O
O.G. GOaT
Guest
baxter said:You are talking shite pal, how you dare tell people that have a valid point of view to shut up. It is plebs like you that have drove valve to introduce steam.
As for being a jealous twat, wake up mate, what have we to be jealous at?
You are a very sad and opinionated person.
Do you really think that unlocking games over the net is the way forward and it will lower prices?
WAKE UP
What the hell are you talking about? it’s the Plebs who pirate games that drove valve to create steam. If wanting to have a cheap and efficient way to keep my games patches up to date, them im a pleb too! Im sick and tire of having to find and download patches!
Steam is good, it is a more efficient way to keep your game patches up to date, it’s a better alternative to constantly having to find and download patches, that was just annoying!
I didn’t know I had to register My half-life 2 copy to play the single player until I read the fat sticker telling me.
The people who miss understood this for online gaming, if I was still in a bad mood I would call them all stupid, because “I” and many other people understood it meant the single player from the word go. BUT I can see now how people could of gotten it confused with multiplayer, they may have a valid point and sure valve should of made a bigger effort in advertising, informing people how they need to register to play the single player, BUT a big Rick Waller BUT here, it does not give you the right to start complaining about a companies attempt to protect its product, it wasn’t hard to install steam, create an account and register the game, it wasn’t asking you to cut off your dick and post it with the receipt of your game of half-life to register the game!
Did it stop piracy? there is always going to be pirate copies but valve has slowed it, it has made it harder to pirate, compared to the first half-life, you may not see this a pirating but with the first half-life all you had to do was buy one copy and lend it to your friend to install on their computer and so on and so on. its like putting pressure on a really bad cut, you still gonna lose blood, but not as much if the pressure wasn’t there.
I didn’t say unlocking games over the net will make them cheaper, I said downloading them over the net will make them cheaper, if you download them strait from the developer you cut out the middlemen…
…I’m just guessing here, so say you pay £40 for a game, twenty quid will go to the game developer, ten quid to the games publisher, ten quid will go to the game shop where you buy the game, if you gut out the publisher and distributor , you cut out their costs, the cost of a CD, packaging, shipping and what not, you also cut out the need for the middlemen to make a profit, maybe someone can explain it better them, im sure they can.
Soon all developers will have their own versions of steam, they all want to do what they can to slow down piracy, they all want to make a profit and still make their games affordable, why make games if people cant play them?
How many games developers out their have games but don’t have publishers to sell their games? Most of them may be crap, but there are some good games that don’t get picked up by publishers because the publisher don’t think they will sell and make a good profit, hell even valve had a hard time trying to sell their idea to a publisher.
So if developers have their own version of steam this would free up developers to be more creative with their games, and not just make games their publishers know will make a profit. This will create more diversity and more competition eventually lowering price more. ( I think anyway)
So who needs to wake up?