Jerry_111
Newbie
- Joined
- May 19, 2003
- Messages
- 950
- Reaction score
- 0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I'm not really sure what was going on there. Sounds like they thought he had a weapon or something.
And they thought the phone was a pinata, so its perfectly understandable
Where is the phone even smashed,
If you were expecting to see the phone get smashed without its memory card... on the recording made using said phone... then... come on ace.
The point remains, I was expecting another video from a different perspective or something. It says a phone is smashed in the title, but no where after that.
Images of last week's fatal police shooting in Miami Beach have been released.
Here you see footage recorded on a cell phone by Narces Benoit.
The police are surrounding a car driven by Raymond Herisse. Then they started firing at the 22-year-old.
Herisse was killed, three officers and four bystanders were injured.
Benoit and his girlfriend, Ericka Davis, are accusing authorities of destroying evidence and intimidation.
They say the only reason this video is still around because they were able to hide a memory card before authorities smashed the phone that captured this incident.
They have hired a lawyer, saying they "want the right thing to be done."
I think the biggest issue here is cops waving guns directly at bystanders and unlawfully confiscating and destroying evidence. (there's nothing illegal about filming in a public place).
The point remains, I was expecting another video from a different perspective or something. It says a phone is smashed in the title, but no where after that.
Not only is the law banning taping of police one of the stupidest laws we've come up with yet (and thats saying something) but what should happen is the opposite, requiring police to have a video camera running during any incident. Dashboard cameras are the right idea, but they need to be publicly available. In the future they should also have cameras in their lapel or something too. Officers of the law must be held responsible for their actions just as anybody else.
Here there is, in fact you cant legally videotape police dumbasses at all
It's against the law now to film police officers? Last I knew as long as you were on public property taping and weren't interfering (standing in their way) you had every right to tape them.
The legal justification for arresting the "shooter" rests on existing wiretapping or eavesdropping laws, with statutes against obstructing law enforcement sometimes cited. Illinois, Massachusetts, and Maryland are among the 12 states in which all parties must consent for a recording to be legal unless, as with TV news crews, it is obvious to all that recording is underway. Since the police do not consent, the camera-wielder can be arrested. Most all-party-consent states also include an exception for recording in public places where "no expectation of privacy exists" (Illinois does not) but in practice this exception is not being recognized.
Glik captured a police action on his cellphone to document what he considered to be excessive force. He was not only arrested, his phone was also seized.
On his website Drew wrote, "Myself and three other artists who documented my actions tried for two months to get the police to arrest me for selling art downtown so we could test the Chicago peddlers license law. The police hesitated for two months because they knew it would mean a federal court case. With this felony charge they are trying to avoid this test and ruin me financially and stain my credibility."
Hyde used his recording to file a harassment complaint against the police. After doing so, he was criminally charged.
Myself and three other artists who documented my actions tried for two months to get the police to arrest me for selling art downtown so we could test the Chicago peddlers license law.
False. In Miami it is legal to film police officers performing their duties in a public place.
The phone was destroyed, the guy smuggled the memory card out in his mouth and was even arrested for some stupid charge like resisting arrest or obstruction of justice. It has been confirmed on several news sources (this was all over reddit yesterday) that his phone and many other people's phones were destroyed by police on the scene.
Cops are pretty sensitive about being filmed, and they are very sensitive and defensive about situations where officers are hurt or injured (like here) so I'm not surprised by this at all. Miami police have a history of getting mad at people for filming them and confiscating or destroying their phones unlawfully by saying it was harassment or some other stupid shit like that.