Pacific Assault Verdict. (minor spoiler warning)

BabyHeadCrab

The Freeman
Joined
Dec 2, 2003
Messages
23
Reaction score
602
I bought this game half skeptical of the quality considering EA's choppiness and the lack of quality and polish showed in the demo renditions of the game. I must say now that i've had a chance to run through the first few sp missions, im more then impressed.. I'm ducking for cover from Japanese Zero's.

Ok the game starts you off in an action packed beach raid scenario showing off the cinimated quality and novelesque plot centering around a all-american protagonist that anyone drafted into a war could become. The mission lasts for a little while allowing you to operate a 50 cal and mow down some boats / japs on a dock to the left of you, btw the havok 2.0 in sp is simply stunning / fun the ragdolls and amount of things that can be destroyed is rediculous.

It then becomes apparent that the game is a flashback of sorts and (2 yrs earlier) is the caption and you are explained the brutality and purpose of the marine core and why it was formed and why it remains such a force to be reckoned with (there a a pertiuclarly beutiful cgi showing a ceremonial ritual of Marine Core marching before the Pearn Harbor mission which comes right after the first mission).

Pearl Harbor was stunning, you are introduced to a man who guides you around showing you tropical up-beat navy base, every seems to have a task you see people mending a roof soldiers doing sit-ups and people sitting in benches, on one instance you even have to stop to calm down some naughty soldiers who are reading sharing a diry magazine with one-another. The game makes you feel like you are living as this man during this period of time.

I was amazed at the sheer amount of activity that was going on around me, simply stunned and the graphics quality of everything. Other people's gun models are detailed like i've never seem before in a wwII shooter you can literally see fingers on triggers as apposed to most games even now. Ok now that i'm done ranting on graphics, eventually everything goes to hell in Pearl Harbor and you are forced to complete objective that include blasting zeroes away on aa guns manning a multi man flakk crew to destroy as many jap planes as possible and saving a ship from sinking by breaking doors open with an axe and closing steam valves and opening water release switches.

The most impressive thing about the entire experience is take one look around you and it's war... people are dying everywhere people are sliding off the decks of ships to there deaths bodies float lifelessly by the hunreds, and planes coat the sky in unprecedented numbers. There is simply no way to explain to you people the cinimatic beuty of this mission. The bootcamp introduces you to your spunky rag tag team that you get to know throughout the sp expierience. The exposions/particle/smoke looks better then i've ever seen in a pc game hands down. I'm too lazy to make this a full fledged review but... also mp impressions so far: no more mouse lag, improved server lag, seems like theres a lack of physics :( , but fun objective based (like ET but more dynamic/fun) the whole expierience is a blast..literally (sorry)

BUY MOH: PA... now!
 
Jesus Lincoln said:
the demo sucked
That it did. There's just something about this game that turns me off, i dunno...probably the way the player walked and moved, just didnt feel proper...meh...Im definately not buying it.
 
Honestly, I'm sure it's a good game and all, but I for one am absolutely sick of WW2/Vietnam style games. Sick of them.
 
Would you recommend it to someone who thought MoH and CoD were dreadfully average??
 
Warbie said:
Would you recommend it to someone who thought MoH and CoD were dreadfully average??

CoD was dreadfully average??!?! WTF?

MoH, i agree... but CoD? WTF, dude.... WTF. :|
 
I also have Pacific assault and it's awesome...great team based game..also awesome sound and graphics..also a very challenging game.
 
thehunter1320 said:
CoD was dreadfully average??!?! WTF?

MoH, i agree... but CoD? WTF, dude.... WTF. :|

Ya man MoH blows monkey sack and what would you expect from
EA? But for Call Of Duty, whoever said it sucks obviously haven't played it much or just hate WWll games. Call of Duty is probably the best WWll game out.
 
it's actually quite different from the rest of the wwII games out right now, more squad based, more animations for everything. I especially love the medic / shellshock / incapacitation system. Every member of your squad is important. In MP as well.
 
I played the demo and I though it sucked. I dunno if anyone caught the Gamespy review but they're on the money with the combat. It's an incredibly linear game with crappy combat imo. Then again I've only played the demo, it's not a true indication of the full thing.
 
thehunter1320 said:
CoD was dreadfully average??!?! WTF?

MoH, i agree... but CoD? WTF, dude.... WTF. :|

COD only had an excellent sound design. The action was okay, but seriously it was something you could have finished within 2 days...
 
A game that is linear without trying to hide the fact that it's linear, enemies appearing right infront of you and suddenly jabbing you in the stomach with a bayonette, you might as well watch the Arnie movie 'Predator'.
 
colson said:
Ya man MoH blows monkey sack and what would you expect from
EA? But for Call Of Duty, whoever said it sucks obviously haven't played it much or just hate WWll games. Call of Duty is probably the best WWll game out.
LMAO... MOH:AA and COD are almost the same.

COD is just an evolution of Allied Assault.
 
CoD sucked. Started off cool, but then it just turned into a corridor shooter. I dunno, just something about being a one man army doesn't feel right. takes me out of the immersion.
 
Mac said:
CoD sucked. Started off cool, but then it just turned into a corridor shooter. I dunno, just something about being a one man army doesn't feel right. takes me out of the immersion.

That's what bugged me about the Russian and parts of the British campaign. They set you on your own too much and down small corridors. I liked the feel of squads and teamwork in the U.S. campaign a lot though.
 
lans said:
COD only had an excellent sound design. The action was okay, but seriously it was something you could have finished within 2 days...

So? The maps are all fun, but I do agree the game was short. The mp makes up for the length of the game in my opinion.
 
ShadowFox said:
LMAO... MOH:AA and COD are almost the same.

COD is just an evolution of Allied Assault.

Call of Duty is way better! I don't care what you say CoD is by far a better game. I played allied assault for maybe an hour and got bored of it.
 
The only thing about PA is that after the totally amazing pearl harbour level it then proceeds to stick you in hour after hour of repetetive jungle crawl, essentially the first couple missions are awesome and the last mission is awesome, but the rest is mediocre. Oh and the load times are painful, and it doesn't run very well on any machine.

In spite of all this i am still enjoying it, but that's just me....I don't know how willing i would be to recommend it to others though.
 
i liked the demo, it gave a good overview of some of the additions in mohpa.
 
colson said:
Call of Duty is way better! I don't care what you say CoD is by far a better game. I played allied assault for maybe an hour and got bored of it.
Were you by any chance covering your ears when you read my post?

Did you play Allied Assault when it came out or much after the fact? COD added more squad action, but the fact is they both are set-piece shooters.

I love em both, but they aren't very different.
 
Poor guys, they are not getting a lot of attention, with HL2 and halo 2 on the way, WW2 is over. They took to long also.
 
CoD:UO makes up for that "Corridor" kinda of comat. I don't think you are ever on your own in any one part of the game. The AI is kinda shabby at times, but it's still alot of fun. If nothing else, buy the game for the first British campaign mission..........Dear GOD now THAT was fun.
 
Bait said:
CoD:UO makes up for that "Corridor" kinda of comat. I don't think you are ever on your own in any one part of the game. The AI is kinda shabby at times, but it's still alot of fun. If nothing else, buy the game for the first British campaign mission..........Dear GOD now THAT was fun.
UO is a great game
MP is where it's at
 
It chugged wayyyyyy too much in the demo for me to even consider buying it.
 
The only time I had fun on PA demo is when I turned off the cross, and the hud completely. Made the game 10x better.
 
thehunter1320 said:
CoD was dreadfully average??!?! WTF?

MoH, i agree... but CoD? WTF, dude.... WTF. :|
It'll have to second that exclamation. CoD/=dreadfully average.
 
Back
Top