Saddam caught with his kecks down

"Pics to get off to"

Or not.

Hawt, he has a pink chair. Kinky.
 
I was going to mention it but I've spent most of the day going to Estate agents and driving from Edinburgh to Middlesbrough.
 
Heh, if he gets enough money from the legal action, maybe he can buy his bail.
 
kirovman said:
Heh, if he gets enough money from the legal action, maybe he can buy his bail.
u never know, but i do think that he should get a little bit more respect
 
iyfyoufhl said:
if i was him i'd sue too

If I was him, I would try to be as nice to America as I could, before we turn him over to middle east countries for "Questioning"
 
The Sun is absolutely disgusting, Saddam Hussein may be an evil tyrant, but everyone deserves their dignity, even if he didn't show that same dignity to his people.
 
Dag said:
If I was him, I would try to be as nice to America as I could, before we turn him over to middle east countries for "Questioning"
if i was SH i wouldn't be nice to anybody
 
iyfyoufhl said:
if i was SH i wouldn't be nice to anybody

I would, considering the second he gets sent back to the Mid-East for Questioning, he ain't gonna be very happy, as the Mid-East uses much more "Persuasive" questioning than we do. :cheese:
 
Dag said:
I would, considering the second he gets sent back to the Mid-East for Questioning, he ain't gonna be very happy, as the Mid-East uses much more "Persuasive" questioning than we do. :cheese:

Sent back? So where is he now? Renting an appartment in NYC?
 
haha I thought this was great, screw human rights, after what he did he doesn't deserve dignity.. Makes me laugh how everyone is getting so upset over it, completely forgetting that given chance he'd do far worse for no reason.
 
Only in the Western World to people get upset that a tyrant dictator, who is responsible for thousands of deaths and rampant torture, because he was seen in his underwear.
 
Dag said:
Only in the Western World to people get upset that a tyrant dictator, who is responsible for thousands of deaths and rampant torture, because he was seen in his underwear.
yeah, makes you wonder how the hell we win any wars, collective bunch of wimpish ladyboys, crying over photo's of criminals who don't happen to have a plasma TV in their cells like we give to all our mass murderers.
 
well I can see how they might get offended ...this sort of stuff spurs terrorist groups who rely on propaganda to fuel their fighters
 
Thats not why most people get offended. Most people get offended because it's considered "Inhumane" or "Cruel" to the former dictator, which is funny, because despite the fact that he murdered thousands, people think he should be forgiven. But the propoganda is a double-edged sword. It also shows that the once powerful leader of Iraq has been reduced to that, and so will further terrorists if the keep up thier actions.
 
what you guys don't understand is that we have to keep our diginity and respect him to show how civil society lives, evil only produces evil, we have to set an example

by the way, read Suddam's background, and you'll find out why he did things that he did
 
iyfyoufhl said:
what you guys don't understand is that we have to keep our diginity and respect him to show how civil society lives, evil only produces evil, we have to set an example

by the way, read Suddam's background, and you'll find out why he did things that he did

Whatever reasons he had, I somehow don't think they were good enough to sacrifice thousands of Kurdish Women and children.
 
The Sun will get owned by the courts. They're a dispicable newspaper. I saw it today and was disgusted... Nobody wants to see anyone in their pants.
 
The Sun in publishing these pictures did it for all the wrong reasons. For publicity and to have a laugh at Saddam's expense. Tastelessly too, I might add.

They weren't concerned whether it would spark more violence or hate in the region, they're just interested in promoting their trashy stories next to their topless women.
 
CptStern said:
well I can see how they might get offended ...this sort of stuff spurs terrorist groups who rely on propaganda to fuel their fighters
Christ. :rolleyes: If THAT inspires them to do whatever shitty deeds they want to do then I'm fairly certain that something in their life would do the same anyway.
 
iyfyoufhl said:
by the way, read Suddam's background, and you'll find out why he did things that he did

ohhhhh, you mean there's a good reason for genocide. Oh well I didn't know that, its all ok then isn't it, to kill thousands, providing you have a reason.. Don't tell me, God made him do it? :rolleyes:

you political discussion people are so funny, you really are
 
The Dark Elf said:
ohhhhh, you mean there's a good reason for genocide. Oh well I didn't know that, its all ok then isn't it, to kill thousands, providing you have a reason.. Don't tell me, God made him do it? :rolleyes:

you political discussion people are so funny, you really are

i think its more of a lack of political thinking which makes it funny :rolling:
 
I'm not exactly disgusted here (except by the implication of nekid saddam :x) because I mean, it's saddam. Screw 'im. Is he going to argue that this hurts his public image?

But on the other hand, way to go with the journalistic integrity, newspaper. Durrr underpants funny. They deserve to get sued just for being stupid. Let alone for releasing unauthorized photos.

In conclusion: Saddam's an evil ****, but that doesn't stop the sun from being extremely retarded.
 
Mechagodzilla said:
But on the other hand, way to go with the journalistic integrity, newspaper. Durrr underpants funny. They deserve to get sued just for being stupid.

journalistic integrity? That went out with the BBC Micro :D


---

Anyway what gets me is, everyone that is going ape over this dictator being shown in the skiddies.. but where was the uproar about Abi Titmuss giving John Leslie a blowjob while some black chick had her way with her? Or Jordan's many slipups, or those candid shots of celebs with their boobies out.

Funny how the same people who whine about this, didn't say anything against the others.. *shrugs*
 
No-one whines about celebrity boob-slips? Ever heard of Janet Jackson? :p
---
People should be complaining about this stupidity though. The media is turning into a big parade of idiocy, with an occasional pause for the weather.

If I gave a damn about the american idol, I'd watch the show. If I cared about who brad pitt was dating, I'd stalk his home. This anti-news does not belong alongside (or more specifically, replacing) things like mideast peace and maybe discovering the latest political scandal before it happens, instead of a year or ten after the fact.

It's all just a big excuse for/cash-in on lazy people to become stalkers without the effort. The entertainment media (and the media at large) are all accessories to the most widespread and retarded crime in history. Armchair Stalking.
 
Dag said:
Thats not why most people get offended. Most people get offended because it's considered "Inhumane" or "Cruel" to the former dictator, which is funny, because despite the fact that he murdered thousands, people think he should be forgiven. But the propoganda is a double-edged sword. It also shows that the once powerful leader of Iraq has been reduced to that, and so will further terrorists if the keep up thier actions.


so then by the logic the people who armed, helped, and gave vital information to saddam should also bear some responsibility? if we look at figures of those killed by the dictator and those who would "save" his citizens we'd come to the realization that not all is black and white when it comes to murdering innocents n'est pas?
 
Mechagodzilla said:
But on the other hand, way to go with the journalistic integrity, newspaper. Durrr underpants funny. They deserve to get sued just for being stupid. Let alone for releasing unauthorized photos.

In conclusion: Saddam's an evil ****, but that doesn't stop the sun from being extremely retarded.
Journalistic integrity? The Sun? Hahahhaaha.

I guess you're from Canada so you don't know what our tabloids are like. If you had that paper infront of you then turned from the first page, you'd be staring straight at a topless woman. (http://www.thesun.co.uk, see "PAGE 3" at the top)

Anyway, I think it's all pretty funny.
 
StardogChampion said:
Journalistic integrity? The Sun? Hahahhaaha.

I guess you're from Canada so you don't know what our tabloids are like. If you had that paper infront of you then turned from the first page, you'd be staring straight at a topless woman. (http://www.thesun.co.uk, see "PAGE 3" at the top)

Anyway, I think it's all pretty funny.

Have you seen today's front page?
 

Attachments

  • Sunfp.jpg
    Sunfp.jpg
    31.3 KB · Views: 263
One of the things I remember most about the Sun is that in 2001, when US (and other countries) forces started bombing Afghanistan, BBC News was showing the front pages for the next day. Every newspaper had "Bombing of Afghanistan begins" on its front page. Except for the Sun, which had "Phil about to leave Eastenders" on its front page.

EDIT:
Killing2Live said:
what are kecks?

Well, surely you can infer that from the pictures? He's not really wearing anything else other than his pants.

Note, in the UK, Pants = Underwear.
 
I hope he drives the Sun into bankruptcy. My god, that "newspaper" deserves to be burned and its publishers hanged.
 
Back
Top