Soldiers fresh home from Iraq brutally beaten outside club

CptStern said:
you'd have to prove intent ..this was a random thing so it would never get to attempted murder





doesnt make a lick of difference, like you said: no special treatment for distinct groups (remember the hate crime thingy you said?)
In law, in morals it's a whole other story. Someone who kills someone because they're black and someone who kills someone because they were mean to their son is still going to be perceived differently. Both are totally unacceptable and despicable.. but somehow just in human nature the first example is just more vile. In law, it's not, which I stated they should be tried for attempted murder- head stomping makes it so, regardless of intent it is seen on film. If it's seen on film a guy began shooting at people at the mall randomly with no real motive, he is still getting attempted murder. Kicker is they can get them on government property too, and some other charges legitimately.
 
RakuraiTenjin said:
In law, in morals it's a whole other story. Someone who kills someone because they're black and someone who kills someone because they were mean to their son is still going to be perceived differently. Both are totally unacceptable and despicable.. but somehow just in human nature the first example is just more vile. In law, it's not, which I stated they should be tried for attempted murder- head stomping makes it so, regardless of intent it is seen on film. If it's seen on film a guy began shooting at people at the mall randomly with no real motive, he is still getting attempted murder. Kicker is they can get them on government property too, and some other charges legitimately.


you dont see the irony here? you dont want special treatment for some but you're all for stiffer sentences because they're soldiers?


again, I'm no lawyer but I dont see them being charged with attempted murder ..again you'd have to prove intent ...oh and that guy with a gun doesnt wash ..the gun is a lethal weapon that is made to kill ...cant say the same about a man's boot
 
i second that assault shouldnt be wrong for who u do it to even on a moral level tehre should be no difference between assaulting a man on the road or the president morally.
the same applies to gender hitting women shouldnt be wrong because the person is female it should be wrong because the person is a human being.
 
CptStern said:
you dont see the irony here? you dont want special treatment for some but you're all for stiffer sentences because they're soldiers?
They aren't getting stiffer sentences if caught. They'd get attempted murder just as anyone else. I'm glad that they CAN get even more DIFFERENT charges on the grounds of harming government property, though. I wouldn't weep if this type of scum was wiped off the planet, it'd be a better place.


CptStern said:
again, I'm no lawyer but I dont see them being charged with attempted murder ..again you'd have to prove intent ...oh and that guy with a gun doesnt wash ..the gun is a lethal weapon that is made to kill ...cant say the same about a man's boot
It was not premeditated, that doesn't mean there was not intent to kill them. The fact that they knocked him out and THEN kept stomping on his head shows intent to kill him. If they wanted to beat him up/cause pain he's out cold and no longer feeling it, stomping the head is the attempt to crush his brain.
 
Well, whatever you call it, it's still violence, and it just makes me sad and angry when I see tapes like this one... :(
 
Ev!lP!e said:
Fags owned the military noobs. pwnd. har har.

Yes, you pwned yourself indeed.

Poor guys. They go to Iraq to fight a scapegoat, then they come home and get beaten to shits.
 
Back
Top