B-MAn
Newbie
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2004
- Messages
- 1,289
- Reaction score
- 0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Farrowlesparrow said:Whats the point...
Feath said:Yeah, I've never understood dissections. They don't show anything except for "This bit is purple and squishy". You can learn just as much by drawing diagrams, or even just having stuff explained to you.
Feath said:Yeah, I've never understood dissections. They don't show anything except for "This bit is purple and squishy". You can learn just as much by drawing diagrams, or even just having stuff explained to you.
kirovman said:I hope that Surgeons don't follow your methods of training :O
Feath said:Tut, Obviously I didn't mean that. I meant dissections where some people learn very basic stuff from a guy at the front. I accept that surgeons probably need a bit of practise on corpses. I can see the merits of surgeon. But I don't see the point of someone holding up some lungs and saying "The lungs take in Oxygen and put out Carbon Dioxide". You can explain that without the lungs.
But did it have to be alive? A little uneccesary don't you think?satch919 said:If the dog was going to be put to sleep anyways, then I don't see a problem with it if its used for teaching and furthering the understanding of vital organs. Plus, notification went out to the parents and students that they were going to use a live but sedated animal. They should really try to get a hold of deceased animals for dissection but if its in the name of science, I suppose its somewhat acceptable.
The teacher looks pretty odd. Almost like a mad scientist.
In addition, Im a huge dog lover and I have four of my own. However, Im a big believer in science and what it can give us.
IonizeMyAtoms said:A couple years ago at my girlfriend's school (Ontario College of Art and Design), an animal rights activist skinned a live cat to show how inhumane wearing fur is (or something like that) and showed it to his class. He ended up getting kicked out, and last year at the Toronto Film Festival a documentary on the whole ordeal was shown.
IonizeMyAtoms said:But did it have to be alive? A little uneccesary don't you think?
Did he just want attention or something? Obviously people would be pissed at that.
Hectic Glenn said:Jesus Christ, the dog is sedated people. They're not cutting it open and ripping out organs while he plays fetch. He can't feel anything, and in this case the digestive system is mostly seen just by opening the front of the abdomen. He wouldn't be pulling out the stomach or poking around in sphcinters. Its just like normal surgery as someone else said. And its in the name of learning.
I have a cat, i personally wouldn't let them do it to him, but this dog was probably bred for this use, better than getting shampoo in its eye (i dont like animal testing one bit but it is very useful). I'm sure the dog will be fine afterwards. You people wanna arrest him?!?! Its not like he murdered it, this type of practice is common on animals, just because its a pet suddenly it makes it illegal. In the name of biological science its justified, the experience to see it properly is 1000 times more valuble than reading it from a book. In the long run some of those people learning will turn out to be vets which will be saving 100's more animals, which is an amazing thing to be doing.
Hectic Glenn said:Jesus Christ, the dog is sedated people. They're not cutting it open and ripping out organs while he plays fetch. He can't feel anything, and in this case the digestive system is mostly seen just by opening the front of the abdomen. He wouldn't be pulling out the stomach or poking around in sphcinters. Its just like normal surgery as someone else said. And its in the name of learning.
I have a cat, i personally wouldn't let them do it to him, but this dog was probably bred for this use, better than getting shampoo in its eye (i dont like animal testing one bit but it is very useful). I'm sure the dog will be fine afterwards. You people wanna arrest him?!?! Its not like he murdered it, this type of practice is common on animals, just because its a pet suddenly it makes it illegal. In the name of biological science its justified, the experience to see it properly is 1000 times more valuble than reading it from a book. In the long run some of those people learning will turn out to be vets which will be saving 100's more animals, which is an amazing thing to be doing.
short recoil said:I have no problems with this procedure being done, i wouldn't have a problem with it being done without sedation, but that's just me.
If it's going to die who cares anyway, being sedated it feels nothing, when it dies it feels nothing.............overall it feels nothing so how can it be cruel?
I personally think humans have become far too soft, and please spare the "oh but we've changed" bullshit.
No, i don't have a brain implant, i would require one to become a perfect soldier however, i don't follow orders otherwise.15357 said:do you have a brain implant? you could become the perfect soldier.