Stupid bitch calls some guy a ******

[Nemesis6]

Stupid choice of words indeed. I don't really know much about her. What I do know, however, is that the moonbats don't like her. Probably why they picture her as a Nazi. But I like the title of one of her books "How to Talk to a Liberal ___if you must" :angel:


Anyway, worse than John Kerry? I don't think so.

 

[gick]

Stupid choice of words indeed. I don't really know much about her. What I do know, however, is that the moonbats don't like her. Probably why they picture her as a Nazi. But I like the title of one of her books "How to Talk to a Liberal ___if you must" :angel:


Anyway, worse than John Kerry? I don't think so.

OK, before you open your ****ing mouth at least try to find out what the hell your talking about.

Please find me John Kerry quotes that are anywhere near as bad as this:

On 9/11 widows:

These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by grief-arazzis... These self-obsessed women seemed genuinely unaware that 9/11 was an attack on our nation and acted as if the terrorist attacks happened only to them... I?ve never seen people enjoying their husbands? deaths so much.

On arabs/middle east

We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war.

I think the government should be spying on all Arabs, engaging in torture as a televised spectator sport, dropping daisy cutters wantonly throughout the Middle East and sending liberals to Guantanamo.

Desegregation of schools:

Few failures have been more spectacular. Illiterate students knifing one another between acts of sodomy in the stairwell is just one of the many eggs that had to be broken to make the left's omelette of transferring power from states to the federal government

The environment:

The ethic of conservation is the explicit abnegation of man's dominion over the Earth. The lower species are here for our use. God said so: Go forth, be fruitful, multiply, and rape the planet ? it's yours. That's our job: drilling, mining and stripping. Sweaters are the anti-Biblical view. Big gas-guzzling cars with phones and CD players and wet bars ? that's the Biblical view.

Freedom of speech

They're [Democrats] always accusing us of repressing their speech. I say let's do it. Let's repress them. Frankly, I'm not a big fan of the First Amendment.

When we were fighting communism, OK, they had mass murderers and gulags, but they were white men and they were sane. Now we're up against absolutely insane savages

I think [women] should be armed but should not vote...women have no capacity to understand how money is earned. They have a lot of ideas on how to spend it...it's always more money on education, more money on child care, more money on day care.

It would be a much better country if women did not vote. That is simply a fact. In fact, in every presidential election since 1950 - except Goldwater in '64 - the Republican would have won, if only the men had voted.

Liberals hate America, they hate flag-wavers, they hate abortion opponents, they hate all religions except Islam, post 9/11. Even Islamic terrorists don't hate America like liberals do. They don't have the energy. If they had that much energy, they'd have indoor plumbing by now

But obviously she must be wonderful because the 'moonbats' (presumably anyone who isnt a reactionary ultra-conservative in your book) dont like her. :thumbs:

 

[CptStern]

nemesis identifies with coulter because he uses the exact same buzz words as her: moonbats, leftists, liberal, Islamists. Nemesis worships the cult of personality so long as it fits within this narrowly defined little right wing box of rhetoric/ideology. He fails at being politically relevant because everything he ingests is filtered through that same narrow pov and regurgitated ad nauseum whenever the opportunity arises despite the topic at hand, relevancy of the issue or whether the facts support his contention or not ...I'm convinced had the headline read "Bush eats newborn" he'd find some way of blaming "leftards", "leftist moonbat media" or muslims in general

 

[Absinthe]

Stupid choice of words indeed. I don't really know much about her. What I do know, however, is that the moonbats don't like her. Probably why they picture her as a Nazi. But I like the title of one of her books "How to Talk to a Liberal ___if you must" :angel:


Anyway, worse than John Kerry? I don't think so.

You really should be banned on the grounds of just being so effing stupid.

 

[Sulkdodds]

What I do know, however, is that the moonbats don't like her.

Then 'moonbats' must mean 'people with brains', because whatever your political standpoint there is very little to admire in her.

 

[Nemesis6]

Stern's speculation that I sympathize with her is just the normal bullshit - Among which you will find the typical "nemesis hates muslims", etc. And no, moonbat doesn't mean people with a brain. Absinthe... trying to control what other people should say? How very Kos'y of you. Stern - Yes. I hate Muslims and I drink their blood that I receive with my weekly Zionist cheque. Stop stereotyping your political opponents. I don't think you're a truther, so why can't you give me the benefit of the doubt I haven't expressed sympathy with her?

So, if you would actually understand my post as it was intended - I said I didn't know her, and that's what I meant. I just know that moonbats don't like her. If you're a moonbat, too bad. When you find time to make images like these, that's pretty much what you are - http://images.google.com/images?cli...ial&hl=da&q=Coulter&btnG=Søg+i+billeder&gbv=2

Anyway, about Kerry - http://img64.imageshack.us/my.php?image=iraklr5.jpg
There's probably a reason those soldiers are holding that sign... Probably this - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLuMWiQ6r2o

 

[Absinthe]

You actually compared John Kerry to this psycho. Look, I know you hate us liberal fags and everything, but please be fair.

 

[Sulkdodds]

So, if you would actually understand my post as it was intended - I said I didn't know her, and that's what I meant. I just know that moonbats don't like her. If you're a moonbat, too bad. When you find time to make images like these, that's pretty much what you are - http://images.google.com/images?clie...billeder&gbv=2

Yeah...no. None of us know her. We can only form opinions based on her public presence. And her public presence is that of a hawking, rude and absurd mad-woman unwilling to engage in any real public discourse, unable to fashion or present a coherent argument, unconcerned about a little thing called fact. She is the real-world equivalent of an internet troll. I haven't even mentioned her actual opinions.

If you are capable of any kind of rational thought then, left or right, communist or capitalist, authoritarian or liberatarian, 'conservative' or 'liberal', gay or straight, religious or atheist, deal or no deal, hot or not, I can see no reason why she might inspire any positive feelings - beyond some misguided admiration for her enfant provocateur tactics.

Kerry belittles troops. Coulter advocates genocide and stalinism.

I hope you can see the difference.

But you say: I don't know her. You say: we can't judge. You say: "I don't know about her, but I know [derogatory term for lefties] hate her!" The strong inference of your post is: "I don't know her, but she must be doing something right!"

But you know her just as well as anyone else here, and yet still you reserve judgement - this is the same damn thing Mecha's been criticising you for. I hate to make assumptions but all I can see here is someone steadfastedly refusing to criticise something because they feel it is on 'their' side - it looks very much as if the enemy of your enemy is your friend, and you'll turn a blind eye to the faults of those you percieve as sympathetic to your worldview. Why else would you start ranting about Kerry - whose crimes, if they be so, are so slight next to hers as to be almost irrelevant - in a thread about the reprehensible Coulter?

I would very much like you to prove me wrong on that count and to provide a decent explanation as to why you think she warrants even neutrality.

Oh, certainly she revels in our cries of hatred. Certainly she loves our opposition. But she can't hear us (unless she is on this forum, right now, at this very monent!, so that's of absolutely no relevance.

 

[CptStern]

Stern's speculation that I sympathize with her is just the normal bullshit

you do, why else would you focus on Kerry/edwards while avoiding ciommenting on what this thread is about? you obviously agree with her statements or you'd condemn her for them which you didnt

Among which you will find the typical "nemesis hates muslims", etc.

which you do, I dont think a person here would dispute that

And no, moonbat doesn't mean people with a brain.

no it means people without a brain (probably because they've been kicked one too many times in the head by rational people)made up an idiotic label to defer some of the accusations that they're batshit insane

Absinthe... trying to control what other people should say?

Absinthe is right, you're a troll and deserve to be bitchslapped/temp banned

How very Kos'y of you.

oh noes!!1 you mentioned Moonbat website Daily Kos!! you just cant help it can you? any ****ing opportunity to reference some idiotic partisan rhetoric you'll take ...I'm starting to think that you dont even understand what 90% of it all means. ..you just parrot everything you say/read ..you're a bigger fool than I thought

Stern - Yes. I hate Muslims and I drink their blood that I receive with my weekly Zionist cheque. Stop stereotyping your political opponents.

opponent would imply that I see you as an equal which I do not ..you're not much of a challenge to be honest

I don't think you're a truther, so why can't you give me the benefit of the doubt I haven't expressed sympathy with her?

because you have; by choosing sides based solely on whatever side of the political fence they so happen to sit on ..there is no individualism to you ..you're either rightwing or a moonbat

So, if you would actually understand my post as it was intended - I said I didn't know her, and that's what I meant. I just know that moonbats don't like her. If you're a moonbat, too bad.

you prove my point over and over again:

He fails at being politically relevant because everything he ingests is filtered through that same narrow pov and regurgitated ad nauseum whenever the opportunity arises despite the topic at hand, relevancy of the issue or whether the facts support his contention or not

oh and you've just called pretty much every single rational person on this earth a moonbat ..because only the hopelessly stupid or hopelessly stupid neo-conservatives agree with coulter ..she'd make the freakin pope what to punch her in the ****

When you find time to make images like these, that's pretty much what you are - http://images.google.com/images?cli...ial&hl=da&q=Coulter&btnG=Søg+i+billeder&gbv=2

yes because only moonbats would loathe her particular brand of fascist scapegoating and vile hate speech ..anyone even remotely questioning her MUST be a moonbat :upstare:

 

[Absinthe]

Absinthe... trying to control what other people should say? How very Kos'y of you.

Sure. I would love to lock you up in my pinko moonbat gulag. Or maybe I was just pointing out that you're an idiot. I dunno. However you wish to interpret it. You do little more than waft about an aura of prejudice. So be aware that if I advocate your banning, it's not to silence your oh-so-precious political ideals. It's because you're just an unproductive crazy man.

I like how you point out that liberal extremists hate her, as if that may validate a single word that comes out of her mouth. Anybody with an ounce of sense should detest her (and many do), both liberals and conservatives alike.

I like how right wing nuts had to actually come up with the term "moonbat" to address such a small and negligible force of liberal extremism. It's like you're just propping up enemies for the sake of it.

 

[kirovman]

Most conservatives will feel embarrassed by her comments and naturally try to distance themselves from her.

Most people can agree that she's batshit insane.

 

[Absinthe]

Most conservatives will feel embarrassed by her comments and naturally try to distance themselves from her.

The thing is, she still gets invited to these conventions. She still gets money and publicity. As much as I wish that she was just a vulgar albeit irrelevant voice, she epitomizes some of the most disgusting aspects of the United States. She is a reflection of a problem.

This is usually where some apologist comes in and says "Oh, it's only shock value! It's just humor!". Really? Is it really? Because she has been nothing if not consistent in her insistence that she's serious and that she means what she says. Humor generally requires that you occasionally remind people that it's an act. This is not the case with Ann Coulter. You may argue that the very obscenity of her opinions is an indication, but we live in a world of crazy people who do crazy shit every day. It takes no stretch of the imagination to see her as legitimately believing her filth.
And even if it all is just some big joke, it sucks. You'd think that after 9/11 people would wake up and start distancing themselves from irrational, prejudicial, mind-numbingly stupid hatred and find less humor in this tripe. She embodies her terrorist opponents far more than she'll ever admit.

 

[brink's]

Absinthe has a point, CNN did a small segment on her which included audience opinion and half of the callers completely agreed with what she said. Some even think she is breaking down barriers with this kind of nonsense.

But, i strongly believe that if she weren't opposed her political value would evaporate in a matter of months, nothing she says is relevant or is even worth considering, the only reason she is constantly in the news is because she is constantly opposed.

 

[CptStern]

She is a reflection of a problem.

agreed

 

[BabyHeadCrab]

**** Anne C.

The thing is, she still gets invited to these conventions. She still gets money and publicity. As much as I wish that she was just a vulgar albeit irrelevant voice, she epitomizes some of the most disgusting aspects of the United States. She is a reflection of a problem.

This is usually where some apologist comes in and says "Oh, it's only shock value! It's just humor!". Really? Is it really? Because she has been nothing if not consistent in her insistence that she's serious and that she means what she says. Humor generally requires that you occasionally remind people that it's an act. This is not the case with Ann Coulter. You may argue that the very obscenity of her opinions is an indication, but we live in a world of crazy people who do crazy shit every day. It takes no stretch of the imagination to see her as legitimately believing her filth.
And even if it all is just some big joke, it sucks. You'd think that after 9/11 people would wake up and start distancing themselves from irrational, prejudicial, mind-numbingly stupid hatred and find less humor in this tripe. She embodies her terrorist opponents far more than she'll ever admit.

Couldn't have asked for a more truthful post.

 

[jondy]

agreed

That's pretty horrifying

 

[Hapless]

http://www.halflife2.net/forums/showthread.php?t=121059

Since we're tslking about obscenity of opinions and all....


BTW, what the hell is a moonbat?

 

[Mechagodzilla]

It's trolling.
Nemesis will recieve reprimand if he continues in this direction.

 

[Sulkdodds]

Like a fruitbat, only it eats the moon.

 

[CptStern]

http://www.halflife2.net/forums/showthread.php?t=121059

Since we're tslking about obscenity of opinions and all....

lol obviously you havent seen this one yet

BTW, what the hell is a moonbat?

anyone not Nemesis apparently

 

[Absinthe]

Moonbat is supposed to be a derogatory term for liberal extremists. I'm not quite sure what exactly moons or bats have to do with anything, but it sounds kinda neat. I think I'm gonna add it to my repertoire of general insults.

 

[Stigmata]

Honestly, I don't find it derogatory at all. Bats have sweet echolocation and can fly, and... you know... the Moon. The Moon is ****ing badass.

Are we enormous spheroids of rock and lava, hurtling around the Earth with a pair of awesome bat-wings? Or are we bats that can echolocate without an atmosphere - through the very fabric of spacetime itself?

 

[DEATHMASTER]

With a sledgehammer.

on fire.

Seriously its threads like these that make me love this place so much. You guys still scare the **** out of me from time to time though :cheers: .

 

[Nemesis6]

Yeah...no. None of us know her. We can only form opinions based on her public presence. And her public presence is that of a hawking, rude and absurd mad-woman unwilling to engage in any real public discourse, unable to fashion or present a coherent argument, unconcerned about a little thing called fact. She is the real-world equivalent of an internet troll. I haven't even mentioned her actual opinions.

If you are capable of any kind of rational thought then, left or right, communist or capitalist, authoritarian or liberatarian, 'conservative' or 'liberal', gay or straight, religious or atheist, deal or no deal, hot or not, I can see no reason why she might inspire any positive feelings - beyond some misguided admiration for her enfant provocateur tactics.

Kerry belittles troops. Coulter advocates genocide and stalinism.

I hope you can see the difference.

But you say: I don't know her. You say: we can't judge. You say: "I don't know about her, but I know [derogatory term for lefties] hate her!" The strong inference of your post is: "I don't know her, but she must be doing something right!"

But you know her just as well as anyone else here, and yet still you reserve judgement - this is the same damn thing Mecha's been criticising you for. I hate to make assumptions but all I can see here is someone steadfastedly refusing to criticise something because they feel it is on 'their' side - it looks very much as if the enemy of your enemy is your friend, and you'll turn a blind eye to the faults of those you percieve as sympathetic to your worldview. Why else would you start ranting about Kerry - whose crimes, if they be so, are so slight next to hers as to be almost irrelevant - in a thread about the reprehensible Coulter?

I would very much like you to prove me wrong on that count and to provide a decent explanation as to why you think she warrants even neutrality.

Oh, certainly she revels in our cries of hatred. Certainly she loves our opposition. But she can't hear us (unless she is on this forum, right now, at this very monent!, so that's of absolutely no relevance.

Well, I haven't expressed any sympathy with her. And I mean what I said literally - I have never really heard that much about her. Maybe this is the reason; That she's an extremist. Also, know that I don't think liberals are moonbats. It's a term I use only for the really far-out ones. Namely the different breeds of "truthers". And the ones who started destroying everything they could about a week ago. Anarchists. You know, the IndyMedia-type of people. That kind of far left. I guess I could have elaborated a bit more on my points.

Anyway, I don't condemn her because that's what you want me to, and you're not really being all that nice about it, so it's kind of a principal thing more than anything else. But my point about Kerry was not to compare them, but rather to point out something a bit hypocritical - If Kerry, a presidential candidate, said something like it, most people wouldn't post about it. But when someone who's obviously a provocateur says something derogatory, most people here would probably pounce on it like Michael Jackson on a child. Don't know where he comes in, but still.

 

[Sulkdodds]

I understand what you mean by 'moonbats', but your point is crazy.

What exactly do you think would happen if Kerry said "something like it" - something really comparable? Like 'we should put conservatives in prison camps." Do you really think nobody would comment? People would go batshit and condemn him as would I. You claim your point about John Kerry was "not to compare them", but that is exactly what you did:

Anyway, worse than John Kerry? I don't think so.

The idea that you're refusing to comment on her because 'we want you to' (I personally just want you to adequately explain your views) - the idea that your standpoint is in reaction to ours - is spurious. Before anybody mentioned you you were in this thread:

- making an entirely ridiculous comparison with John Kerry that holds no water. Why?
- making a silly reference to 'moonbats' - as if they're the only ones that find her deplorable. Why?
- Refering to the (stupid) title of one of her books - stupid because it not only places people into narrow categories (indeed, onto one side or the other of a false divide - liberals and conservatives) but forces that category to become the defining element of a person; the entire title is essentially an ad-hominem attack that well lends itself to statements like "liberals hate america". In praising it you align yourself with this kind of rubbish. Why?

If you really know nothing about her, why even post in the thread before doing a little research? Instead, you choose to make a point of your lack of an opinion.

I hate to skate so dangerously close to the kind of fisher price e-psychology I so hate, but your post displays only one purpose: to diminish Coulter's ideological stink to an absurd degree and thus proclaim your tacit support, to scathe 'liberals' for the ease with which they, by criticising her, slip into stereotypes and pack themselves in boxes marked 'whacko'; to, simply put, piss people off.

Basically, to say: "Ho ho ho, that Coulter is such a wag. She's annoying all you lefties and I love it."

I apologise, but that's why I'm not being "nice" - because as far as anyone can see you're essentially trolling.