Richard Dawkins to Appear on the O'Reilly Factor

[kirovman]

Hitler liked to go on about Conservative Christian values a lot:

http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler

My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Saviour as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognised these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God’s truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. Today, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognise more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow my self to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice...and if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly it is the distress that daily grows. For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people.

* Speech in Munich (12 April 1922)

 

[The Brick]

Unlike the O RLY debate, this one is interesting.

[youtube]QS2TFVe9LDc[/youtube]

 

[DeusExMachina]

But in all likelihood, Hitler was probably atheist.

But that really doesn't mean anything. How many Christians have dealt the hand of death to millions of people? If he really wanted to use a dictator, he should've picked Stalin. He killed more people than Hitler ever did. His own people nevertheless.

 

[Absinthe]

But in all likelihood, Hitler was probably atheist.

I don't even think probably. Hitler picked and chose which parts of religion he liked, for sure. But that's what the average Christian does.

Frankly, I think the whole thing just ceased to apply in his mind, as he eventually came to psychotically envision himself as a man of utter supremacy. Or he was a religious pluralist. None of this has to make sense, you see.

 

[mindless_moder]

this is just ridiculous, he doesn't even make an attempt at having a serious discussion with well thought out arguments.

 

[Gray Fox]

this is just ridiculous, he doesn't even make an attempt at having a serious discussion with well thought out arguments.

Is it even possible to have thought out arguments for religion.
I would think if religious people took the time to think their arguments trough they would stop being religious.

 

[brink's]

Is it even possible to have thought out arguments for religion.
I would think if religious people took the time to think their arguments trough they would stop being religious.

Umm...you can't disprove christianity...duhhhhh

 

[Jintor]

What?

 

[No Limit]

Man, why didn't Dawkins mention Islam instead of Greek gods, that would have been great.

 

[Gray Fox]

Man, why didn't Dawkins mention Islam instead of Greek gods, that would have been great.

Well Islam and Christianity share the same god, it would just lend strength to 'O Reilly's arguments.

 

[Polaris]

Most idiotic video about Dr.Dawkins EVER:
[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79dB5148SFU[/YOUTUBE]
It's about how Dawkins was raised in very wealthy family with slaves(?), he have same rogue personality like Hitler and he is asshole, anti-social, etc.

 

[dream431ca]

Glen Beck and O'Reilly would make good buddies...they both are biased and hate to be corrected....Ok, almost every major news station in the US is biased one way or another.

 

[Sulkdodds]

I cannot stand that man's voice.