Kadayi
Newbie
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2003
- Messages
- 6,034
- Reaction score
- 0
I like not having skin on the head of my weiner.
When were you cut exactly?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I like not having skin on the head of my weiner.
To me, cut is normal... and superior.
I had to go from uncut to cut in my early teens due to a rollback issue. They put you under during the op, but its not good once the meds wear off. Could barely walk for about 3 days and had to be hands free for a month and a half. If you are uncut and you've thought about it I'd say stay where you are.
I had to go from uncut to cut in my early teens due to a rollback issue. They put you under during the op, but its not good once the meds wear off. Could barely walk for about 3 days and had to be hands free for a month and a half. If you are uncut and you've thought about it I'd say stay where you are.
Chill Virus, I didn't really read the entire thread and get into the whole sensitive/insensitive debate much last night (plus it was quite late).
In answer to the question. I think I read someone else somewhere once made the analogy that doing from uncut to cut is like going from Colour TV to Black & White in terms of sensitivity. I would fully support that statement. Back when I was uncut, the exposed head & shaft was incredibly sensitive to touch. After I was cut it took a good month so before I'd gotten desensitised to the feel of clothing against the newly exposed skin. It was pretty painful at times, but yes eventually the skin & head does become way way less sensitive.
If I'd had a choice I'd of stayed uncut, however that just wasn't an option.
No.
nochar
No, it's more like trying to find out which is better for what so we can be optimistic (look on the bright side) about what we've got, plus lots of trolling.So this thread is basically just people (with the exception of Kadayi) trying to find justifications of why the way they are is best?
How enlightening.
Dude, pretty much exactly the same with me. Phimosis?
For me, I wouldn't say its any more or less pleasurable, but I always felt that the orgasms felt different.
Yes, but not quite as extreme as the pics in the link though (poor bastards).
we aren't talking about how long you can stroke your own cock VIRGIN.
It won't be so easy when you are ****ing the girl of your dreams. Have a nice 15 seconds. That's if you can even get your dick in her before you come
Yes, otherwise rollback would be AIEEEEEEEEEEEEE. (And its more like half the effect of lotion, not wet per say)Wait, so you uncut guys have a MOIST penis head? Is that what I'm understanding here?
Take a look at the penn and teller bullshit!: Circumcision, near the end a guy explains how he got all of his foreskin grow back.I only say it's superior because i'll never get to try uncut. ;-;
Couldn't it be fixed by an incision?
I dunno, I am not having an issue pleasuring women...maybe the other cuts are doing it wrong.
Man, its such a sausage fest in here.
you sneaky bastard, didn't notice the avatar change, I thought you were "one of them".
Then why was that jackass going on about MOISTness? He probably has some kind of dog penis in a sheath.
The fuck are you talking about, Deathmaster? I know I don't have a lotion penis.Yes, otherwise rollback would be AIEEEEEEEEEEEEE. (And its more like half the effect of lotion, not wet per say)
well if you're uncut then you do to some degree, either that or fapping must really hurt. I'm guessing the cutfags are dry as shit which is why lotion is so popular.The fuck are you talking about, Deathmaster? I know I don't have a lotion penis.