Selective Logging Not Saving Rainforests

Angry Lawyer said:
He wasn't arguing that. But we don't need them to live. Bad stuff will happen if they go, but we'll still exist.

-Angry Lawyer




we do have alota trees but If the rainforest dies that doesnt mean all trees are gone...I think :bonce:
 
I hope kmack was banned permanently?

On-Topic :
Spicy Tuna said:
we do have alota trees but If the rainforest dies that doesnt mean all trees are gone...I think :bonce:
How much % of the trees in the world is in the rainforest, anyway?
I think that it'll give quite an impact, but we won't die immediatly.
 
:O Selective Logging Doesn't Save Rainforests!?!?
That's Like Saying Selective Spamming doesn't help forums.
 
Aw, I don't get to blow up at Kmack because he's already banned. :(

Is there even an issue here? Destroying the environment = bad. Stop it!
 
I think Kmack actually managed to circumvent a previous permanent ban by signing up with a new account. Previously banned for the same kind of behaviour I should imagine.
 
Because he was an arse who never did anything apart from attack those with different opinions to himself in a really insulting, annoying way, with badly written posts to boot? And he's been banned before and made a new account?
 
He worshished the Collselation "Majorus arsus holus"
 
I think he ended up annoying the people with similar political views to him also. It doesn't help your cause when you have someone with verbal disfunction arguing your case.
 
kirovman said:
I think he ended up annoying the people with similar political views to him also. It doesn't help your cause when you have someone with verbal disfunction arguing your case.
Some people at protest warrior ...

I like the site due to non censorship there of anything, but I wish sometimes there were just to make idiots (on both sides) stop babbling.
 
the 'problem' with the human race is our ability to use our intelligence to adapt. even if some disaster wipes most of us out, there will be some survivors.
 
Back
Top