Mechagodzilla
Tank
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2003
- Messages
- 6,973
- Reaction score
- 0
"show my wrong words, show where i was not using sense...why can't nobody do this!?"
"i have to spread the word...if you're not a dipshit you should too..."
"some people doesn't deserve to be saved [by animal medical testing]!"
"You're the wuss here mecha...supported by your shitty functionalist naci theories [that people have been eating meat for millenia]."
"Idiots view the movie [made by PETA advocate Joaquin Phoenix and containing contextless images of dying animals as an indictment of "speciesism"] as some propaganda, real people at least try to condem such abuse. It's about Nacizm... you condem nacizm, right?"
"it is real and it is happening, this is the best evidence someone can get...video! [...] only idiots take this video as propaganda."
Ludah: "perhaps eloquently state a rationale against this behavior instead of using appeals to emotion."
Raeven0: "An authentic video of events is evidence of the following things:
1) Such events happen.
2) ..."
Mechagodzilla: "basing a worldview off of purely anecdotal evidence is plain stupid. [...] What we are talking about is whether the tactic of showing selectively edited abuse footage can be used as a valid logical argument.
The correct answer is that it can't, as it's Anecdotal Evidence that makes an Emotional Appeal towards Wisdom in Repugnace. (Those are, yes, logical fallacies by the way)"
"an answer to mecha...this probably aren't coincidences, this is mostlikely sistematic and often practiced."
Mecha: "'Systematic' would imply that an actual system exists designed purely to abuse animals."
"i found another "interesting" short video clip (no violence, safe to watch).
it shows a cow crying before death. [...] maybe before it died, it was saying something like..."pain, pain, pain, stop pain, stop pain, stop pain...BBAAMM...more pain, more pain, more pain...BBAAMM#2...more more pain, more more pain...SLICE..." or whatever comes next."
Ludah: "perhaps eloquently state a rationale against this behavior instead of using appeals to emotion."
"you don't often see people tie down other people and drive over them on a mass scale for fun or profit, do you?"
Mecha: "I [have] already pointed out that that [is] a red herring."
"[Mechagodzilla] labeld me as a conspiracy theorist, even when i said it a million times i'm not."
Earlier:
"It was really a terrorist attack, but the US gov saw a good oppurtunity to have its way, so they "accidentaly" ignored it.
This is called white crime my idiot friend!
I simply don't belive the worlds strongest nation could not shoot down two 747s!?"
"[...] i think [Mechagodzilla] is somewhat implying that i'm acting out on emotion not reason"
Mecha: "It's not implied. When every single thing you say in a post is a logical fallacy, it is a fact that you aren't being reasonable.
That's the definition of unreasonable: you fail to understand reason."
"i have to spread the word...if you're not a dipshit you should too..."
"some people doesn't deserve to be saved [by animal medical testing]!"
"You're the wuss here mecha...supported by your shitty functionalist naci theories [that people have been eating meat for millenia]."
"Idiots view the movie [made by PETA advocate Joaquin Phoenix and containing contextless images of dying animals as an indictment of "speciesism"] as some propaganda, real people at least try to condem such abuse. It's about Nacizm... you condem nacizm, right?"
"it is real and it is happening, this is the best evidence someone can get...video! [...] only idiots take this video as propaganda."
Ludah: "perhaps eloquently state a rationale against this behavior instead of using appeals to emotion."
Raeven0: "An authentic video of events is evidence of the following things:
1) Such events happen.
2) ..."
Mechagodzilla: "basing a worldview off of purely anecdotal evidence is plain stupid. [...] What we are talking about is whether the tactic of showing selectively edited abuse footage can be used as a valid logical argument.
The correct answer is that it can't, as it's Anecdotal Evidence that makes an Emotional Appeal towards Wisdom in Repugnace. (Those are, yes, logical fallacies by the way)"
"an answer to mecha...this probably aren't coincidences, this is mostlikely sistematic and often practiced."
Mecha: "'Systematic' would imply that an actual system exists designed purely to abuse animals."
"i found another "interesting" short video clip (no violence, safe to watch).
it shows a cow crying before death. [...] maybe before it died, it was saying something like..."pain, pain, pain, stop pain, stop pain, stop pain...BBAAMM...more pain, more pain, more pain...BBAAMM#2...more more pain, more more pain...SLICE..." or whatever comes next."
Ludah: "perhaps eloquently state a rationale against this behavior instead of using appeals to emotion."
"you don't often see people tie down other people and drive over them on a mass scale for fun or profit, do you?"
Mecha: "I [have] already pointed out that that [is] a red herring."
"[Mechagodzilla] labeld me as a conspiracy theorist, even when i said it a million times i'm not."
Earlier:
"It was really a terrorist attack, but the US gov saw a good oppurtunity to have its way, so they "accidentaly" ignored it.
This is called white crime my idiot friend!
I simply don't belive the worlds strongest nation could not shoot down two 747s!?"
"[...] i think [Mechagodzilla] is somewhat implying that i'm acting out on emotion not reason"
Mecha: "It's not implied. When every single thing you say in a post is a logical fallacy, it is a fact that you aren't being reasonable.
That's the definition of unreasonable: you fail to understand reason."
