Majestic XII
Tank
- Joined
- May 18, 2003
- Messages
- 3,796
- Reaction score
- 1
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?threadid=17229767&perpage=40&pagenumber=5
Very interesting if you ask me.
Very interesting if you ask me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Abom said:Call me a wuss, but I'd rather spend the little extra rather than risking screwing a brand new card up. Plus from reading on, it seems to be a half-and-half success rate.
Cybernoid said:People who can afford to break an X800 can afford to buy the XT version, I'd imagine.
True but it OCs very well.Pobz said:You're forgetting the non-XT version has cheaper + slower RAM modules on board
Because the XT can't OC as well at all.Pobz said:But if you know how to overclock, why get a pro and overclock to XT, when you can get XT and overclock to Uber-XT
Asus said:Because the XT can't OC as well at all.
hyenolie said:for this example you are right
i've just found that the original method that we were introduced to is WRONG. DO NOT SCRATCH THE CARD AT ALL. i've found that the points we were scratching off IS the actual contact points and that there is no 'coating' as we were mislead to believe.
i grabbed my trichome microscope, 30x, and looked at the 'dull' points, and they are in fact copper. which leads me to believe that the mod didn't work for so many because, we scratched off the contact points.
Mods and Posters please remove the links to the ocUK 'guides', we should look into this to see if we were intentionally mislead. it just sucks that all the ones that tried the mod have permanently disabled those 4 pipes.
And then end up wrecking your card and having to spend $400 on another one, if you that much money to risk you should have enough to spend the extra $100.MaxiKana said:To save 100-200$?