South Dakota Abortion Ban Signed Into Law

And now the South Dakotan government has control over every impregnated woman in South Dakota. So much for freedom.
 
They're certainly hampering it, but not totally destroying it.

Let's look at a few things here.

South Dakota is predominantly a state full of people of the religion Christianity. They have what, 2 abortions a year? Yeah. This isn't affecting much. Of course, it could inspire more states to do it and that's what you gotta watch out for.
 
CptStern said:
so if an unborn baby is found to have cystic fibrosis at 12 weeks and has next to no chance of surviving birth the mother has to go through the excrutiating pain of carrying the baby to term? who will be there to comfort the parents for the rest of their lives? the state? religious ****s are destroying your country america


YES BECAUSE GOD GAVE US THE BLESSING OF LIFE.

Honestly this is bad, as it gives motivation to other such "god warriors". Hopefully the Supreme Court will be all over this, while pissed.
 
Good news for the coat hanger industry.
 
DeusExMachinia said:
They're certainly hampering it, but not totally destroying it.

Let's look at a few things here.

South Dakota is predominantly a state full of people of the religion Christianity. They have what, 2 abortions a year? Yeah. This isn't affecting much. Of course, it could inspire more states to do it and that's what you gotta watch out for.
That is a completely harsh generalization to make.

I am sure that the entire state has plenty of non-Christians and plenty of Christians that would have an abortion...



OvA :p
 
Erestheux said:
That is a completely harsh generalization to make.

I am sure that the entire state has plenty of non-Christians and plenty of Christians that would have an abortion...



OvA :p

Let's look at another fact here...how many people live in South Dakota? 5

(I'm being facetious, calm down everyone :|)
 
Everyone ELSE is calm. But...

*shoves a knife in your leg*

So LISTEN UP BITCH!

:angel: :upstare:


The only reason I really wanted to point that out was so no one dismissed as not mattering. Because it does matter, quite a lot.
 
"Everythinnn is dork-saarded over thayre!"
"They're not chrisTIAAAAAAAANNS!"
"AYYHH REBUKE this in the naaaayyme of JESSSUUUUSSS ayyhh pray!"
"Ayyhh aym a gord WARRIORRR!"

LMAO. Fat freak.

Best two episodes of a "reality" show ever.
 
I saw that episode ..trading spouses right ..freakin crazy woman
 
LOL that episode was SOOOOOO funny!

See what happens when people take their religion's too seriously!

I say ban religion! Especially in the middle east.
 
I dont agree with this. They should allow exceptions in cases of rape/incest and where the mothers health is at risk. This is pretty bad...
 
*singing*
"Oh great and powerfull Ameeerrricaaaa,
the land of *cough* freedom and paranoiaaaa,
with guns and rape
in every state,
And everyone getting overweight!
From Intel to Infedel
and from sanity to christianity!

It's you right to suuuueeee
why is everyone so bluuueee?
Oh Ammeerrricaaaaaaaaaa!"

Way to remove- I mean protect your citizens rights!
 
CptStern said:
so if an unborn baby is found to have cystic fibrosis at 12 weeks and has next to no chance of surviving birth the mother has to go through the excrutiating pain of carrying the baby to term? who will be there to comfort the parents for the rest of their lives? the state? religious ****s are destroying your country america


Does the baby have a chance to live? That's a chance you have to give.


I'm tired of debating the ethics of abortiong, the above two sentences basically summarize my stance.

EDIT-

Life is such a precious thing, so easily destroyed. I can't image why anyone would forgoe the chance to bring more life into the world. People are responsible, for the most part, for where they end up in life:through the various choices and decisions they make, now whatever the intentions, I just can't condone somethign that takes away all they days that could have been lived, all the things that could have been done.
 
Life is such a precious thing, so easily destroyed. I can't image why anyone would forgoe the chance to bring more life into the world. People are responsible, for the most part, for where they end up in life:through the various choices and decisions they make, now whatever the intentions, I just can't condone somethign that takes away all they days that could have been lived, all the things that could have been done.

I'm sure the babies who enter the world in a vegitative state and/or a state of paralysis appreciate your thoughts that they should have to go through their states of various medical decay, just because some (usually religious) "right to life" (Is that a right to a "good and happy" life, or is it just the right to life itself ?) person is in power at the time.

I have to say, personally, I don't particularly like the idea of abortion being used as a leisure "morning after" pill for those who couldn't be bothered protecting themselves during the act (as for those who used - every - percieveable pre-caution ... well ... that's a different story, I've got more sympathy for them), as well as late term abortions, due to the fact that the baby is almost undoubtably a human being by that point.

The religious knee-jerk reaction of "ban all abortions" is not helping anything, barring, as mentioned before in this thread, the black-alley abortion trade.
 
BBC said:
State proposals to ban abortion are before legislatures in Mississippi, Georgia, Indiana, Missouri, Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee.

D:

6char
 
Glirk Dient said:
I dont agree with this. They should allow exceptions in cases of rape/incest and where the mothers health is at risk. This is pretty bad...
I love it how incest is such a problem in America, that it is included in things like pro-abortion reasons.:LOL:
Shasta said:
*singing*
"Oh great and powerfull Ameeerrricaaaa,
the land of *cough* freedom and paranoiaaaa,
with guns and rape
in every state,
And everyone getting overweight!
From Intel to Infedel
and from sanity to christianity!

It's you right to suuuueeee
why is everyone so bluuueee?
Oh Ammeerrricaaaaaaaaaa!"

Way to remove- I mean protect your citizens rights!
That's a song I could dance to! Where can I get the CD?!:bounce:
 
I found this in the comments section on the BBC website, I think it says a lot:

Some dude from Indiana said:
I love when people call themselves "Pro-Life". Most of those people aren't Pro-Life, they are Pro-Birth. They don't care what happens to the child after it is born so long as it is born. They are the same people who want to do away with social programs and wellfare.
 
gick said:
I found this in the comments section on the BBC website, I think it says a lot:

Ironic...The same people that are for murdering and innocent baby think its also wrong to kill a criminal for his crimes against humanity. So its ok to kill innocent babies yet when it comes to criminals all of a sudden life is precious to you liberals?

Stucco said:
I love it how incest is such a problem in America, that it is included in things like pro-abortion reasons.:LOL:

It happens...which is why it needs to be added.
 
Glirk Dient said:
So its ok to kill innocent babies yet when it comes to criminals all of a sudden life is precious to you liberals?

I support the right to abort anybody I please, at any time in their life.

-Angry Lawyer
 
Glirk Dient said:
Ironic...The same people that are for murdering and innocent baby think its also wrong to kill a criminal for his crimes against humanity. So its ok to kill innocent babies yet when it comes to criminals all of a sudden life is precious to you liberals?

:upstare: over 90% of abortions are performed in the first 16 weeks. The fetus is usually 3 inches long and weighs an once.

Crimes against humanity? you use that term incorrectly ..

"A crime against humanity is a term in international law that refers to acts of murderous persecution against a body of people, as being the criminal offence above all others."


Death.Trap said:
Does the baby have a chance to live? That's a chance you have to give.

so you're saying that a baby who will die shortly after birth should live to see that eventuality? how ****ing cruel is that? what about the parents? will YOU console them for the rest of their lives? will the state? YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO AN OPINION TILL YOU HAVE TO MAKE THE DECISION FOR YOURSELF
 
. I can't image why anyone would forgoe the chance to bring more life into the world.
So you should be penalised for not having enough unprotected sex?
 
Glirk Dient said:
Ironic...The same people that are for murdering and innocent baby think its also wrong to kill a criminal for his crimes against humanity. So its ok to kill innocent babies yet when it comes to criminals all of a sudden life is precious to you liberals?
Ahem...
 
If you're going to ban abortions, you could at least give the mothers-to-be some kind of welfare support programme.
And not one that makes them work 16 hour shifts down a mine 200 miles away from their home.
 
*Gets to work converting Kirovman's SCALAR WAVE EMITTER to a sterilising tool to aim at South Dakota*

-Angry Lawyer
 
CptStern said:
:upstare: over 90% of abortions are performed in the first 16 weeks. The fetus is usually 3 inches long and weighs an once.

It still is potentially a baby. If it is healthy and was conceived by accident then it should be put up for adoption. There are too many parents that cant have a child to let a careless person kill a baby they potentially could raise.

CptStern said:
Crimes against humanity? you use that term incorrectly ..

Yes an No...most liberals are again the death sentence at all costs. So someone like sadam who has commited crimes against humanity is free to live the rest of his days while an unborn baby that will be put into loving parents arms is killed because people were either careless or don't want to have to bear the baby until it is born.
 
Glirk Dient said:
It still is potentially a baby. If it is healthy and was conceived by accident then it should be put up for adoption. There are too many parents that cant have a child to let a careless person kill a baby they potentially could raise.

Doesn't that make wanking really immorral, for the same reasons?

-Angry Lawyer
 
Angry Lawyer said:
Doesn't that make wanking really immorral, for the same reasons?

-Angry Lawyer

No...without the egg there is no potential of life...unless your a transvesite. So we need to ban transvestites from masterbating as well!
 
Angry Lawyer said:
Doesn't that make wanking really immorral, for the same reasons?

-Angry Lawyer
Yeah, there are thousands of women just waiting to be impregnated. Angry Lawyer, I don't want you touching yourself anymore. It is a sin!
 
Glirk Dient said:
It still is potentially a baby. If it is healthy and was conceived by accident then it should be put up for adoption. There are too many parents that cant have a child to let a careless person kill a baby they potentially could raise.



Yes an No...most liberals are again the death sentence at all costs. So someone like sadam who has commited crimes against humanity is free to live the rest of his days while an unborn baby that will be put into loving parents arms is killed because people were either careless or don't want to have to bear the baby until it is born.
I think one of the worst things about you is that you're making the decision for the women. I wouldn't be surprised if you've ever mistreated a woman before.
 
Glirk Dient said:
It still is potentially a baby. If it is healthy and was conceived by accident then it should be put up for adoption. There are too many parents that cant have a child to let a careless person kill a baby they potentially could raise.



Yes an No...most liberals are again the death sentence at all costs. So someone like sadam who has commited crimes against humanity is free to live the rest of his days while an unborn baby that will be put into loving parents arms is killed because people were either careless or don't want to have to bear the baby until it is born.


what Angry Lawyer said



Angry Lawyer: is there some way I can donate to this scalar wave sterilizer? where do I send the cheque? ...oh and will you be making one that can zap bigger areas? like south of the Mason-dixon line? ;)
 
Captain M4d said:
I think one of the worst things about you is that you're making the decision for the women. I wouldn't be surprised if you've ever mistreated a woman before.

So now the choice to murder babies is up to women because it is their baby thats being murdered? Does that mean I can have my family eliminated because it is my family and therefor my choice?
 
glirk please stop ..you cant compare a lump of cells to a living breathing human being ...most abortions are performed within the first 4-6 weeks when the baby is 1/5 of an inch long ..or about the size of a grain of rice ..if you can successfully argue that that is a human being when scientists, theologians havent been able to determine that then I will make a complete about face.

again Glirk I ask you ..and I want a straight answer:

should the state have the right to force you to keep your child alive to full term even though there is 100% certainty that it will die at birth or that it is so severly handicapped that each living breathing day will be a struggle full of pain and misery? I wouldnt wish that on my worst enemy
 
CptStern said:
what Angry Lawyer said



Angry Lawyer: is there some way I can donate to this scalar wave sterilizer? where do I send the cheque? ...oh and will you be making one that can zap bigger areas? like south of the Mason-dixon line? ;)

All checks are to be made payable to Kirovman. Buy three, and get a Tesla Howitzer for half price!

And Glirk - I just wanted a legit reason to post the word "Wank".

-Angry Lawyer
 
wow I have tons of uses for a Tesla Howitzer ..wonder if it'll fit in my office
 
Back
Top