YROC
Formerly Hokey McSmokey
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2008
- Messages
- 2,966
- Reaction score
- 65
Here's a cute picture I took
Not even a month and he's already on the prowl.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Here's a cute picture I took
Man, and I thought the middle east had boring looking buildings.
^ Hahaha, holy shit. What from?
hnng
This. Set to silly piano music.reminds me of that Monty Python dancing teeth animation.
dem eyes
*SNIP*
I never understood why those cookies were considered god tier. Never was a huge fan. The Peppermint patties should be god tier.
*SNIP*
I don't think you understand, read this:
Oh man, I'm so jelly you can hear 48khz sinewaves!
Currently studying the 'voodoo' quality 24-Bit, 92khz vinyl rips, saved to lossless (comes to like 1GB per album - that's a lot of detailed information). Frequencies outside of the range of human hearing are possible on vinyl, and those frequencies interact with frequencies you can hear; hence the voodoo.
But, in the end, they are limited by the source: however the vinyl was mastered. That's why I think the MFSL remasters (and the like) are the best. If you combine the vinyl voodoo with an MFSL remaster, you will have orgasmic quality.
But you need a good sound system. A 24 bit audio processor (most modern ones? - the X-Fi, for example), and you need good speakers. I currently have that, the only thing is that I'd like to get a new amp, probably Denon or Onkyo, whatever I can afford with great reviews. But my next amp/receiver will have a fiber optic audio input. That's the only thing I'm lacking.
This is just a difference in bit rate/sample rate of rips - all I need is a bigger hard drive to store the larger files, which is fine for albums that are special to me. So it's not a matter of spending more money. If you are talking about music creation, I've created all of my music using software and samples (and occasionally, a $10 microphone that doesn't seem to work anymore). I haven't invested in a keyboard yet.Yes, I'm aware that on a theoretical basis, humans can detect (not hear) higher frequencies than 20khz through echolocation. But in a double blind trial, I can guarantee you won't be able to tell the difference between a vinyl recorded on a good 24/96 and a good 24/44 sampler. The same kind of double blind trial that proved that below 20 feet, a $2 generic Chinese-made cable provides the same signal quality as a $200 Monster cable.
For studio work, I'll concede that it's just generally better to have a good starting sample. But for reproduction, hell no. I'd rather spend my thousands on creative devices.
Also reminds me of that Monty Python dancing teeth animation.