Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
You guys really contradict yourselves when you complain about too much CGI...
Lord of the Rings?
Matrix?
Transformers?
Spiderman?
Pirates of the Caribbean?
300?
Did you guys also hate these movies because of the excessive use of CGI as well?
It was a bit stupid when they make a bunch of gophers in CGI for no reason whatsoever, then:You guys really contradict yourselves when you complain about too much CGI...
Lord of the Rings?
Matrix?
Transformers?
Spiderman?
Pirates of the Caribbean?
300?
Did you guys also hate these movies because of the excessive use of CGI as well?
Blade Runner was set in 2019 ffs, which is more like our year 2090 being more accurate. It can use as much CGI as it wants because the objects don't exist.Yeah Blade Runner was even thought to have a remake in CGI. In fact the original with the "Hades" scene or the landscape scene in the spinner, were all CGI. The building's below were also just pictures. It's an ancient form of CGI, but it still is CGI.
I thought they actually refrained from CGI quite well. Considering.
Edit: Wait, the gophers were CGI!?
It was damn obvious to me.
Refrained from using CGI? Did we see the same movie?
Nearly everything was CGI, from the birds to insects, even the ****ing flora.
Very good review. I agree with most of it.
Guy is a total asswipe. Yes, I want to watch somebody eat ice cream, drink and then burp in my face while watching his review. He says the ending Blanchet having her face melted off. She ****ing turned into dust and dissipated! He could'nt even tell that the alien never really wanted to tell anything to a human anyways. The ending was really a wedding as well. The guy can't even remember how many crystal skulls there were neither. He also thinks there were 14 because in his mind, he thought the commies took the skull away from that alien. The guy is considerably confused at what happened in the movie and just overall lost. James the Nintendo nerd is the authority on the film.
It was ****ing awful...
...they've super heroed him. The plot being utter crap and the movie not flowing in the slightest didn't help either....
I predicted this film quite mightily if I do say so myself. I'm pretty good about these things without having actually seen them. It doesn't bother me to read spoilers about the movie either because I don't intend on watching it.
The movie was just dumb. It was awful. It lacked all the redeeming qualities of the originals.
And no, it wasn't because it wasn't realistic. It was because it was bad. The dialog was abysmal. Most of the one-liners and banter between characters was embarrassing. The action was absurd. Not because it was unrealistic, but because it was ****ing stupid. It was a kiddified, pussified, watered down Indiana Jones for a new generation. This is the result of tons of focus groups, family demographics, and George Lucas.
I actually didn't even mind the alien plot that much. But like everything else in the movie, they pushed it to the point of absurdity. The goddamn skull got more character development than Indy.
Wow are you saying that you made a prediction that -some- people agree with and that validates your opinion so much you can hold it as fact without even seeing the film?
Go you.
Seriously, aliens? Crystal skulls? All devouring ants? What the **** was up with the gophers? Who thinks this shit up?
Haha, glad you asked. Turns out every single element of the movie was based in folklore or losely based in fact.
Explain the Gophers.
That said, the movie was still utter shit