LOL what a dick

Lemonking

Lemonking

Newbie
Joined
Aug 13, 2004
Messages
2,017
Reaction score
0
http://www.foxnews.com/

go to Video
then choose ur I-net speed


then choose a topic
-then O Reilly


and then lol....Im still laughing
ll O'Reilly's Talking Points
How Jane Fonda and the BBC put you in danger


the shit
lhe talks is sooooo funny


bwhahahahahaah:E
 
Jane Fonda is a stupid bitch, and Oreilly is mostly right.
 
I mean that "thank you left wing media"
instead of freeing Iraq blah blah" "they have Guntanamo blah blah"
LOLOLOL is he some kind of Press-Nazi?
 
Lemonking said:
I mean that "thank you left wing media"
instead of freeing Iraq blah blah" "they have Guntanamo blah blah"
LOLOLOL is he some kind of Press-Nazi?
Click to expand...
He is right though, the media (including Fox News) covers mostly the negative aspects of the war, things that make America look bad. We get daily updates on the body count, I don't see any daily updates on how we are progressing positivley in Iraq (we are).
 
foxtrot, how come US media never reports casualty figures for iraqis killed ...I mean we know of every single american death why doesnt the american media report iraqi civilian deaths?

oh and O relilly is an idiot who couldnt argue his way out of a paper bag ..give me 2 minutes with him and I'll have him tongue tied
 
CptStern said:
oh and O relilly is an idiot who couldnt argue his way out of a paper bag ..give me 2 minutes with him and I'll have him tongue tied
Click to expand...

He'd cut your mic first.
 
I'd punch him in the adams apple before the show to let him know I wont put up with his usual tactics :E

o reilly is a loudmouth and like most loud mouths he's also a coward
 
CptStern said:
foxtrot, how come US media never reports casualty figures for iraqis killed ...I mean we know of every single american death why doesnt the american media report iraqi civilian deaths?
Click to expand...
what would they say for their sources?

michael moore? iraqbodycount? cptstern? they'd be laughed at, no one reports civilian deaths because NOBODY KNOWS STERN. but i bet you do, go google it and maybe youll find out.
 
Jane Fonda IS a disgrace. I'll still never understand why she wasn't brought on charges of treason, if there's anything since the Roseburgs that calls for it her actions do, aiding the enemy.
 
gh0st said:
what would they say for their sources?

michael moore? iraqbodycount? cptstern? they'd be laughed at, no one reports civilian deaths because NOBODY KNOWS STERN. but i bet you do, go google it and maybe youll find out.
Click to expand...

I'm well aware that they dont know/care:


“We don’t do body counts” - General Tommy Franks, US Central Command


“Change the channel” - Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt's advice to Iraqis who see TV images of innocent civilians killed by coalition troops.


that's my point
 
CptStern said:
I'm well aware that they dont know/care:


“We don’t do body counts” - General Tommy Franks, US Central Command


“Change the channel” - Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt's advice to Iraqis who see TV images of innocent civilians killed by coalition troops.


that's my point
Click to expand...
Good points, if you don't want to see that sort of propaganda, turn the channel. They are very rare cases.
 
Who cares what O'Reilly says? The guy fornicates himself with vibrators (no lie).
 
Bill O' Reilly is a liar. He's full of himself and generally just an asshole. Don't believe me? Read the chapter in Al Franken's "Lies" book called, "Bill O' Reilly: Lying, Splotchy Bully". The guy claims to have won two Peabody awards when he hosted Inside Edition. However, it was only a Polk award. Thats not all though. Instead of admitting a mistake and correcting it, he went after those that called him on it and tried to make them look like the attackers. He labeled his nightly show, "Attack Journalism". Now, O'Reilly talking about attack journalism like its a bad thing? His entire show is about attacking others!

In another case, a Muslim caller criticized The Factor on air because O'Reilly compare the Qur'an to Hitler's Mein Kampf. The transcript is as follows:

Muslim caller: There's a lot of anti-Islamic rhetoric on there. For instance, you know, you compared the Koran to Mein Kampf......

O'Reilly: No, I didn't. That's a total lie.

Here's what O'Reilly had to say about college freshmen reading an assigned book called, Approaching the Qur'an: The Early Revelations: (previous show)

I don't know what this serves to take a look at our enemy's religion. See? I mean, I wouldn't give people a book during World War II on the emperor is God in Japan, would you?....I wouldn't read the book. And I'll tell you why: I wouldn't have read Mein Kampf either. If I were going to UNC in 1941, and you, Professor, said, "Read Mein Kampf," I would have said, "Hey, Professor, with all due respect, shove it. I ain't reading it."

Real nice journalism there huh? The "No Spin Zone"? The list of lies goes on with this guy.
 
Is anyone else slightly against supposed 'news' channels actually having adverts on them and their websites?

Plus, I can't seem to find this stuff about Jane Fonda. Clicking on 'Watch video about how the BBC and Jane Fonda put you in danger' brings a pop-up with an annoying Hyundi advert where clicking ANYTHING does nothign except re-start the advert.

EDITS: Reading the text report. The BBC won't stop at spin? What spin? They're impartially interviewing her, for God's sake!
 
Isn't Bill O'Reilly on Fox?

You guys do know that Rupert Murdoch is completely, and totally obsessed with spreading right-wing propaganda with Fox right?
 
Sulkdodds said:
EDITS: Reading the text report. The BBC won't stop at spin? What spin? They're impartially interviewing her, for God's sake!
Click to expand...

he means the bbc spins it's stories in general not just the fonda thing ....ya I know, I nearly passed out from the sheer irony of it all.

you know I absolutely hate when supporters of the war say things like "the anti-bush/american left media" and then name corporate owned media such as the ny times or cnn ...that's just appallingly inaccurate.

Really, I dont see what the big deal is. fonda doesnt say anything that most people around the world didnt already know ...hardly treasonous.
 
Bill O'Reilly is an idiot, the idea of the BBC is that they are impartial and report on facts. I really don't like his attitude, and I love it how he's somehow pretending to have any ****ing clue about this country and our media. He refutes that people were back on the transport system the day after, which is wrong, he claims that George Galloway somehow represents the BBC... Well, his ignorance really is impressive.

Yes, Murdoch's worst nightmare is indeed the BBC. A national service that he can't get his dirty claws into? Holy crap!
 
Why is the BBC refusing to label the London bombers "terrorists"?

also a insterresting video

we germans are spinless cowards this fag says watch it.
 
DeusExMachinia said:
And this is why I watch the Daily Show.
Click to expand...

Funnily enough, I trust a comedy show more than actual news.
 
Lemonking said:
Why is the BBC refusing to label the London bombers "terrorists"?
Click to expand...

It's a very emotive word, and it has not yet been proven that the attack was perpetrated by an organised group of terrorists. This could have been the action of a small group with a personal justification rather than a group with a political goal to serve.
 
Absinthe said:
Funnily enough, I trust a comedy show more than actual news.
Click to expand...


Its true, if I had to pick one news source for everything, I'd pick Daily Show. And hell, its even entertaining.
 
Lemonking said:
Why is the BBC refusing to label the London bombers "terrorists"?
Click to expand...

Well, a terrorist is someone who aims to cause political or social change through the user of terror. So far we do not know what the motivation or aims of the perpetrators are/were. So, calling them terrorists would be inappropriate at this point. Thus far, the only apt labels would be mass murderers or indeed bombers, because that is all that is established about them. They might've just been total random nutters.
Now I've thought about it, I can see where the BBC is coming from on the 'not wanting to cloud understanding' point.

If for no other reason, O'Reilly is a twat for asking 'why isn't the BBC saying "let's go after these guys, let's get them"' - BECAUSE IT'S REPORTING THE NEWS YOU F***ING ARSE! You might think that news reporting should be 1% information and 99% editorial/opinion, but over here we still have some semblance of rationality in our national media! This is how it's supposed to go in a free society: Something important happens. The media tells you, to the best of their ability, exactly what happened. You make your own mind what it means and how you feel about it.
 
"We report, you decide" is a far more apt slogan for BBC than it is for Fox.
 
Absinthe said:
"We report, you decide" is a far more apt slogan for BBC than it is for Fox.
Click to expand...

Uh, hang on. Is that Fox News' slogan, then?

OhsweetbabyJesus.
 
In my experience, US news channels are more liberal with their editorial. Would be nice if it was clearly marked as such, but in the UK I have observed that some channels (ITV and Sky I'm looking at you) are quite poor in their reporting, with deliberate use of emotive language.
 
jonbob said:
In my experience, US news channels are more liberal with their editorial. Would be nice if it was clearly marked as such, but in the UK I have observed that some channels (ITV and Sky I'm looking at you) are quite poor in their reporting, with deliberate use of emotive language.
Click to expand...

Hey, just for a laugh, guess what which UK broadcaster is owned by the same company that owns Fox?
 
pomegranate said:
Hey, just for a laugh, guess what which UK broadcaster is owned by the same company that owns Fox?
Click to expand...
Proving that just because they are owned by the same company doesn't mean they will have the same opinions.
 
sure it does ..it's called editoralizing because of fiscal responsibilities ...no way a newspaper is going to do a story on a local paper mill that's polluting the local river if the paper's parent group also happens to own the paper mill ...fiscal responsibility to their shareholders and advertisers
 
Holy shit. I do my best to avoid FOX News like the plague, and now I remember why. A friend of mine literally plays that god forsaken channel on every television in his house ... and I truly witnessed the guy become increasingly ignorant (very hard to do, think about it). Now, I'm not going to pretend that there aren't political leanings of other statons (or more accurately shows, as there are shows on CNN that are obviously geared towards the right or left), but never have I seen an entire station that has such an obvious political agenda. This isn't even news, it is pure propaganda fed to the masses.

People are so goddamn stupid.
 
smwScott said:
Holy shit. I do my best to avoid FOX News like the plague, and now I remember why. A friend of mine literally plays that god forsaken channel on every television in his house ... and I truly witnessed the guy become increasingly ignorant (very hard to do, think about it). Now, I'm not going to pretend that there aren't political leanings of other statons (or more accurately shows, as there are shows on CNN that are obviously geared towards the right or left), but never have I seen an entire station that has such an obvious political agenda. This isn't even news, it is pure propaganda fed to the masses.

People are so goddamn stupid.
Click to expand...

Agreed. To not realize a news channel is either right or left(yeah some new channels are biased towards the left) is pretty ignorant. Also to claim that watching the news makes you ignorant is a pretty dumb comment itself.

Fox is conservative, just like CNN is liberal. It all depends on your point of view, if you lean to the left CNN won't seem as biased because it agrees with you, same with the right and FOX. So take that into consideration next time.
 
...and that's why I bearly watch tv anymore.I rather just get my news and info from the net.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
  • Locked
Talking With a Noob (READ IT, VERY FUNNY)
Replies
8
Views
2K
Hectic Glenn
Hectic Glenn
P
  • Locked
A really funny aim covo
2
Replies
58
Views
2K
Axyon
Axyon
Mr.Reak
Why I am so pathetic (no idea if real or not)
Replies
29
Views
1K
NeptuneUK
NeptuneUK
W
CS:S review/preview/article?
Replies
5
Views
939
WazMeister
W
O
'Michael Moore Hates America' -- reviewed.
6 7 8
Replies
306
Views
10K
K e r b e r o s
K e r b e r o s
Back
Top