New hl2 review
- Thread starter killerteoz
- Start date
Homercidal
Newbie
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2003
- Messages
- 399
- Reaction score
- 0
MrMetroid says: The reviewer was paid by Valve for that review. Can't you people open your eyes to the way the system works? it goes like this:
Valve allows reviewers to play the game in their offices.
Reviewer plays it and says "meh"
Valve says "Here, sit down and have a nice spaghetti dinner, on us. All the wine you can drink. And don't forget to look in your pocket BEFORE you write the review."
Too bad he's not here to give us the devils advocate vote.
Valve allows reviewers to play the game in their offices.
Reviewer plays it and says "meh"
Valve says "Here, sit down and have a nice spaghetti dinner, on us. All the wine you can drink. And don't forget to look in your pocket BEFORE you write the review."
Too bad he's not here to give us the devils advocate vote.
S
Star
Guest
Hi guys, I've read the review and i can confirm the 9/10 score.
BTW it's written that the score should be 10/10 but only time will say, it's the policy of the magazine.
BTW it's written that the score should be 10/10 but only time will say, it's the policy of the magazine.
X
Xilema
Guest
SFLUFAN said:
No decinal score.
X
Xilema
Guest
b3ll4L! said:like every article published by future media magazines
hi xilema I know you! you are (were?) a TGMOL user!
Yes, I'm... or well... I was :E
S
Star
Guest
Yes, now he do the troll on the hwupgrade.it forum!
X
Xilema
Guest
Star said:Yes, now he do the troll on the hwupgrade.it forum!
Who are you ???
P.S. Suvvia, rivela la tua identità :cheers:
Karis
Newbie
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2003
- Messages
- 110
- Reaction score
- 0
Subz said:
...I'd say Halo is better than Doom, considering the years they were released.
Doom was a good game, but it just got repetitive. Halo avoided this by, IMO, having a well told story line, throwing new stuff in every now in than, and the co-op just made it insane. Not to mention, no obviously looped sounds.
G
gorman
Guest
Hmmm... well... no, not exactly. Or, actually, not at all. *We* paid for the flight, *we* paid for the accomodation. We wrote the review only when we were back in Italy and in the review we definitely speak about weaknesses of the game, not only praises.Homercidal said:MrMetroid says: The reviewer was paid by Valve for that review. Can't you people open your eyes to the way the system works? it goes like this:
Valve allows reviewers to play the game in their offices.
Reviewer plays it and says "meh"
Valve says "Here, sit down and have a nice spaghetti dinner, on us. All the wine you can drink. And don't forget to look in your pocket BEFORE you write the review."
Too bad he's not here to give us the devils advocate vote.
On the other hand, if by "the reviewer was paid by Valve for that review" you meant that our writer received money from Valve to give a good review, you are doing two things:
1) Offending a friend of mine, who has worked with me, in total moral integrity, for more than ten years.
2) Extending your own moral indequancy to others.
The first would piss me off, the second would be just plain sad.
KagePrototype
Tank
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2003
- Messages
- 6,356
- Reaction score
- 1
Karis said:Doom was a good game, but it just got repetitive. Halo avoided this by, IMO, having a well told story line, throwing new stuff in every now in than, and the co-op just made it insane. Not to mention, no obviously looped sounds.
Halo...not..repetitive? :|
/me explodes
kaf11
Newbie
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2004
- Messages
- 2,100
- Reaction score
- 0
Karis said:...I'd say Halo is better than Doom, considering the years they were released.
Doom was a good game, but it just got repetitive. Halo avoided this by, IMO, having a well told story line, throwing new stuff in every now in than, and the co-op just made it insane. Not to mention, no obviously looped sounds.
yeah, you know that old trick of making you return to the same levels is a great strategy for keeping things unrepetative.
Similar threads
