CptStern
suckmonkey
- Joined
- May 5, 2004
- Messages
- 10,303
- Reaction score
- 62
Continued from these 2 threads.
http://www.halflife2.net/forums/showthread.php?t=99999
http://www.halflife2.net/forums/showthread.php?t=100564
It warrented a new thread because this latest news is an important development for online rights in WoW
"Shortly after Lambda Legal, the USA's "oldest and largest" gay and lesbian civil rights organization, sent a letter to Blizzard regarding the previously mentioned Oz guild debate, the company sent guild leader Sara Andrews an apology for the warning she received after recruiting for her "GLBT friendly" guild in an open channel.
Equating World of Warcraft and other online worlds as "public accommodations," establishments set up by private institutions as meeting places for the general public, Lambda Legal cited extensive anti-discrimination case law stating that while Blizzard is "well within its rights to insist that players avoid referring to other gamers in an 'insulting manner,'" it cannot ban mention of a person's own sexual orientation. "There is nothing 'insulting' about identifying oneself as gay, lesbian or transgender," said the letter, "nor does the announcement of a guild for LGBT gamers constitute 'harassment' in any sense of the word."
Andrews said an email came to her from Blizzard's customer service apologizing for the warning she received, calling it "an unfortunate interpretation of their policy," and that those policies were now under review. According to Andrews, the apology means that guilds can continue to recruit in an open manner.
http://www.edge-online.co.uk/archives/2006/02/blizzard_apolog.php
while I think it's good that Blizzard apologized I fear this has opened a whole new can of worms as many special interest groups will be testing the policy in the coming weeks
http://www.halflife2.net/forums/showthread.php?t=99999
http://www.halflife2.net/forums/showthread.php?t=100564
It warrented a new thread because this latest news is an important development for online rights in WoW
"Shortly after Lambda Legal, the USA's "oldest and largest" gay and lesbian civil rights organization, sent a letter to Blizzard regarding the previously mentioned Oz guild debate, the company sent guild leader Sara Andrews an apology for the warning she received after recruiting for her "GLBT friendly" guild in an open channel.
Equating World of Warcraft and other online worlds as "public accommodations," establishments set up by private institutions as meeting places for the general public, Lambda Legal cited extensive anti-discrimination case law stating that while Blizzard is "well within its rights to insist that players avoid referring to other gamers in an 'insulting manner,'" it cannot ban mention of a person's own sexual orientation. "There is nothing 'insulting' about identifying oneself as gay, lesbian or transgender," said the letter, "nor does the announcement of a guild for LGBT gamers constitute 'harassment' in any sense of the word."
Andrews said an email came to her from Blizzard's customer service apologizing for the warning she received, calling it "an unfortunate interpretation of their policy," and that those policies were now under review. According to Andrews, the apology means that guilds can continue to recruit in an open manner.
http://www.edge-online.co.uk/archives/2006/02/blizzard_apolog.php
while I think it's good that Blizzard apologized I fear this has opened a whole new can of worms as many special interest groups will be testing the policy in the coming weeks