people having sex in bathroom...oh the HUMANITY!!

[jverne]

http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=321873


think of the children!!

the crying part was really awesome "and I, and I can't do that now".



BREAKING NEWS: public restaurants are installing automated turrets in toilets that target male testicles!

 

[CptStern]

that's a lot of naked tacos

 

[CyberPitz]

Oh lord, that is hilarious. You know the guy is lying.."I wouldn't want to see that!"

Gosh, people really need to stop being pussies. Sex is natural...get over it.

*EDIT* Lock doors...? Self locking doors...? Geez, over-reacting.

 

[Mellish]

This is news?

 

[Farrowlesparrow]

As much as I'd like to say that people should be free to have sex wherever they choose, surely having sex in front of little children is not something we should encourage.
I wasn't sure though, were the group doing it in a cubicle or out in the main path of the toilets?

 

[Dodo]

I'd love to stuble upon 2 girls in 1 toilet. Lol.
2 girls 1 Toilet.
ha!

-dodo

 

[lefty]

And then they recap in front of the five year old.

 

[CyberPitz]

As much as I'd like to say that people should be free to have sex wherever they choose, surely having sex in front of little children is not something we should encourage.
I wasn't sure though, were the group doing it in a cubicle or out in the main path of the toilets?

Well, according to the vid, the guy said "Then they came back and said two girls and two guys were coming out and making funny noises."

I guess that means they were in the stalls...that's how I took it, at least.

 

[jverne]

As much as I'd like to say that people should be free to have sex wherever they choose, surely having sex in front of little children is not something we should encourage.
I wasn't sure though, were the group doing it in a cubicle or out in the main path of the toilets?

of course not, silly them...children should not be allowed to witness nature's most common and necessary need.

 

[CyberPitz]

Well, we are only on this earth to screw....

 

[CptStern]

oh come on, I'm all for sex but to suggest that kids seeing people having sex in a public restroom is ok is beyond ridiculous


would it be ok if the couple was gay? what if they were sado masochists or scat fetishists? what if they were simply obese and very unattrative? should this be children's first exposure to sex?

 

[CyberPitz]

What if it wasn't the girls servicing the men, but some weird homosexual orgy.

I'm going to Taco Bell, BRB.

Also, I'm not saying they should see it, but they are making one large ruckus over something so small.

 

[Vegeta897]

Stern has a good point.

I for one am definitely going to be there the first time my daughter is exposed to sex, and I'm going to make sure it's good.

 

[jverne]

oh come on, I'm all for sex but to suggest that kids seeing people having sex in a public restroom is ok is beyond ridiculous


would it be ok if the couple was gay? what if they were sado masochists or scat fetishists? what if they were simply obese and very unattrative? should this be children's first exposure to sex?

first of all...yeah i do agree that first introducing them to some hardcore fetishes could end up with some bad impressions.
but we have to understand that those fetishes are not exactly about sex, but many different desires.
if we teach kids at a young age they might not get so negatively affected upon seeing such an act. and i doubt kids under 10 would somehow end up seeing a live performance anyway. by the time they are 13 they pretty much heard it all (in today's digital age), considering the virginity line fell a good deal of years since before the invention of the internet.

and WTF is it with the "would it be ok if the couple was gay?", i didn't expect that from you

 

[MJ12]

I don't think people should just screw in public, we have apartments for that, and I don't think that's how a child should learn about sex.


On another note I burst out laughing at the random hick "I WOULDN'T MIND SEEN DAT"

 

[CptStern]

first of all...yeah i do agree that first introducing them to some hardcore fetishes could end up with some bad impressions.
but we have to understand that those fetishes are not exactly about sex, but many different desires.
if we teach kids at a young age they might not get so negatively affected upon seeing such an act.

kids dont understand sex, how are they going to understand a fetish?



perfect example:

was watching Revenge of the Sith with my 5 yr old son last night. In the scene where anakin cuts off Count Dooku's head with his lightsaber and Dooku's lightsaber my son said

"cool now annakin has two lightsabers"

he didnt understand that Dooku just had his head cut off

and i doubt kids under 10 would somehow end up seeing a live performance anyway. by the time they are 13 they pretty much heard it all (in today's digital age), considering the virginity line fell a good deal of years since before the invention of the internet.

and WTF is it with the "would it be ok if the couple was gay?", i didn't expect that from you

it doesnt matter what MY personal feelings are ..all that matters is what's best for my kids ..and seeing gay sex or any kind of sex is bad because they have absolutely no frame of reference at that age. they dont understand non platonic love, their ONLY experience with love is the love of a parent or in a very rudimentary way the love of a pet. romantic love doesnt not come into play till much later ...however it's MUCH worse if they saw gay sex ..because then I'd have to explain WHY they were doing it. and since there is no reference point for homosexuality in society they wouldnt understand the implication behind the act

 

[MJ12]

perfect example:

was watching Revenge of the Sith with my 5 yr old son last night. In the scene where anakin cuts off Count Dooku's head with his lightsaber and Dooku's lightsaber my son said

"cool now annakin has two lightsabers"

he didnt understand that Dooku just had his head cut off

I am quoting this.

 

[DEATHMASTER]

perfect example:

was watching Revenge of the Sith with my 5 yr old son last night. In the scene where anakin cuts off Count Dooku's head with his lightsaber and Dooku's lightsaber my son said

"cool now annakin has two lightsabers"

he didnt understand that Dooku just had his head cut off

I am quoting this.

I am quoting you quoting this.

 

[Bad^Hat]

"Goes beyond borderline disturbing."

So... it's just disturbing then? :|

 

[VirusType2]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDoQFcQEpOQ[/youtube]

 

[Reginald]

Bwahahaha. The mum's jumper said BUM.

 

[CptStern]

yes B.U.M

http://www.bumequipment.com/

 

[Omnomnick]

"And they were making funny noises."

Why does the woman have "BUM XXL" written on her jumper? Oh wait.

 

[CrazyHarij]

Haha, that's great.

 

[CyberPitz]

yes B.U.M

http://www.bumequipment.com/

F.A.G Bearings... You can only guess how many jokes a day we make about this place here in town. ALSO: One of the radio stations in town has some automated thing that plays every now and then... "It's F A G bearings.....just making sure nobody gets in trouble."
http://www.macraesbluebook.com/search/company.cfm?company=355092

 

[jverne]

kids dont understand sex, how are they going to understand a fetish?



perfect example:

was watching Revenge of the Sith with my 5 yr old son last night. In the scene where anakin cuts off Count Dooku's head with his lightsaber and Dooku's lightsaber my son said

"cool now annakin has two lightsabers"

he didnt understand that Dooku just had his head cut off

maybe he didn't care for the head, because having two lightsabres is way cooler. :E

it doesnt matter what MY personal feelings are ..all that matters is what's best for my kids ..and seeing gay sex or any kind of sex is bad because they have absolutely no frame of reference at that age. they dont understand non platonic love, their ONLY experience with love is the love of a parent or in a very rudimentary way the love of a pet. romantic love doesnt not come into play till much later ...however it's MUCH worse if they saw gay sex ..because then I'd have to explain WHY they were doing it. and since there is no reference point for homosexuality in society they wouldnt understand the implication behind the act

what if you say..."they like each other"? because technically even you don't know why gays are gays, or why people have attraction to each other.

and besides...a 5 year old probably won't make anything out of it unless somebody tells him what's right or wrong.
so how exactly will you teach your kid about sex, i'm really curious?

 

[Gemma]

This is hot, If only we had Taco Bell's here

 

[DEATHMASTER]

Taco bell rules

 

[Asuka]

Owned. I can only imagine the face of the girl. LOL

 

[CptStern]

maybe he didn't care for the head, because having two lightsabres is way cooler. :E

ya yhe was oblivious to the fact dooku had his head cut off. He's not at the point where he even knows what death is

what if you say..."they like each other"? because technically even you don't know why gays are gays, or why people have attraction to each other.

"but why are they kissing daddy, are they going to have a baby? why are they holding hands are they going to go skipping?" "dady why is that man touching the other man's private parts?" ..it's easy for heterosexual couples because he's already been introduced to heterosexual love: he has a mommy and a daddy

and besides...a 5 year old probably won't make anything out of it unless somebody tells him what's right or wrong.
so how exactly will you teach your kid about sex, i'm really curious?

well it certainly wont be "here son watch this movie" ..it's a gradual thing that goes along with his school's sex ed program. parents and teachers work together to provide the neccessary information to help him understand the meaning behind human sexulaity ..otherwise it's just an act ..which in itself isnt a bad thing but much much harder to explain

 

[Kadayi]

of course not, silly them...children should not be allowed to witness nature's most common and necessary need.

Natures most common and necessary need? I think you'll probably find that's voiding your bowels, unless you're a complete stud muffin like me :naughty: :dozey:

oh come on, I'm all for sex but to suggest that kids seeing people having sex in a public restroom is ok is beyond ridiculous

Stern, ignore the 'why ever not?' crowd, they are too contrary to know the absurdity of what they say. I recall in another thread a while back someone proudly proclaiming that they would have no problems leaving their (hypothetical) 5 year old hanging around with 'Uncle Pete' whilst he jacked off to tentacle porn.

 

[Eejit]

"the family is still shaken" What? The kid seemed fine, it was the parents still BAWWWing.

 

[jverne]

"but why are they kissing daddy, are they going to have a baby? why are they holding hands are they going to go skipping?" "dady why is that man touching the other man's private parts?" ..it's easy for heterosexual couples because he's already been introduced to heterosexual love: he has a mommy and a daddy

so you're against gay couples adopting children?




well it certainly wont be "here son watch this movie" ..it's a gradual thing that goes along with his school's sex ed program. parents and teachers work together to provide the neccessary information to help him understand the meaning behind human sexulaity ..otherwise it's just an act ..which in itself isnt a bad thing but much much harder to explain[/QUOTE]

but that doesn't solve the issue of how are you going to explain to him something you don't really understand (gay sex) and neither sex ed.
i'm not saying this is completely wrong, but i doesn't help accepting gay people any better.
seems to me you're worried your kid might learn to be gay, that's why you want him to learn that hetero sex is first and foremost (which technically it is...if you care about the survival of humanity).

 

[Emporius]

OH GOD IT'S AN EPIDEMIC

Way not to lock the door foo'

 

[lefty]

From what I gethered, the kids didn't even see anything, other than two women leaving behind two guys in the bathroom after hearing noises. wut

 

[CptStern]

so you're against gay couples adopting children?

what? where did you get that idea? I certainly didnt say anything of the sort

but that doesn't solve the issue of how are you going to explain to him something you don't really understand (gay sex) and neither sex ed.

sex is only one component of a love relationship. and why would I have to explain gay sex? I only have to explain heterosexual sex as it relates to a biological function ..besides that's what educators are for ..parents just fill in the gaps

i'm not saying this is completely wrong, but i doesn't help accepting gay people any better.

what does? what are you on about? how does gay sex fit into reproductive model that's used to explain the birds and bees. I think the problem is that people assume sex education means a. insert penis into vagine. b profit

when it's almost exclusively about biology. relationships for the most part dont fit into this because it's the emotional component

seems to me you're worried your kid might learn to be gay, that's why you want him to learn that hetero sex is first and foremost (which technically it is...if you care about the survival of humanity).

wow you're really grasping at straws here; you couldnt possibly be further from the truth. no one learns to be gay. you're either gay or you're not. just like you're either heterosexual or you are not. besides human sexual relations isnt a component of sex education; it's almost all on biological issues etc

 

[Emporius]

The very fact tht there are homosexual people proves Stern's point.

 

[kineaesth]

my daughter

Oh no.

Also yeah that's kinda gross. Kinda.

 

[jverne]

what? where did you get that idea? I certainly didnt say anything of the sort

"but why are they kissing daddy, are they going to have a baby? why are they holding hands are they going to go skipping?" "dady why is that man touching the other man's private parts?" ..it's easy for heterosexual couples because he's already been introduced to heterosexual love: he has a mommy and a daddy

what if the parents of the kid were homosexual, would they be the same questions?

this "dady why is that man touching the other man's private parts?" part seemed to me a bit exaggerated and insolent, so it lead me to believe you had an issue with gays adopting children.
the point is...wouldn't a child from a homosexual family have a better affinity to gays?

sex is only one component of a love relationship. and why would I have to explain gay sex? I only have to explain heterosexual sex as it relates to a biological function ..besides that's what educators are for ..parents just fill in the gaps

maybe because gay sex (relationship) is part of nature, part of our society?

what does? what are you on about? how does gay sex fit into reproductive model that's used to explain the birds and bees. I think the problem is that people assume sex education means a. insert penis into vagine. b profit

what i mean to say is that, if we don't present to kids that gay sex (relationship) occurs and that it's not something bad, wrong, unnatural then as grown ups they'll have a harder time accepting it.

when it's almost exclusively about biology. relationships for the most part dont fit into this because it's the emotional component

i wasn't just talking purely about the act of sex, but also the emotions/relationship that comes with it. which seems to me they are bound with each other.

because

why are they holding hands are they going to go skipping?

is no just about biology and reproduction. since when are we talking purely about the biological aspect?

wow you're really grasping at straws here; you couldnt possibly be further from the truth. no one learns to be gay. you're either gay or you're not. just like you're either heterosexual or you are not. besides human sexual relations isnt a component of sex education; it's almost all on biological issues etc

never strictly said that you only learn to be gay, but i bet that someone who is raised in an open and liberal family might get more experimental in his sexual life.
on a side note: how do you explain that in ancient Greece, "boy loving" was the pinnacle of love.
to tell you the truth i'm not entirely sure if homosexuality is a purely biological thing. i think it also has alot to do with psychology and other external influences. for example...some people maybe like to be dominated and find more pleasure from a man than a girl...since it's known that men are more aggressive.
i'm just trying to say it's a complex process and simply saying it's purely biological sounds a tad dismissive.

 

[Kadayi]

Gays!!!

The sexual act in its fullness is an act that ultimately leads to procreation. Anything else is just group masturbation when you boil it down to its essence. How people float their boat is entirely up to them, but contrary to popular belief, the notion that homosexuality is anything more than a personal sexual predilection is a mistaken one (the 'gay' gene theory was a myth). There is nothing natural about it. You might as well argue that Furries or autophiles should be allowed equal rights.

Given the above, and the fact that young children are easily influenced by the behaviour of their parents and surrounding adults there are hard questions to be asked regarding allowing homosexual couples to raise children. Rightly or wrongly the principal should always be how will that impact upon the child concerned, not on the rights of consenting adults to be allowed to raise a family.

If a child was being subjected to graphic homosexual acts everyday, I'd say that probably wouldn't be a good environment to bring them up in (likewise if it was graphic heterosexual acts) .