NASA hacker tells all

[Greatgat]

...high res? But what about a transcript. I've read excerpts on BBC.com, but not the whole thing.

 

[Remus]

That's the thing: all my instincts tell me not to believe this guy and pass him off as a loony, but on the other hand I do want to believe what he is saying. One aspect we will be able to check within seven to ten years are the anti-gravity devices. According to the hacker dude, these will appear very soon.

So I guess we'll be seeing in 10 years anti gravity devices compete on the market with hyper drive ships .

 

[Shakermaker]

So I guess we'll be seeing in 10 years anti gravity devices compete on the market with hyper drive ships .

The guy litterally says anti gravity will be a reality in seven to ten years time. So if he is not bullshitting us and he interpreted everything he saw while hacking NASA truthfully, anti gravity is just around the corner.

The thing is: it'll prolly be a much more mundane thing when (or rather: if) it arrives. Example: there is a satellite with an ion drive. It sounds very nifty & scifi and in theory it will travel at a large speed once it gets going (FYI: that will be in a couple of decades), but right now it's little more than an experiment.

 

[Remus]

About the hyper drive ships I wasn't joking, there are some guys that say they're gonna have a working test hyper space engine in the next 5 years:rolling:

 

[Mechagodzilla]

I hacked into NASA and all I got was this lousy t-shirt.

Seriously though, come on. Why didn't he throw Bigfoot and Scalar Waves into his laundry-list of conspiracy tropes?
And no proof at all. Not even a print-screen.

Why does there even need to be a conspiracy, when the self-styled researchers trying to fight the powa are all so terribly inept?

 

[DEATH eVADER]

About the hyper drive ships I wasn't joking, there are some guys that say they're gonna have a working test hyper space engine in the next 5 years:rolling:

That would be a guess, and it wouldn't be from an official.

In my experience, they take their times with these projects

 

[Zeus]

Lol ok...like we're all just supposed to believe this guy.

 

[W4E]

Lol ok...like we're all just supposed to believe this guy.

How much do you believe? Personally i think he DID get onto the machines (at NASA and wherever) based on the fact that what he described could be done using that method.

My dad works for a company who are in conjunction with NASA, and he said that he knows of people who use blank administrator passwords (important people, not just the windowcleaner).

They are some very credible, relied upon people, all saying yes, there is UFO technology, there's anti-gravity, there's free energy, and it's extra-terrestrial in origin, and we've captured spacecraft and reverse-engineered it.

It depends how you interpret it, UFO doesnt mean alien, anti-gravity can be a magnet. Free energy? Well the sun is said to be free energy and is technically extra-terrestrial (ter·res·tri·al (tə-rĕs'trē-əl) adj. 1. Of or relating to the earth or its inhabitants.)
Captured a spacecraft and reverse engineered it? This could easily have been referring to "spacecrafts" made in other countries (eg. russia).

On the other hand: When asked about whether or not he got evidence he starts stuttering and looks like hes lying / making excuses.
Also when hes talking about the non-man made sattelite photo he says "It was above the Earth's hemisphere" whilst drawing an arc underneath with his hands. If you really DID see a picture of some flying object you dont imagine a stylised version with the curved earth underneath with stars in the sky. Its unlikely that the picture he describes would have been taken from such a high angle to show the curvature of earth.

From the arguement about how he could just press print screen: possibly (i really have no clue) the direct feed from the remote viewing software is encypted. Try taking a screenshot of a DVD being played on your pc.