Male Circumcision Reduces Female Pleasure

Hah, birth. It's just that since i'm cut, I find it weird for anyone else to have skin there. To me, cut is normal... and superior.
 
To me, cut is normal... and superior.

LOL. I'm where you are now, and trust me when I say there is nothing normal or superior about it. Still if you've never know silk its easy to enthuse about cotton I guess.
 
I only say it's superior because i'll never get to try uncut. ;-;
 
Being cut sounds allot like missing a testicle. Your still a man...but are you a complete man?.
 
I had to go from uncut to cut in my early teens due to a rollback issue. They put you under during the op, but its not good once the meds wear off. Could barely walk for about 3 days and had to be hands free for a month and a half. If you are uncut and you've thought about it I'd say stay where you are.


a 'rollback' issue? it.... didnt roll back?!? must have hurt like **** when you got
an erection.

by the way, UNCUT FTW
 
I had to go from uncut to cut in my early teens due to a rollback issue. They put you under during the op, but its not good once the meds wear off. Could barely walk for about 3 days and had to be hands free for a month and a half. If you are uncut and you've thought about it I'd say stay where you are.

Chill Virus, I didn't really read the entire thread and get into the whole sensitive/insensitive debate much last night (plus it was quite late).

In answer to the question. I think I read someone else somewhere once made the analogy that doing from uncut to cut is like going from Colour TV to Black & White in terms of sensitivity. I would fully support that statement. Back when I was uncut, the exposed head & shaft was incredibly sensitive to touch. After I was cut it took a good month so before I'd gotten desensitised to the feel of clothing against the newly exposed skin. It was pretty painful at times, but yes eventually the skin & head does become way way less sensitive.

If I'd had a choice I'd of stayed uncut, however that just wasn't an option.

Dude, pretty much exactly the same with me. Phimosis?

For me, I wouldn't say its any more or less pleasurable, but I always felt that the orgasms felt different.
 
I wouldn't want that intense feeling, orgasms make you spaz out enough as it is. God that must suck.

I imagine it like when a girl won't stop touching it in the most sensitive area immediately after an orgasm, making you jump with convolutions. She thinks you like it. NO. Stop bitch. When I regain control of my body I'm going to make you stop.
 
So this thread is basically just people (with the exception of Kadayi) trying to find justifications of why the way they are is best?

How enlightening.
 
this thread is fun

my dipstick was cut and I'm quite happy with the outcum
 
I see what you did there.
 
I've got the best of both worlds. I was cut at birth, but thanks to my excessive and endless masturbation over the years I now have about a third to a half of my foreskin back.
 
So this thread is basically just people (with the exception of Kadayi) trying to find justifications of why the way they are is best?

How enlightening.
No, it's more like trying to find out which is better for what so we can be optimistic (look on the bright side) about what we've got, plus lots of trolling.
 
n2oqax.png
 
Dude, pretty much exactly the same with me. Phimosis?

For me, I wouldn't say its any more or less pleasurable, but I always felt that the orgasms felt different.

Yes, but not quite as extreme as the pics in the link though (poor bastards).
 
we aren't talking about how long you can stroke your own cock VIRGIN.

It won't be so easy when you are ****ing the girl of your dreams. Have a nice 15 seconds. That's if you can even get your dick in her before you come

Just cause you did doesn't mean we all will :angel:
Wait, so you uncut guys have a MOIST penis head? Is that what I'm understanding here?
Yes, otherwise rollback would be AIEEEEEEEEEEEEE. (And its more like half the effect of lotion, not wet per say)
I only say it's superior because i'll never get to try uncut. ;-;
Take a look at the penn and teller bullshit!: Circumcision, near the end a guy explains how he got all of his foreskin grow back.
 
Couldn't it be fixed by an incision?

you can't cut a bigger hole I'm afraid, because the foreskin its effectively a circular flap of skin that sheathes the penis all the way around and inside and out (at rest its effectively 2 layers of skin forming the hood). In a normal situation this flap of skin should retract fully to allow the glans to be exposed, but in my case this didn't happen because the hood hadn't expanded as I'd grown. Needless to say erections were pretty painful, because the foreskin was constantly taut when I was at attention (sex was a delicate rather than rough thing accordingly) . It is possible to address these things with steroids apparently, but unfortunately in my case surgery was required. Effectively they cut away the entire hood (about 3.5 -5 inches of skin given that its inside and out) and then stitched together the skin just beneath the glans to the skin of the shaft. Left me with some killer scarring as well (one advantage of having it done when your a baby is the scarring fades).

If your feeling a little queasy right now, don't be alarmed its understandable. When the doctor explained it to me at the consult I was like 'for reals?...':rolleyes:
 
My body produces a natural lubricant. Unfortunately it is caustic and only I have skin that is not damaged by it.
 
The fuck are you talking about, Deathmaster? I know I don't have a lotion penis.
well if you're uncut then you do to some degree, either that or fapping must really hurt. I'm guessing the cutfags are dry as shit which is why lotion is so popular.
 
Do you have some kind of sandpaper foreskin? Cuz my skin just moves.
 
Back
Top