only make things worse, you obviously have no idea of what the Terrorists think. Muslim leaders condem the bombings.

Your post reads very arrogantly as well, you want to bomb mecca as a punishment. Newsflash you are not the worldpolice, and goddammit never should be.
 
Lemonking said:
.....you gotta point there Maxi...ok I loose you guys are right




read my posts you bone head I said I was wrong in my opnion

I didnt write that that I took it from torrentspy.com
 
Lemonking said:
.......you know what? **** you I dont think 108 is low so stfu bitch



I said that I was wrong read my post you wiking

Was the first part also meant for me?

Oh, and I read your post now, sorry.
 
no the first part wasnt for you and sry for calling you wiking I was a bit mad
 
Who here actually wants to watch a nuke detonate and kill thousands of people huh!. Hands up who wants to watch people die? You sick bastards!
 
It's insane, the US wouldn't do it, but do you think that would stop it. i mean, terrorists are not muslims, but they think they act in favor for them. So what if the US Nuked mecca, and proimised to nuke more sites for every terrorist attack. Or do you think that would just enrage and encourage more terrorist attacks. Now be carefull, think about what you would do, you would be angry, but you know the US would kill millions if you did anything.
 
It really wouldn't do any good at all. It's like seeing several ants crawling on your orange, so you exterminate maybe a 100th of the nest in return. But that just angers the entire colony, so they all come after you.

Nuking religious sites would just be really, really silly. Fine, nuke every mayor Islamic population centre, there's some ridiculously unhinged logic at work there. But nuking religious sites is completely illogical.
 
But nuking religious sites is completely illogical.
I think the threat of it is quite powerful. 'Religion' is all these people care about. The threat of losing Mecca because of their actions would be a tough pill to swallow.
 
It's inhumane, and utterly insane to punish innocent people for the crimes of terrorists, but I don't know if I was a terrorists, fighting for islam, and knowing that thousands would be killed if I did anything. What worries me is that if nukes are used by the terrorists, the US might do this, cause nukes invoke total war, and no one can win the US in a total war. It's just scares me, that hawks are going to view this as an option, cause as far as i can see it would stop those terrorists, allah maybe all powerfull, but if you blow yourself up, thousands of people would be killed. Thats a big deterrent.
 
seinfeldrules said:
I think the threat of it is quite powerful. 'Religion' is all these people care about. The threat of losing Mecca because of their actions would be a tough pill to swallow.

You'd be swallowing the tough pill when a billion newly-converted terrorist islamists shoved a pipe-bomb up your ass.
 
I'm not even Muslim, but if they nuked a holy site full of innocent people due to the actions of terrorists, hell, [SARCASM]I would become a suicide bomber.[/SARCASM]

COME AND GET ME NET POLICE :LOL:

*edited - disclaimered due to fear of Big Brother :O *adjusts tinfoil hat*
 
You'd be swallowing the tough pill when a billion newly-converted terrorist islamists shoved a pipe-bomb up your ass.
As would they when a REALLY pissed off America comes out after em. The topic isnt about whether America should attack first, it is how we could respond if one of our cities was nuked.
 
Lemonking said:
if you fuking nuke the shit outta them then its over..which is good
stupid, if they destroy Messa, the whole (much larger than Al-Quada) muslim community will go in rage, and i don't want that, what a stupid guy that said that, how do you think muslim friends in US feel about his statment
 
Laivasse said:
I'm not even Muslim, but if they nuked a holy site full of innocent people due to the actions of terrorists, hell, [SARCASM]I would become a suicide bomber.[/SARCASM]

COME AND GET ME NET POLICE :LOL:

*edited - disclaimered due to fear of Big Brother :O *adjusts tinfoil hat*
yeah, but if you killed people in a terrorist attack, the US would just kill thousands more because of you, it's one thing to say this on the net, but think carefully what you would do in real live.
 
iyfyoufhl said:
stupid, if they destroy Messa, the whole (much larger than Al-Quada) muslim community will go in rage, and i don't want that, what a stupid guy that said that, how do you think muslim friends in US feel about his statment
Yes but what could they, the us has a militery budget larger then the whole ****ing world combined, what would they do. The reason why terroist can do this, is because the US doesn't go out all the way. Why aren't they so much terrorist atatcks in dictator countries. because if someone does this, the dictator kills his or her whole family for it. this is the same. And the muslims of the world are allredy enraged about the US, and so what.
 
Erm, in Iraq there were VERY regular attacks on Sadam Husseigns soldiers.
 
If the USA was nuked by terrorists I would feel sorry for those who died and suffered becouse of that. If they respond by nuking a city full of people who had nothing to do with it I would no longer be sorry, but seriously pissed off. Not that my anger would change much but I dont think I am alone.
 
Yeah, threaten people with nukes. That's REAL smart diplomacy in action.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top