BabyHeadCrab
The Freeman
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2003
- Messages
- 23
- Reaction score
- 602
Siberia (PC)
Onimusha 1-3 (ps2)
UT2k4 and mods
World of Warcraft
Onimusha 1-3 (ps2)
UT2k4 and mods
World of Warcraft
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
babyheadcrab said:Siberia (PC)
Onimusha 1-3 (ps2)
UT2k4 and mods
World of Warcraft
The second Prince of Persia (Warrior Within) is on the dark side. But the time travel concept made up for it. Besides, I played it because I liked The Sands of Time. The Two Thrones was nothing like the second one.AiM said:Well your tastes are very...awkward? (lack of a better word) If I remember correctly, isn't the last two Prince of Persia games a bit on the 'dark' side?
There's some great games on the newer consoles, Shadow of the Collosus, God of War, Metal Gear Solid 2 / 3, Resident Evil 4, etc.
JNightshade said:Well, then, your options are pretty limited.
Emn1ty said:Halo, for console i mean, dont get the PC version, it sucks pretty bad.
Isn't it genetic that Koreans think Starcraft is the best game ever?15357 said:Starcraft. Best ****ing game before HL2.
I have to highly disagree.xlucidx said:Don't get Advent Rising, the game is pure over-hyped shit.
Don't get Halo PC, no matter what kind of computer you have... chances are that it'll run slower than your grandmother on fly paper.
Halo on the xbox is great fun, good get-together game.
Stigmata said:Ragdoll Masters
Addictive little 2D ragdoll fighter. It's no Half-Life or Fallout, but it gets the job done.
Fliko said:I have to highly disagree.
I spent hours doing stunts on Halo PC, and with the Source code out and easy to change, it made more stunts easy, and opened up new ways of gameplay. It is awesome on the PC due to multiplayer. You can't play Halo on Xbox live. My 1.7 GHz, 256 MB SDRam, and nVidia 4 SE ran it fine, no choppyness. That computer wasn't tooken care of to.
Advent Rising was an awesome game I suppose. It was worthy of my time, though it was over-hyped and it is buggy, they are some really cool battles in it. You just have to play it all the way through.
Lou said:Is Zelda only available for the Nintendo 64?
AiM said:Meh I don't understand your anti-console sentiment but regardless, maybe you should put in the criteria / format of games you like rather than dislike? The list of games you had earlier doesn't sync up to one another, GTA and Half Life series are head and shoulders above the other two you mentioned.
Lou said:as opposed to a bunch of independent levels almost unrelated to one another (like Max Payne 2).
Lou said:My only anti-console sentiment is that I don't have a console, and I don't plan to buy one just to play a couple of good games and then never use it again. I might buy a Nintendo Revolution if the controller system turns out to be as revolutionary as advertized, and not just an annoying gimmick.
I like games like the ones I mentioned. They must meet the following criteria:
1) There is a good storyline (like Half Life, Prince of Persia), as opposed to a bunch of independent levels almost unrelated to one another (like Max Payne 2).
2) It's a FPS or a TPS.
3) It's not a (2D) strategy game (like Diablo or The Sims).
4) It's not a MMORPG.
5) It's not impossibly difficult to finish. An example is Donkey Kong 64 (I had a console back then). I invested countless hours of work into this game only to end up completely frustrated when I reached the final boss, which was next to impossible to defeat.
6) It's in good taste. I don't like satanic games like Doom or Quake or Daikatana. I don't like 'scary' video games either (that's why I didn't like the Ravenholm level of HL2).
Lou said:My only anti-console sentiment is that I don't have a console, and I don't plan to buy one just to play a couple of good games and then never use it again. I might buy a Nintendo Revolution if the controller system turns out to be as revolutionary as advertized, and not just an annoying gimmick.
I like games like the ones I mentioned. They must meet the following criteria:
1) There is a good storyline (like Half Life, Prince of Persia), as opposed to a bunch of independent levels almost unrelated to one another (like Max Payne 2).
2) It's a FPS or a TPS.
3) It's not a (2D) strategy game (like Diablo or The Sims).
4) It's not a MMORPG.
5) It's not impossibly difficult to finish. An example is Donkey Kong 64 (I had a console back then). I invested countless hours of work into this game only to end up completely frustrated when I reached the final boss, which was next to impossible to defeat.
6) It's in good taste. I don't like satanic games like Doom or Quake or Daikatana. I don't like 'scary' video games either (that's why I didn't like the Ravenholm level of HL2).
AiM said:Not sure what's a TPS...
Krynn72 said:Third person shooter I believe.
I might suggest Indigo prophecy. Its not a shooter neccesarily, but a 3rd person adventure game. Its got a excelent story, not an mmo, not impossible, and in good taste (well, in every good story there is a evil bit, but its not a focal point, nor is it over-the-top).