Dog--
The Freeman
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2005
- Messages
- 9,741
- Reaction score
- 25
Well the same goes for you then. I don't know if you were spanked or not, but you don't know how it works the other way around either. So any conclusion YOU draw is ALSO invalid.and you know it worked because you were also raised on the alternative (no spanking) and that didnt work ......right? ok lets say for arguments sake you were spanked, died, were reborn with all your memories intact but then were raised with no spanking.. ..your experiences are not typical of the average person therefore any conclusion you would draw would be instantly invalid
Spanking is the easiest but from personal experience I found it was most effective. A kid is more likely to misbehave again if you just yell at him or send him to his room, but if you smack him in the head he will NOT want that again so he'll be alot more careful of his actions. My dad is the one who hit me, my mom sent me to my room/made me stand in the corner/etc, and I was WAY more behaved around my dad.look spanking is the lazy man's way out, it is a million times more difficult to discipline without beating your child. I know this from direct hands on experience of having to dole out discipline without using force. can any of you say the same?
Exactly - what's wrong with that? for example I had a fascination with fire, I'd steal matches and light them. My dad caught me one day and smacked me in the head. I never touched matches ever again for fear of being hit. Now when I started to grow up I realized that I shouldn't do it because it's not smart to **** around with fire. So he kept me fearful of it long enough for me to learn that it was stupid to light matches in my house.so in other words you were trained to fear the beating and not why what you did was wrong
I never said the officer was justified in what he did, but I'm not going to go around yelling about it because the guy deserved it. Yes, the officer shouldn't have done it, but I don't really care that he did because the perp is a douche.look, too many of you think in only one way: emotionally. there is no critical thinking. you cant for a minute step away from all your preconcieved notions and look at this, or anything else with an unbiased eye. regardless if the perp has just strangled a roomful of piuppies with the shoelace off the shoe of a toddler he just ate, the POLICE OFFICER STILL ACTED UNLAWFULLY. it's like some of you just cant get beyond this. I blame NOT watching Law and Order for this
So what right do you have to say that spanking is bad parenting? Sure it doesn't work for everyone (no punishment does), but it worked for you, didn't it?my dad gave me the beats whenever I misbehaved. I turned out ok. the point is that personal expereinces are not the norm. what works for one may not work for another
Kinda like a guy strangling a puppy with the shoelace of a toddler he just ate?this is not the point. this is also an example of jumping to a conclusion based on nothing more than emotion. legality doesnt play a part in your reasoning because you dont understand the legality behind the issue so you throw in ridiculous scenarios that are completely inappropriate to the subject at hand.
I know this isn't directed at me, but I don't think anyone here was rooting for the guy to be kicked in the head, most people here don't really hold it against the officer because the perp deserved it.so instead you're advocating that the police officer break the law? isnt he supposed to uphold the law?
Holy ****.. Is that what you do every time you argue with someone? That post took like 20 minutes..