Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
OMG this is not gonna be the speedtread but the hatetread
Come on people...I get your frustration CrazyHarij, you give some critics and someone goes in to full attack just ignore him. He'll learn afterall. If he still got his ego then that's because it didn't get crushed somewhere somehow...I'll happen and then we can have some long sensible discussions about light and shadows, anatomy and how to do a decent speedpainting.
And the same goes for Glo-Boy. Critice is not a negative thging it helps you to advance. And hey to good part is you get to chooce yourslf wether you'll use it or neglect it. Just dont play the mister I know it all because Im an art-school student. Now you're boosting with your knowledge of basic color-theory and anatomy...So chill..Both of you...
Still interested in the tread....It inspired me
It can force us to do some more speedies
Altough my speedies mostly take an hour. So no real speedies...heh
Anyway, here's the one of tonight Grtzzz
thats hot I wished i could do that in my photoshop
Ok Glo-Boy, you're getting slightly idiotic from a bystander's viewpoint here.
Well it's kinda hidden in one of my previous posts, but I've only shown you a piece of the real composition. It extends to about twice that high, and twice as long, with empty ocean and sky on the left. It's resolution is 3840x2160 I think? What you're seeing fills up the lower right hand corner. So the left side is definitely going to get some mega attention tonight. Castle noted, vegeta. I was originally thinking fortress, but perhaps I'll kind of merge the two. I have dual vanishing points laid out as well. Here is what I have semi rendered back at the lab.
so far I only have the basic buildings, wall, archways, and some spikes fleshed out. I almost threw it away but decided to keep it just in case.
Another idea i had was to do something crazy and have like, some blimps coming in with giant flame throwers, or maybe like liquid nitrogen hoses to battle the dragons with. it can really be anything, different planet, time, place, two different times together?
I also thought about building a batman begins kind of ninja dorm and setting it into the side of the rock, with tons of ninjas coming outside to start kicking ass. Maybe some of them are on fire already, some are charred and smoking, maybe a dead dragon halfway out of the water.
Maybe I'll just render the wall going back into space with just more rocks here and there for stability.
Decisions, decisions.
Yes, well all this hate is making me sad. So, to liven things up a bit, here's an old sketch of mine also.
=D
Check out the hoo-has on the girl in the white shirt...perfect!....Well that's all relative, because the world appears only as our eyes perceive it. However, I can definitely tell you that our eyes pick up shadows as the opposite color of the light.
http://news.uns.purdue.edu/images/+2005/EPICS-color.jpg
I guess that part of my argument was to illustrate how learning these fundamentals by in depth teaching and application does loads more than just replicating existing images and palettes. Harij, seriously, before I went to art school, I thought I was the shit. I was exactly who I have come to roll my eyes at when dealing with art. You have some good basis knowledge, but jesus man, don't shun art school because you think you're too good for it. You would have a very humbling experience if you went - but you would improve enormously! Look into it. I mean, that's the whole reason I get so god damn pissed off when people tell me my properties are wrong. They may not please everyone, but the principles are correct. It would be like telling Rockstar that Max Payne was made incorrectly. You might think the game isn't fun, or just a pile of shit in general... but it was written and compiled properly.
A bit late in coming, since everyone has seemed to calm down, here's my personal opinion, as an aspiring artist(heh i think) and (more often) viewer of art. I hope you'll read it.
There is no such thing as right and wrong, in art.
If there was a set way to create art, it would never evolve, never push the boundries of imagination and convention. How many great artists never went to art school? How many of those who did, took what they learned and went against the grain, or made a mistake and ran with it? I often use the phrase "art by accident". Techniques are tools nothing more. It's up to you to use them in the manner you see fit, or not at all.
Now, that's not to say you can hide a poorly executed piece by calling it avant garde or 'your style', no. But, I believe that it simply doesn't matter how you achieve your goal. Outside of a classroom (and sometimes not even then), no one cares about the technical aspect of a piece of art. And, forgive me for saying so, but I believe anyone who cannot look past that aspect doesn't really get the concept of art as a whole. Though I'm not saying that anyone has done that, I'm speaking generally.
And whether or not a piece of work is 'successful', is a completely subjective affair. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. If an artist sets out to create a technically perfect painting and nothing else, and suceeds, then it is mission accomplished. But if a viewer is looking for emotion and nothing else, then by the same token, he could call that a failure.
And ultimately, one should remember that it doesn't matter if your piece is popular, so long as you are happy with it and it accomplishes its goal. We all look for different things, and we very rarely please everyone and ourselves simultaneously. Some will like a piece, others won't. Such is life, such is art.
Glo-Boy and CrazyHarij: You are both wonderful artists, capable of great work (better than I, in fact). You simply paint and draw differently. And that is what art is all about, expressing yourself and being original. Neither of you should claim to draw the 'right way' you should simply draw 'your own way'.
To draw a realistic scene, you need to know about real life, and real life has rules. The artists of the past spent their entire lives trying to learn things about life so that we don't have to. To disregard everything that can be learnt and applied would be stupid
Just because you know about the basics of colour, value, anatomy etc doesn't mean that your work will be the same as everyone elses. No 2 brains are exactly alike.
Techniques are tools nothing more. It's up to you to use them in the manner you see fit, or not at all.
Now, that's not to say you can hide a poorly executed piece by calling it avant garde or 'your style', no. But, I believe that it simply doesn't matter how you achieve your goal. Outside of a classroom (and sometimes not even then), no one cares about the technical aspect of a piece of art. And, forgive me for saying so, but I believe anyone who cannot look past that aspect doesn't really get the concept of art as a whole. Though I'm not saying that anyone has done that, I'm speaking generally.
And whether or not a piece of work is 'successful', is a completely subjective affair. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. If an artist sets out to create a technically perfect painting and nothing else, and suceeds, then it is mission accomplished. But if a viewer is looking for emotion and nothing else, then by the same token, he could call that a failure.
And ultimately, one should remember that it doesn't matter if your piece is popular, so long as you are happy with it and it accomplishes its goal. We all look for different things, and we very rarely please everyone and ourselves simultaneously. Some will like a piece, others won't. Such is life, such is art.
And for anyone else who still doubts the use of textures and such after my bad ass explanation, just have a look here. http://rozrywka.pclab.pl/zdjecia/artykuly/carnage/half-life_2/innercity.jpg