Sheikh Al Hilali owned

[repiV]

Ok then. I have to sleep now. But I promise tomorrow I will be knee deep in the shit that go's for that cyclist saddle sniffers posts to get you some examples.

I've had multiple infractions for much lesser crimes than wishing people dead and spewing hate-filled vitrolic on a level I've never before seen on this forum at people for no valid reason whatsoever.
Can we get some impartial moderation over here?

You must be a real cowardly, socially maladjusted, pathetic piece of shit Gray Fox, if you can feel so strongly about somebody you've completely and utterly misunderstood, for reasons that are utterly invalid, that you would wish them killed in a road traffic accident. Not to mention you must have a double-digit IQ to draw such a conclusion in the first place.
I'm sure even Solaris would back me up on this one. Solaris, have I ever espoused "textbook communism"?

 

[Manc]

@ cpt stern..and otimic piggy or whatever your called il berate you both tommorow..ive been busy away from the computer..its this dammed social life of mine..

chow peeps..till tommoz (means tommorow) i am only translating real people speak as i know you both dont understand slang as you both are sooooooo different..

 

[The Brick]

POLITICS AAAAAAAAAGHHHH!!! DIE DIE DIE!!!





ami doin it rite?

 

[repiV]

POLITICS AAAAAAAAAGHHHH!!! DIE DIE DIE!!!





ami doin it rite?

Well until recently you had to declare your unquestioning support for either communism or capitalism, say great things about your Muslim friends as proof that all Muslims are great or bad things about that Muslim you met in the street as proof that all Muslims are evil, write something very wordy about abortion and the point of conception to make it look like you know what you're actually talking about, dissect the bible line for line or declare your unquestioning faith in God, and also you have to question your opponent's sexuality.
The test just got made harder now though - you have to talk about people here as if they're so low they aren't even human, and then wish them dead.

Then you're doing it right.

 

[Asknoone]

repIV, less the **** off dipshit if you don't mind.

 

[repiV]

repIV, less the **** off dipshit if you don't mind.

Sorry, did you not see him wish me dead and talk about me as if I'm not even human, without any provocation whatsoever, and also with absolutely no weight to his assertions?
The only comment you make to this is on my reaction?

I really wasn't imagining things when I thought the moderation here was biased. If Gray Fox's words had come from my mouth, I'd probably be banned. Apparently they aren't even worthy of comment in this case.

I'm quite speechless.

 

[The Brick]

I was doing it right! I do exactly like you guys!

 

[Manc]

Why isn't Manc banned yet? He only trolls. There is a difference between a different and/or unpopular opinion and shear and utter lunacy, and lack of even the tiniest bit of integrity and common sense.
Maybe he's doing it on purpose, maybe he's just an idiot, it doesn't matter he is disease on this community.

actually young skywalker iwas the 2nd person to post on this thread..so what on earth are you talking about. like i say to the other people who dont actually read what they are replying to...read the thread...read what the other guy is replying to..lest you look like an idiot.but a person of such high IQ as yours could never be mistaken as a muppet. (slang term for idiot) translated so automic piggy and the other guy can understand..

i await my post being broken up and quoted in small pices with lame sarcasim as a form of humour..oh wait too late.

 

[CptStern]

I was doing it right! I do exactly like you guys!

I can assure you were doing it right ..it even came across as tongue in cheek which is the way I like it (errr, ya)


..repiv no offense but even when you try to be sarcastic and funny you came across a bit asshole-ish ..it's grating rather than entertaining ..but dont mind me, I'm sure you think the same way I do (about me that is)


grayfox that peta, nazi muslim thing was lol funny

@ cpt stern..and otimic piggy or whatever your called il berate you both tommorow

lol that's like saying you'll pummel my fist with your face ..go right ahead

@ ..ive been busy away from the computer..its this dammed social life of mine..

;( sniff and here I am all alone in my big house isolated from the real world ..oh I wish I had real people to talk to ...I know! I'll invent friends, seems to work with Manc

@ chow peeps

chow is slang for food, also a breed of dog, ciao is goodbye in italian ..I thought you were europeeing? you should know that

@ ..till tommoz (means tommorow) i am only translating real people speak as i know you both dont understand slang as you both are sooooooo different..

yes we're soooo different we can only understand slang when it's spelt the way it's said ..boy you sure are s-m-r-t ..I mean s-m-a-r-t


but please do continue to post, you're a virtual well of entertainmnet ..at your expense but you're too clueless to have figured it out so more funs for me :E

 

[Gunner]

Wow @ this thread.

 

[staticprimer]

Literally the teachings are on the right. But if you're a little looser on the definitions, and simply see fascism as getting your way trough force. Then it's on both, more on the left though, since the left values the community above the needs of the individual so it more often comes down to the end justify the means then in a right wing society.

And no I'm not a fascist, you should spend a little more time in the politics section and read some of repiIV posts, then you will know here I am coming from.

'Getting your way through force' is Authoritarianism. You can have an authoritarian communist and an authoritarian fascist, but not a fascist communist. A far left person is not going to be a fascist, no matter how loose of a definition you use. To do so deludes the true meaning of the word and takes away from the significance. I don't mean to call you out personally, I just see this confusion so often, not only here but elsewhere including media such as syndicated columns, and it's one of my greatest pet peeves (no exaggeration).

 

[15357]

There are a number of people on this forum whose opinions are sheer and utter lunacy, they're not banned.
At least his very rudimentary grasp of the situation in the UK is vaguely along the right lines. He has the common sense to realise that actually, we DO have a problem, whereas others will elaborately spin the problem we have into some kind of good and noble venture that's great and wonderful.
It's a lot more than I can say for some of the more "educated" people here, who with their considerable intelligence have managed to construct some batshit insane misunderstanding of reality, intricately building on each layer of misconception and falsehood to end up with a conclusion quite intellectual that actually makes no sense at all, on any level.
There can be such a thing as too much intelligence when grossly misapplied.

Yeah. Exactly. qft.



Anyway, this thread is filled with HATE. HATEHATEHATE. HAAAATE.


A simple truth of the universe: 15357 is right. You're wrong. Dissident be damned. Communism is evil. Authoritarianism is acceptable in the defence of freedom.

Ok?


Anyway, there are crazy insane people on these boards, but who cares. Let's just not make insults at each other. I wuv you all <3.

 

[MultiVaC]

chow peeps..till tommoz (means tommorow) i am only translating real people speak as i know you both dont understand slang as you both are sooooooo different..

I'm guessing "real people speak" is your slang for "typing like a fourth grader", right?

 

[Atomic_Piggy]

I'm guessing "real people speak" is your slang for "typing like a fourth grader", right?

Yeah for him. God, why isn't he banned yet?

Oh, and RepiV is right. I have no problems with immigrants as long as its controlled as in there arn't so many they practically run the country (as it seems now).

 

[repiV]

..repiv no offense but even when you try to be sarcastic and funny you came across a bit asshole-ish ..it's grating rather than entertaining ..but dont mind me, I'm sure you think the same way I do (about me that is)

That's alright, we all have our opinions. I'm probably a little less cordial on messageboards than I am elsewhere to be honest anyway.
Not really, I find you very funny. I just think you're wrong a lot of the time and have an unhealthy obsession with America.

grayfox that peta, nazi muslim thing was lol funny

Yeah, it would have been, but he actually wasn't joking. That just really pissed me off, because it came out of nowhere, was really vicious, and made no sense. You know as well as I do that I'm not a "borderline criminal fascist lunatic" and that I don't advocate any kind of communism whatsoever.
What also pisses me off is the incompetent moderation. This proves my point about giving people infractions for "offensive messages" is complete and utter bullshit, because it's such a subjective term. Samon gave me infractions for making arguably entirely accurate comments about Islam, which offended precisely nobody except possibly Samon.
Here is something I actually find more offensive than anything else I have ever read on this forum, and what happens? I get warned on my reaction. So do the mods tell us what's offensive and what isn't now?
Samon, you're a decent guy, but you need to admit you ****ed up on this one or you're making this into a personal issue by knowingly discriminating against me. I got some kind of lecture on how we should never get into personal insults here and that it would be dealt with evenly unless you didn't see it happen, but that's clearly total bollocks.

 

[repiV]

Yeah for him. God, why isn't he banned yet?

Oh, and RepiV is right. I have no problems with immigrants as long as its controlled as in there arn't so many they practically run the country (as it seems now).

Fascist!
It's true, selective immigration is good but uncontrolled immigration is disastrous.

 

[Asknoone]

Sorry, did you not see him wish me dead and talk about me as if I'm not even human, without any provocation whatsoever, and also with absolutely no weight to his assertions?
The only comment you make to this is on my reaction?

I really wasn't imagining things when I thought the moderation here was biased. If Gray Fox's words had come from my mouth, I'd probably be banned. Apparently they aren't even worthy of comment in this case.

I'm quite speechless.

Or, you know, I just didn't read the thread and see the post. Which is the case. Having said that, sure, there's possibly some leniancy due for the dipshit comment.

 

[Atomic_Piggy]

@ grey foxes post.

 

[Pi Mu Rho]

Sorry, did you not see him wish me dead and talk about me as if I'm not even human, without any provocation whatsoever, and also with absolutely no weight to his assertions?
The only comment you make to this is on my reaction?

I really wasn't imagining things when I thought the moderation here was biased. If Gray Fox's words had come from my mouth, I'd probably be banned. Apparently they aren't even worthy of comment in this case.

I'm quite speechless.

The moderation isn't biased, get over yourself. Grey Fox has had an infraction for his post. You just weren't able to see it. Would you prefer that we come riding in on white chargers, smiting the unworthy left and right?

Oh, and for those of you wanting Manc banned - we don't ban people for being educationally subnormal. Otherwise, we'd have 90% less people on these forums.

 

[Jintor]

Chaser's War on Anything ignites horrific, moronic debate.

I lol.

 

[Atomic_Piggy]

Oh, and for those of you wanting Manc banned - we don't ban people for being educationally subnormal.

He's not that bad. He just has a different opinion. I'm sure people don't apreeciate bieng called retards.

 

[Nemesis6]

I just wanted to make fun of Hilaly and this is what I got!
Oh, that old Sheikh rape, he's a bundle of laughs... A bunch of very sick, strange, not-at-all-funny laughs, but laughs nonetheless.

 

[Gunner]

Oh, and for those of you wanting Manc banned - we don't ban people for being educationally subnormal. Otherwise, we'd have 90% less people on these forums.

That's nice, calling the forum goers retards, way to go :thumbs:

 

[repiV]

Or, you know, I just didn't read the thread and see the post. Which is the case. Having said that, sure, there's possibly some leniancy due for the dipshit comment.

Ah, cool. No probs dude.

 

[repiV]

The moderation isn't biased, get over yourself. Grey Fox has had an infraction for his post. You just weren't able to see it. Would you prefer that we come riding in on white chargers, smiting the unworthy left and right?

Well you'll forgive me for thinking otherwise when comments were made in public aimed at me but not Gray Fox.
I'd rather the content of people's posts was entirely unmoderated, but in the absence of that I'll settle for fair and balanced.

 

[Manc]

chasers is meant to be funny..its funny.you people take things very seriously.. im not that educationaly challenged..im trying not to mis-spell on purpose, i suppose when ive had a smoke tommorow..i might just for fun but hey..its a forum, not an exam..

so chill ppl (means people for those of you who have nobody to text messege..)

 

[jverne]

*faps while reading this thread*

ok seriously, don't mean to insult anyone but Manc is really being a dumbass. As for repiV. He seems intelligent but quite arrogant at times, self centered, and thinks he knows most things. He hardly admits when being wrong. Spinning is not rare for him.

 

[repiV]

*faps while reading this thread*

ok seriously, don't mean to insult anyone but Manc is really being a dumbass. As for repiV. He seems intelligent but quite arrogant at times, self centered, and thinks he knows most things. He hardly admits when being wrong. Spinning is not rare for him.

If I'm wrong, then I'll admit I'm wrong.
Assuming you're referring to the speeding thread, it will take a lot more than baseless opinions based on "common sense" which completely contradict cold, hard fact to convince me of the error of my ways. I haven't admitted I'm wrong because I'm actually right. Telling me repeatedly that I'm wrong and giving opinions as to why isn't the same thing as proving me wrong.

 

[Atomic_Piggy]

ok seriously, don't mean to insult anyone but Manc is really being a dumbass.

Okay, some of the stuff he posts if silly and offensive, but we all have posts like that.

 

[CptStern]

That's alright, we all have our opinions. I'm probably a little less cordial on messageboards than I am elsewhere to be honest anyway.

yes but you dont post in a vacuum, you have to at least take some consideration for the community you're a part of ..i'm sure you're a nice guy in RL however online all we ever see is one side of you: angry/quasi bigoted/arrogant etc ..now I'm not one to throw the first stone (/me breaks window with rock, oops) especially since I alternate between smarmy and assholish but at least I break it up with being a nice guy or a funny guy or homersexual guy ..etc

Not really, I find you very funny. I just think you're wrong a lot of the time and have an unhealthy obsession with America.

well they are making it tough to hold my neighbour's hand and sing Kumbaya in celebration of world peace and an end to imperialism yadda yadda ..thanks for the compliment ..sometimes I get really sick of arguing and I just feel like having fun with people like Manc

Yeah, it would have been, but he actually wasn't joking. That just really pissed me off, because it came out of nowhere, was really vicious, and made no sense. You know as well as I do that I'm not a "borderline criminal fascist lunatic" and that I don't advocate any kind of communism whatsoever.

ok not the borderline part .. ..ok not the borderline criminal part ...ok I'll shut up now

I'm sorry you took it that way and maybe I'm not getting the full picture here but I thought he was being less than serious ..at least in that particular comment

What also pisses me off is the incompetent moderation.

come on, Pi stated he recieved an infraction for his comments ..I myself have been reprimanded over comments I've made ..one was for a comment so slight that I had to double check to see if I was overreacting or not ..I wasnt ..however the point is that it's not what we say it's how the person on the recieving end feels about what we say ..so in this case I think Gray fox was reprimanded based on your reaction ..but you were both being equally antagonistic ..had you had no reaction there would be no reprimand ..at least that's as much as I can piece together without more info

This proves my point about giving people infractions for "offensive messages" is complete and utter bullshit, because it's such a subjective term. Samon gave me infractions for making arguably entirely accurate comments about Islam, which offended precisely nobody except possibly Samon.

well that's a little different, knowing you I'm sure it wasnt a flattering assessment or even one made in jest ..perhaps even bordering on bigotry ..but I wasnt there, I dont know what was said I can just speculate ..which is what we're doing here cuz we dont know the motivations of the moderators ..oh and to expect them to be the same across the board is a little unrealistic ..it's not like Munro pays them to be impartial

Here is something I actually find more offensive than anything else I have ever read on this forum, and what happens?

sheesh, I've gotten far worse than that ..far far worse ..many many times over

I get warned on my reaction. So do the mods tell us what's offensive and what isn't now?
Samon, you're a decent guy, but you need to admit you ****ed up on this one or you're making this into a personal issue by knowingly discriminating against me. I got some kind of lecture on how we should never get into personal insults here and that it would be dealt with evenly unless you didn't see it happen, but that's clearly total bollocks.

I've recieved many a warning even when I've done absolutely nothing simply by just participating in an argument ..it's really not our call to question as HL2 isnt a public space and not bound by free speech or any other inherent rights ..is it fair? not really but the attitude in most forums is usually along the lines of "go somewhere else" ...hey at least we're not like other forums that prohibit any sort of talk on politics or dole out insta-bans for even remotely flaming/saying something the mods disagree with ..now again I dont know the circumstances but somethings you cant make too big a deal about certain things ..if I freaked out every time someone got angry and insulted me over my comments ..well I'd have an ulcer by now (me chugs bottle of antacid pills) ...mmm this one tastes like grape ..chalk

 

[repiV]

yes but you dont post in a vacuum, you have to at least take some consideration for the community you're a part of ..i'm sure you're a nice guy in RL however online all we ever see is one side of you: angry/quasi bigoted/arrogant etc ..now I'm not one to throw the first stone (/me breaks window with rock, oops) especially since I alternate between smarmy and assholish but at least I break it up with being a nice guy or a funny guy or homersexual guy ..etc

I don't think that's entirely fair...I'm not like that outside of the usual political discussions - in the current speeding discussion which kind of broke away from your air car thread for example, or in most other discussions or whatever.
I don't think I'm remotely bigoted either. I always judge people on the basis of who they are, it doesn't stop me from making valid observations of things that generally hold true for a particular culture.
Some other people here who hold similar views to me, they're bigoted. Hence why I tend to stay out of it whenever they open their mouths. Not me though.

well they are making it tough to hold my neighbour's hand and sing Kumbaya in celebration of world peace and an end to imperialism yadda yadda ..thanks for the compliment ..sometimes I get really sick of arguing and I just feel like having fun with people like Manc

Of course they are. Bush is without doubt the worst president in American history and has done irrepairable damage both to his country and to the world. But some perspective is in order here - he's no Osama Bin Laden or Zarqawi. Placing all the blame with America is just wrong.

ok not the borderline part .. ..ok not the borderline criminal part ...ok I'll shut up now

I'm sorry you took it that way and maybe I'm not getting the full picture here but I thought he was being less than serious ..at least in that particular comment

So did I...but his followup comments indicated otherwise. It just really pissed me off at the time. What he said was really personal, when I go off at someone I might be rude but I don't make it personal and cutting.
I call em as I sees em, I actually quite like Solaris for example and I'll happily have pleasant discussions with him on MSN but if he says something stupid and inane in the politics section he's gonna hear about it. I have no doubt he has a very bright future indeed ahead of him, but he needs to get over this communism shit. Way I see it, I'm doing him a favour. He reminds me of me when I was younger.
I don't expect to be treated any differently when I do something similar.

come on, Pi stated he recieved an infraction for his comments ..I myself have been reprimanded over comments I've made ..one was for a comment so slight that I had to double check to see if I was overreacting or not ..I wasnt ..however the point is that it's not what we say it's how the person on the recieving end feels about what we say ..so in this case I think Gray fox was reprimanded based on your reaction ..but you were both being equally antagonistic ..had you had no reaction there would be no reprimand ..at least that's as much as I can piece together without more info

well that's a little different, knowing you I'm sure it wasnt a flattering assessment or even one made in jest ..perhaps even bordering on bigotry ..but I wasnt there, I dont know what was said I can just speculate ..which is what we're doing here cuz we dont know the motivations of the moderators ..oh and to expect them to be the same across the board is a little unrealistic ..it's not like Munro pays them to be impartial

sheesh, I've gotten far worse than that ..far far worse ..many many times over

I've recieved many a warning even when I've done absolutely nothing simply by just participating in an argument ..it's really not our call to question as HL2 isnt a public space and not bound by free speech or any other inherent rights ..is it fair? not really but the attitude in most forums is usually along the lines of "go somewhere else" ...hey at least we're not like other forums that prohibit any sort of talk on politics or dole out insta-bans for even remotely flaming/saying something the mods disagree with ..now again I dont know the circumstances but somethings you cant make too big a deal about certain things ..if I freaked out every time someone got angry and insulted me over my comments ..well I'd have an ulcer by now (me chugs bottle of antacid pills) ...mmm this one tastes like grape ..chalk

Good points. Can't argue with that really.

 

[jverne]

If I'm wrong, then I'll admit I'm wrong.
Assuming you're referring to the speeding thread, it will take a lot more than baseless opinions based on "common sense" which completely contradict cold, hard fact to convince me of the error of my ways. I haven't admitted I'm wrong because I'm actually right. Telling me repeatedly that I'm wrong and giving opinions as to why isn't the same thing as proving me wrong.

actually i wasn't referring to that thread. more in general.
cold hard evidence, yeah. who did that research, what factors were being accounted for. jesus, you gave me a sketchy graph from 1990.

thing is i wasn't directly contradicting you. in my country most people die because of speeding. i repeat "DIE" not just have an accident. you can call a bump an accident, but that's just stupid.

what part don't you understand...in speed limits are inherently not wrong...people make them wrong. that is also the case with your demand for every driver to be good. if that was the case then the whole world would be communist, due to it's theoretically good nature, but we all know how it's like in reality.

blame the people who place the signs not the intent of those signs.

you were not right, this is not math and even there you can't be always right. this is a matter of opinion not a mathematical problem.

 

[Sam]

I was doing it right! I do exactly like you guys!

Braver man than I, Brick.

 

[Sulkdodds]

Hoorah for manners in debate. Just because we're virulently against people's entire world-view to the point where we would happily throw eggs at them were they Prime Ministers, it doesn't mean we should throw shit at them here and now.

 

[Asknoone]

Eat shit Dodds.
/Hurls.

 

[Krynn72]

I love the politics forum. Its so much less civil than the General Off Topic boards... and thats irony. Sweet, sweet irony.

 

[Sulkdodds]

Eat shit Dodds.
/Hurls.

I am John Prescott. You are a protester.

TWINKIE HOUSE!

 

[Manc]

Jverne , im not trying to insult you in any ways or even call you anything like a moron.

 

[15357]

I am John Prescott. You are a protester.

TWINKIE HOUSE!

Yes.... give in to your fascist nature..... Join Me and we shall rule the world! Mwhahahahahahahah...HAHAHAA

 

[jverne]

Jverne , im not trying to insult you in any ways or even call you anything like a moron.

no, i didn't want to insult repiV. you can go to hell, you retard.