DarkGhost86
Newbie
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2004
- Messages
- 205
- Reaction score
- 0
my pc is 2.4GHZ, 512 MB RAM, GF4mmx 440 video card... It can run up CS: S about 20-60FPS (800*600).. What about you ?
Show your CS: S FPS!
- Thread starter DarkGhost86
- Start date
P4 3.2Ghz...1024mb PC4000...6800GT @ 401\1100
most maps its around 80-90 chateau its around 50-60
1024x768 everything on absolute high detail
2xAA 8xAF
not too shabby
EDIT: goes to show that the Athlon 64's perform better for games...evidence there
most maps its around 80-90 chateau its around 50-60
1024x768 everything on absolute high detail
2xAA 8xAF
not too shabby
EDIT: goes to show that the Athlon 64's perform better for games...evidence there
T.H.C.138
Newbie
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2004
- Messages
- 861
- Reaction score
- 0
amd athlonXP 2500+ 1.83GHz(damn locked multiplier!!!)
BFGTech 6800GT OC'd 256MB
512MB DDR PC2700
I get a somewhat steady 80-85fps with medium tetures and models
,reflect world,6xAA,4xAF,high shadows,DX9.0c(?)
resolution:1600x1200...definitely playable at those settings
and for shits and giggles I set everything as high as possible..including my resolution,at 2048x1536...
40-45fps!!!not too bad considering..but I don't think I will run it like that in a game...
these results are from mutiple VST's,BTW..
oh yeah I am currently running the 66.81 drivers for my card
BFGTech 6800GT OC'd 256MB
512MB DDR PC2700
I get a somewhat steady 80-85fps with medium tetures and models
,reflect world,6xAA,4xAF,high shadows,DX9.0c(?)
resolution:1600x1200...definitely playable at those settings
and for shits and giggles I set everything as high as possible..including my resolution,at 2048x1536...
40-45fps!!!not too bad considering..but I don't think I will run it like that in a game...
these results are from mutiple VST's,BTW..
oh yeah I am currently running the 66.81 drivers for my card
ailevation
Don't toke Sour Diesel
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2004
- Messages
- 4,907
- Reaction score
- 0
50-60 Fps, regardless the settings.CloSe2InSaNitY
Newbie
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2004
- Messages
- 85
- Reaction score
- 0
Pentium 4:
Frequency: 2.4 Ghz
Memory: 1024ddr
R9700pro: (373/310)
Resolution: 1260*1024
FPS: High,High,4xAA,---->70-77FPS
Note : everyone with a radeon 9700pro listen to this.
-R9700pro has a really good core. You should overclock it!
i did aswell.. i got alot more performance
go to : www.guru3d.com and download the ''ATiTool''
set the core to : 373 , and memory to 310.
Core performance increase = 100%*373/325 = 115% increase=15%
i haven't changed the memory yet. still tweaking for good settings.
kind regards,
Frequency: 2.4 Ghz
Memory: 1024ddr
R9700pro: (373/310)
Resolution: 1260*1024
FPS: High,High,4xAA,---->70-77FPS
Note : everyone with a radeon 9700pro listen to this.
-R9700pro has a really good core. You should overclock it!
i did aswell.. i got alot more performance
go to : www.guru3d.com and download the ''ATiTool''
set the core to : 373 , and memory to 310.
Core performance increase = 100%*373/325 = 115% increase=15%
i haven't changed the memory yet. still tweaking for good settings.
kind regards,
Sucky Ducky
Newbie
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2003
- Messages
- 60
- Reaction score
- 0
AMD XP 2600+
Geforce 6800 Standard
256 DDR (getting 512)
About 40-50 fps :-/ (In vst)
Average FPS in a busy CS: S game, 60-70 fps most areas, 30-40 fps in crowded areas.. And still only 19 fps in the market area of italy (lol)
Geforce 6800 Standard
256 DDR (getting 512)
About 40-50 fps :-/ (In vst)
Average FPS in a busy CS: S game, 60-70 fps most areas, 30-40 fps in crowded areas.. And still only 19 fps in the market area of italy (lol)
StinkyMojo
Newbie
- Joined
- May 15, 2003
- Messages
- 61
- Reaction score
- 0
T.H.C.138 said:
have you tried the fsb oc? thats what I did..
2500+ oc'd to 3200+
2x 512MB corsair XMS
GeForce 6800 128mb
i have vsync on cause i have an lcd, so my fps doesnt get more that 60. In dust i never go below 40 fps.. mostly 40-60fps on most maps when 10+ players present in screen.
edit: ill run stress test later on but i get 8,600 3d mark for 2k3, and for 2k5 i get 3,100.
X
xTHRICEx
Guest
lol, dont you love it when people dont post their in-game settings.
lol, I highly doubt you never get below 80 fps. I have a 6800 gt, a64 3200 @ 2.4 and a 1 gig pc3700, max textures and reflections, aa 4x, af 8x, and I've seen my fps go down to 10-15 fps a number of times; for example, on chateau when a nade goes off in the room full of wooden planks, or even office can get slow with lots of people, maybe you should play all the maps. However, usually I get 30-60fps in a 32 player server, more fps if their are less people playing.
Oh and I get 85 fps with my settings on the stress test.
wendle said:
lol, I highly doubt you never get below 80 fps. I have a 6800 gt, a64 3200 @ 2.4 and a 1 gig pc3700, max textures and reflections, aa 4x, af 8x, and I've seen my fps go down to 10-15 fps a number of times; for example, on chateau when a nade goes off in the room full of wooden planks, or even office can get slow with lots of people, maybe you should play all the maps. However, usually I get 30-60fps in a 32 player server, more fps if their are less people playing.
Oh and I get 85 fps with my settings on the stress test.
ShinRa
Companion Cube
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2003
- Messages
- 5,044
- Reaction score
- 84
xTHRICEx said:
well, theres your problem right there.
and specs below
max across the board with aa/af maxed too.
lowest hit: 40fps
average: 137 fps
highest: 2,017 fps
now idk if that highest fps is accurate or not, coulda been a flaw, but on net_graph 3, for one second, i was getting 2,017 fps lol.
X
xTHRICEx
Guest
http://firingsquad.com/hardware/counter-strike_source/page15.asp
"In the meantime, NVIDIA’s high-end GeForce 6800 Ultra and 6800 GT currently hold the lead over ATI in our testing, although in Italy, we had a virtual tie at max settings, as the 6800 Ultra and X800 XT PE finished within 2% of each other, while the 6800 GT and X800 XT AGP were separated by a margin of just over 1%! That’s about as close as you can get folks."
"For now we'll give this round to NVIDIA, but there's still one more Valve release that we're eagerly awaiting: Half-Life 2 itself."
nuff said...
"In the meantime, NVIDIA’s high-end GeForce 6800 Ultra and 6800 GT currently hold the lead over ATI in our testing, although in Italy, we had a virtual tie at max settings, as the 6800 Ultra and X800 XT PE finished within 2% of each other, while the 6800 GT and X800 XT AGP were separated by a margin of just over 1%! That’s about as close as you can get folks."
"For now we'll give this round to NVIDIA, but there's still one more Valve release that we're eagerly awaiting: Half-Life 2 itself."
nuff said...
Thadius Dean
Newbie
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2003
- Messages
- 884
- Reaction score
- 0
10 fps...
I
Inflatable-God
Guest
This is my setup.
P4c 2.8
Geil Dual Channel 1GB 3200
Sapphire 256mb 9600XT
120GB HDD
I use the default in catalyst 4.9, and use medium settings in CS>options>video .. and get like <50fps!! I think my computers shitted up or some bullshit.. i dont know WHY its so low.. would anyone have any idea?? Maybe its my 10gigz of porn.
Write Back!!~!!
P4c 2.8
Geil Dual Channel 1GB 3200
Sapphire 256mb 9600XT
120GB HDD
I use the default in catalyst 4.9, and use medium settings in CS>options>video .. and get like <50fps!! I think my computers shitted up or some bullshit.. i dont know WHY its so low.. would anyone have any idea?? Maybe its my 10gigz of porn.
Write Back!!~!!
Pentium 4 2.66 GHz
512 MB PC-2700 RAM
GeForce 4 Ti4200 128 MB
All settings maxed without shadows, AA, and AF.
Usually get anywhere from 20-60 FPS in CS:Source and most of the time it hovers around 50 FPS.
VST - 57.67 FPS.
EDIT: 1024x768 Resolution.
512 MB PC-2700 RAM
GeForce 4 Ti4200 128 MB
All settings maxed without shadows, AA, and AF.
Usually get anywhere from 20-60 FPS in CS:Source and most of the time it hovers around 50 FPS.
VST - 57.67 FPS.
EDIT: 1024x768 Resolution.
solideliquid
Newbie
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2004
- Messages
- 31
- Reaction score
- 0
xTHRICEx -- I agree with you!
When posting these kinds of threads its also important to list the resolution you are playing! Cause if you are getting 100fps I say wow thats great! But if you are getting 100fps at 640x480 resolution, well thats not that great in fact its pathetic!
My specs are in my sig-
1600x1200 AAx2AFx4 high settings, reflect all, vsync off. In stress test I get 80-85fps.
FRAPS:
2004-10-10 20:17:11 - hl2
Frames: 3492 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 58.200 - Min: 37 - Max: 91
2004-10-10 22:49:51 - hl2
Frames: 3742 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 62.367 - Min: 33 - Max: 85
2004-10-10 22:53:02 - hl2
Frames: 3732 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 62.200 - Min: 40 - Max: 82
So an average of 60 with the above settings. Aztec has some strange textures which slow the card down into the 20s while looking at them. So in that map I turn off AF which fixes the problem. However those numbers where recorded while playing other maps, so the settings were constant.
edit: I have a hard time believing wendle! Even at 1024x768 AAx6AFx16 hits my system pretty hard, and I do not get a min. 80fps, not even close.
When posting these kinds of threads its also important to list the resolution you are playing! Cause if you are getting 100fps I say wow thats great! But if you are getting 100fps at 640x480 resolution, well thats not that great in fact its pathetic!
My specs are in my sig-
1600x1200 AAx2AFx4 high settings, reflect all, vsync off. In stress test I get 80-85fps.
FRAPS:
2004-10-10 20:17:11 - hl2
Frames: 3492 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 58.200 - Min: 37 - Max: 91
2004-10-10 22:49:51 - hl2
Frames: 3742 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 62.367 - Min: 33 - Max: 85
2004-10-10 22:53:02 - hl2
Frames: 3732 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 62.200 - Min: 40 - Max: 82
So an average of 60 with the above settings. Aztec has some strange textures which slow the card down into the 20s while looking at them. So in that map I turn off AF which fixes the problem. However those numbers where recorded while playing other maps, so the settings were constant.
edit: I have a hard time believing wendle! Even at 1024x768 AAx6AFx16 hits my system pretty hard, and I do not get a min. 80fps, not even close.
PlasmaBurnz
Newbie
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2004
- Messages
- 68
- Reaction score
- 0
P4 2.4 @3.06
1 GB PC3500 RAM @ 255FSB (downstep multipler on 5:4 I think)
6800 GT @ 425/1200
1280 by 1024, max details, reflect all etc. vsync off, 4 aa 8 af, high quality 5.1 sound (if that effects performance I don't know). Nvidia control panel set to best quality etc.
In the VST 103fps average (after 4 runs), never drops below 50fps throughout a run.
In game most maps are around 80 to 90. Lowest 45fps.
1 GB PC3500 RAM @ 255FSB (downstep multipler on 5:4 I think)
6800 GT @ 425/1200
1280 by 1024, max details, reflect all etc. vsync off, 4 aa 8 af, high quality 5.1 sound (if that effects performance I don't know). Nvidia control panel set to best quality etc.
In the VST 103fps average (after 4 runs), never drops below 50fps throughout a run.
In game most maps are around 80 to 90. Lowest 45fps.
StinkyMojo
Newbie
- Joined
- May 15, 2003
- Messages
- 61
- Reaction score
- 0
T.H.C.138 said:
hey man when i pc'd to 3200+ i didnt even touch the multiplier.. you dont have to. your fsb should be defaulted at 166, just change it to 200 (so 200 x 11) which gets you 2.2 GHz... 3200+ speed. The 2500+ is the best Aathlon XP to oc IMO.
B
[Born][nBk]
Guest
Max Settings 9.0c settings 62.35 fps on the stress test 800*600 no AA or AASF trilliner filtering
in the game i range from 30-70 fps
AMD 2400+
(3) kingston 256 chips = 768 ddram
ATI 9600se 128 overclocked 75 over on the core clock and the memory this card kicks ass for 60 dollars
nforce 2 mobo
SB LIVE 5.1 dolby digital along with my 5.1 surround sound system CS:S SOUNDS LIKE A NUCULAR FALL OUT! HAHA
in the game i range from 30-70 fps
AMD 2400+
(3) kingston 256 chips = 768 ddram
ATI 9600se 128 overclocked 75 over on the core clock and the memory this card kicks ass for 60 dollars
nforce 2 mobo
SB LIVE 5.1 dolby digital along with my 5.1 surround sound system CS:S SOUNDS LIKE A NUCULAR FALL OUT! HAHA
Cyber$nake
Spy
- Joined
- May 21, 2003
- Messages
- 559
- Reaction score
- 0
back in the beta test(didnt buy full version yet) w/ my 2.53ghz,
512mb pc800 rdram, Geforce 4Ti4200 64mb i got 30-55 fps at 1024x768 2x AA settings on high. I was a little amazed
512mb pc800 rdram, Geforce 4Ti4200 64mb i got 30-55 fps at 1024x768 2x AA settings on high. I was a little amazed
S
-Silky Johnson-
Guest
AMD XP @ 2.4 Ghz (Originally 2500+)
1 Gig Corsair XMS (3200DDR)
Radeon 9800 Pro All-In-Wonder (128MB)
SBAudigy 2 ZS
1152 w/2XAA, 2XAF
All Setting at Max
82FPS in Stress Test
35-110FPS (Going as low as 35 is extremely rare, but ive seen it a few times, during a huge firefight with alot of people on screen)
1 Gig Corsair XMS (3200DDR)
Radeon 9800 Pro All-In-Wonder (128MB)
SBAudigy 2 ZS
1152 w/2XAA, 2XAF
All Setting at Max
82FPS in Stress Test
35-110FPS (Going as low as 35 is extremely rare, but ive seen it a few times, during a huge firefight with alot of people on screen)
Similar threads
