W4d5Y
Newbie
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2006
- Messages
- 479
- Reaction score
- 1
JESUS CHRIST, I just tried to write a topic on this a few mins ago, to no avail, since I accidently activated a key-combo that prematurely closed my window...:'(
Now, to the Solomon's building...
...being the only steel-building in the world (so far) that ever failed only due to fire?
How come the whole structure failed at once although we can't argue only a maximum of a third of it was burning at that time?
And even if it's possible for such an overdesigned building to fail after a few hours OF [exagerate]AN AMAZINGLY IMMENSE HOT BLAZE OF SCORCHING FIRE[/exagerate], as I mentioned the actually damaged part of the building should have come down earlier than the rest of the site.
Now, for the conspiracy stuff...
Some dude recently showed up who stated he was a security officer in wtc 7
(there's an video of that alleged person on the day of 9/11)
(damn, can't find it now. I just remember it was a black guy with broken glasses, speaking of getting to "the eigth floor" and then adding about an explosion which "through us back to the eigth floor", after having said he intended to go the 23rd story...now, if he was talking about 7 after all, it makes sense, because as a security guy you would seek the mayor who at the time had his emergency bunker located on the 23rd story of that building)
(oh, about 23, the collapse of 7 was reported 23 minutes to early *lol* [no, this indicates nothing. No sarcasm, nobody would tell the press about his conspiracy :3], it had 2x23 stories, excluding the ground floor and had the fateful bunker on the 23rd floor, just a lil' coincidence here.)
Ah, where's my mind at?
Yeah, the security guy... So he means, he witnessed ground level explosions on 7 before flight 175 hit...
I think he's speaking the truth, after all, if you pretended to be someone, there would be the possibility of somebody exposing your fraud by telling everybody that he was in fact the guy on the tape, and somebody tried to make up a story based on him, yet such a thing hasn't happened so far.
Anyway, even if this guy, who basically just reinforces the idea he allegedly tried to deliver on the news on 9/11, wasn't represented on that particular video, we still can assume the person in the video spoke of explosions having occured in wtc 7....
and even if he wasn't talking about 7 in particular, we can assume that there was some kind of odd off-place explosion occuring very much on the ground level in one of the three optional buildings...what seems odd enough to fuel my conspiracy theories, if you ask me!
Now, to the Solomon's building...
...being the only steel-building in the world (so far) that ever failed only due to fire?
How come the whole structure failed at once although we can't argue only a maximum of a third of it was burning at that time?
And even if it's possible for such an overdesigned building to fail after a few hours OF [exagerate]AN AMAZINGLY IMMENSE HOT BLAZE OF SCORCHING FIRE[/exagerate], as I mentioned the actually damaged part of the building should have come down earlier than the rest of the site.
Now, for the conspiracy stuff...
Some dude recently showed up who stated he was a security officer in wtc 7
(there's an video of that alleged person on the day of 9/11)
(damn, can't find it now. I just remember it was a black guy with broken glasses, speaking of getting to "the eigth floor" and then adding about an explosion which "through us back to the eigth floor", after having said he intended to go the 23rd story...now, if he was talking about 7 after all, it makes sense, because as a security guy you would seek the mayor who at the time had his emergency bunker located on the 23rd story of that building)
(oh, about 23, the collapse of 7 was reported 23 minutes to early *lol* [no, this indicates nothing. No sarcasm, nobody would tell the press about his conspiracy :3], it had 2x23 stories, excluding the ground floor and had the fateful bunker on the 23rd floor, just a lil' coincidence here.)
Ah, where's my mind at?
Yeah, the security guy... So he means, he witnessed ground level explosions on 7 before flight 175 hit...
I think he's speaking the truth, after all, if you pretended to be someone, there would be the possibility of somebody exposing your fraud by telling everybody that he was in fact the guy on the tape, and somebody tried to make up a story based on him, yet such a thing hasn't happened so far.
Anyway, even if this guy, who basically just reinforces the idea he allegedly tried to deliver on the news on 9/11, wasn't represented on that particular video, we still can assume the person in the video spoke of explosions having occured in wtc 7....
and even if he wasn't talking about 7 in particular, we can assume that there was some kind of odd off-place explosion occuring very much on the ground level in one of the three optional buildings...what seems odd enough to fuel my conspiracy theories, if you ask me!