Surveillance without warrant

K

kathaksung

Under Surveillance
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Messages
522
Reaction score
0
501. Surveillance without warrant (8/8/07)

The honorable Senator
US Senate
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senator

I'm writing you to oppose the newly passed law (Passed in Senate on Aug. 3, signed by Bush on Aug. 5) which gives government expanded surveillance authority without court approval.

I urge you to re-consider the law because of the following reason:

1. The proposed bill is a violation of the Constitution and an affront to our civil rights as US citizens. It especially damaged the Fourth Amendment which protecting people from unreasonable search and arrest.

It's easy for coruptive police to manipulate a "terrorist suspect" to e-mail, or dialogue in an internet forum, to frame innocent people. (In Miame terror cell case of 2006, a FBI informant had instructed the cell member to attack FBI office ).

2. There is no reason to say old FISA rule doesn't work. Under which the government can do eavesdropping any time when it requires. Even if it's in emergence, they can wiretap first and submit an application to court later. Nothing hinder their surveillance work.

A surveillance without warrant means a blank check to the secret police. It opens the door to a fascist country.

3. Surveillance not only means eavesdropping, it also means harassment. FBI, DEA are notorious for abusing power. They harass, plant and frame case. There is lack of a surveillance on these so said "law enforcement". The new law gives them further more room for abusing power. It is an attack on the principle of Check and Balance.

4. A negative side of this law from my personal experience. I posted a lot in internet web forum. I used to reveal the dark side of the government, especially about the law enforcement. I suffered continuous harassment from the Feds cyberspace team. Recently I was blocked from three web sites. (two of them are media's web site)

(1) On Aug. 1, blocked to enter "http://p067.ezboard.com/fdenverpostnewsfrm9 " by technical problem.
(2) On Aug. 4, banned to enter "http://forum.signonsandiego.com/upload/index.php?"
(3) On Aug. 5, banned to enter "http://forums.shoutwire.com/forumdisplay.php?s=&daysprune=&f=7"

Since my posting were all of political opinion, there was no reason to ban me accessing the site. The ban is so thorough that I couldn't complain nor read. I allege it was from surveillance team not from the web site. I think it was done when Feds (FBI, DEA) has been inspired and encouraged by the would passing new surveillance law.

In conclusion, I urge you to re-consider the new intelligence surveillance law, at least do some amendment to limit the unrestricted power of law enforcement. I also urge you to investigate the abusing in internet communication caused by the Feds (FBI, DEA). (see below)

Sincerely

Kat Hak Sung

--------------


http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2165/t/1027/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=12293
 
I'm lucky to have seen your post before the spies edit it with their disinformation.
 
...But the carriers aren't.


*shoots V in head*
 
But you can't kill V. For you see, V is everybody. :O
 
Wait...so you spouted off nonsensical crap that no one can read...then return to the site and can't access it? HOLY CRAP ITS THE FEDS!
 
Meh. Has very little to do with surveillance, more to do with being... A TERRORIST!!!!
 
LOL HE ACTUALLY THINKS HE WAS BANNED BY FEDS


HE ACTUALLY THINKS THIS!!!!


lol
 
(1) On Aug. 1, blocked to enter "http://p067.ezboard.com/fdenverpostnewsfrm9 " by technical problem.
(2) On Aug. 4, banned to enter "http://forum.signonsandiego.com/upload/index.php?"
(3) On Aug. 5, banned to enter "http://forums.shoutwire.com/forumdisplay.php?s=&daysprune=&f=7"
Click to expand...

LOL! Kathaksung seems to be owned wherever he posts this drivel! :cheese:
 
Mr Sung, I applaud your intentions, noble as I am sure they are, but the examples of internet forums banning you is a load of horseshit. These are privately-owned websites, and as such they maintain the right to treat their users in any way they please. They don't need a reason or a justification to ban you because you are using their website voluntarily; whether you think it wrong or not it's the law.

There is no evidence nor reason to think that 'feds' and not over-zealous forum admins ban you. They can and will ban you for any reason you like, just as we can.

Stop being stupid.

Yours sincerely,
Not the Feds
 
zomg sulkdodds has tightened his clutch on power and become super moderator!


KATHAKASUNG WAS RI- [censored]
 
I believe his name is actually Kat Hak Sung (of asian descent?). No, as funny as it'd be, he's not signing a letter to his senator with his internet username. Only I do that.
 
But if you stab an idea, it becomes a theory.


Does that make sense in any way? It just popped into my head.
 
Sulkdodds said:
I believe his name is actually Kat Hak Sung (of asian descent?). No, as funny as it'd be, he's not signing a letter to his senator with his internet username. Only I do that.
Click to expand...

That is even odder, with his ramblings of how bush and the feds are out to get him yet he posts his real name on a forum and his username is just his own name with no spaces. You'd think he'd make an effort not to be tracked if his BS was true
 
He is something of a mystery, isn't he? I wonder if he surfs using a proxy server.
 
Sulkdodds said:
Mr Sung, I applaud your intentions, noble as I am sure they are, but the examples of internet forums banning you is a load of horseshit. These are privately-owned websites, and as such they maintain the right to treat their users in any way they please. They don't need a reason or a justification to ban you because you are using their website voluntarily; whether you think it wrong or not it's the law.

There is no evidence nor reason to think that 'feds' and not over-zealous forum admins ban you. They can and will ban you for any reason you like, just as we can.

Stop being stupid.

Yours sincerely,
Not the Feds
Click to expand...

Then tell me the reason to ban me. Political incorrect? Or just because my opinion is not your favor? Is it against any rule?

I have reason to think it was done by Feds. Because the web site of "sign on San Diego" is a host by the media. I have experience with media's site. Even under the pressure of the Feds, (such like "LA times") they would rather shut down the whole site instead of ban me. Because free speech is the most valued principle for media. So I think the censorship of "sign on San Diego" is done by Feds not the web host. (by the way, the censorship was released at that site. I now can post at it again.)

As a matter of fact, I don't care about those ridicule or personal attack. It just revealed what kind of those attackers are. It may prove what I said are truth, they are afraid of it.

------------

502. Warrantless surveillance and August plot (8/13/07)

I think the new law that allowed warrantless surveillance target on me.

In early May, 2002, I wrote "65. Birthday Party on May 3 (5/10)", revealed Feds had a plot on May 3 that year. In later May, two people in my lane - one was my tenant, the other was the landlady of a house, suddenly moved away at same time. They both came from China. (There are four house units in the lane. Feds put two Chinese secret agents in two units) Then in August, news reported that former A.G. Ashcroft was rebuked by FISA judges for cheating in May. I then knew I was under the surveillance of FISA warrant. I started to realize how important the Fourth Amendment is to innocent people. It protects them from unreasonable search and arrest from corrupt agents. (see "86. FISA Secret Court ruling")

Still continuously I am under surveillance, legally or illegally. Feds must have created a lot of justification to renew the warranty. This time, after the big attempt in April, (marked with Virginia Tech massacre) they may exhaust their cheating tactics. Feds, with the help of its resource in legislative, passed a law to do surveillance without the monitor of the court.

Be mind that law is not only effect on a small number people who related to terrorist. Most Americans have computers and surf the internet. Feds have plenty resource of controlled "terrorists". Or anytime they can get help from collaboration of foreign secret police to frame a case. That means, almost every Americans faces unreasonable search and arrest if Feds wanted. (by a message from "terrorist" to your e-mail or web-site you go) They give themselves an unrestricted power.

It is not only an eavesdropping or wiretapping. It also means surveillance which can lead to unreasonable search and arrest. Do you know what surveillance is? To my experience, it also come with harassment and persecution - radiation of unknown EM wave ray; poisoned food; provocation between family members..... various trap to a framed case.

"Enemy combatants" in Guantanamo are ripped the right to access for legal help. They could be jailed all their life. The new warrantless law does the same thing actually. Every Americans is ripped off the protect of Fourth Amendment. You could be under surveillance any time the Feds wanted without any protect of the law.

I e-mailed a petition to California Senators Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein on 8/8. No confirmation e-mail received so far. An e-mail to Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren was rejected as not deliverable. But a reaction from Feds was very swift. Next day on 8/9, my wife said she would have a trip to Peru between 8/16 to 8/22. My brother and one of my sister will go with her. If you still remember, in mid April my wife has just taken a sudden trip too (the plot marked with VT shooting case)

On same day, (8/9) the neighborhood landlord had a yard work team come. He said he would have his yard re-modeled, including repair the fence between us. The work will last till the end of the month.

One of murder tactic of Feds is travel accident. Each big plot always came with this program. So they prepare again the death for part of my family members. As for me, you can expect that yard work team is a specially trained team. And you know what special skill they have had. The plot time should be between 8/16 to 8/22. For the rest of my family member, there is other traps waiting for them.
 
Why is kathaksung so prevalent on the internet? I mean... he's like, everywhere! Why did he choose hl2.net as one of the places he visits?
 
kathaksung said:
Then tell me the reason to ban me. Political incorrect? Or just because my opinion is not your favor? Is it against any rule?

I have reason to think it was done by Feds. Because the web site of "sign on San Diego" is a host by the media. I have experience with media's site. Even under the pressure of the Feds, (such like "LA times") they would rather shut down the whole site instead of ban me. Because free speech is the most valued principle for media. So I think the censorship of "sign on San Diego" is done by Feds not the web host. (by the way, the censorship was released at that site. I now can post at it again.)

As a matter of fact, I don't care about those ridicule or personal attack. It just revealed what kind of those attackers are. It may prove what I said are truth, they are afraid of it.

------------

502. Warrantless surveillance and August plot (8/13/07)

I think the new law that allowed warrantless surveillance target on me.

In early May, 2002, I wrote "65. Birthday Party on May 3 (5/10)", revealed Feds had a plot on May 3 that year. In later May, two people in my lane - one was my tenant, the other was the landlady of a house, suddenly moved away at same time. They both came from China. (There are four house units in the lane. Feds put two Chinese secret agents in two units) Then in August, news reported that former A.G. Ashcroft was rebuked by FISA judges for cheating in May. I then knew I was under the surveillance of FISA warrant. I started to realize how important the Fourth Amendment is to innocent people. It protects them from unreasonable search and arrest from corrupt agents. (see "86. FISA Secret Court ruling")

Still continuously I am under surveillance, legally or illegally. Feds must have created a lot of justification to renew the warranty. This time, after the big attempt in April, (marked with Virginia Tech massacre) they may exhaust their cheating tactics. Feds, with the help of its resource in legislative, passed a law to do surveillance without the monitor of the court.

Be mind that law is not only effect on a small number people who related to terrorist. Most Americans have computers and surf the internet. Feds have plenty resource of controlled "terrorists". Or anytime they can get help from collaboration of foreign secret police to frame a case. That means, almost every Americans faces unreasonable search and arrest if Feds wanted. (by a message from "terrorist" to your e-mail or web-site you go) They give themselves an unrestricted power.

It is not only an eavesdropping or wiretapping. It also means surveillance which can lead to unreasonable search and arrest. Do you know what surveillance is? To my experience, it also come with harassment and persecution - radiation of unknown EM wave ray; poisoned food; provocation between family members..... various trap to a framed case.

"Enemy combatants" in Guantanamo are ripped the right to access for legal help. They could be jailed all their life. The new warrantless law does the same thing actually. Every Americans is ripped off the protect of Fourth Amendment. You could be under surveillance any time the Feds wanted without any protect of the law.

I e-mailed a petition to California Senators Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein on 8/8. No confirmation e-mail received so far. An e-mail to Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren was rejected as not deliverable. But a reaction from Feds was very swift. Next day on 8/9, my wife said she would have a trip to Peru between 8/16 to 8/22. My brother and one of my sister will go with her. If you still remember, in mid April my wife has just taken a sudden trip too (the plot marked with VT shooting case)

On same day, (8/9) the neighborhood landlord had a yard work team come. He said he would have his yard re-modeled, including repair the fence between us. The work will last till the end of the month.

One of murder tactic of Feds is travel accident. Each big plot always came with this program. So they prepare again the death for part of my family members. As for me, you can expect that yard work team is a specially trained team. And you know what special skill they have had. The plot time should be between 8/16 to 8/22. For the rest of my family member, there is other traps waiting for them.
Click to expand...
You probably just got banned for spamming your conspiracy theory crap. Luckily (?) we're not that hard-nosed here.
 
Well you're right and you're wrong Stigmata, often, a lot of his posts are edited by the FBI to read "I LIKE BIG BUTTS AND I CANNOT LIE!", which is clearly a conspiracy by the Feds to keep him quiet, not a moderator having fun.

Anyway, Kathaksung, I can give you one example for a reason to ban you: One admin on a site you post on warned you quite elaborately to not post conspiracy theories about the recent school massacre. Common logic dictates that this was not because it was politically incorrect, but because 32 people died and many more were wounded. Just like 9/11, if you make a conspiracy theory out of people's death, you're a real creep.

By the way - Now I really am interested: Do you surf the web through a proxy server, Kathaksung?
 
kathaksung, this is all a joke isn't it? You can't possibly be serious about the shit you post.
 
DreamThrall said:
http://www.nationmultimedia.com/board/general/view.php?id=446&offset=0
http://pub8.bravenet.com/forum/611742271/2
http://www.google.com/search?q="kat...s=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
Click to expand...

oh it's much much worse than that, according to kathkasung halflife2.net mods = FBI


kathkasung said:
Yesterday(11/19), I posted " 447. Dirty bomb and Iran war (11/10/06)" in a thread in halflife.com forum. Ten minutes later, I went back to that thread and found the whole article was missing. Instead there was a sentence "You bore me" which was not written by me. The Feds doesn't want people know the truth. They even replaced my article with their own words and made it look like written by me.
Click to expand...

:O

http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p=618366
http://www.freedominion.ca/phpBB2/v...tart=375&sid=b145e034c9b231a761cf728da3e2ede2
http://my.expatica.com/c:fr/forum/v...previous&sid=17f88d39006ce5e62cfa296020c4b75c
 
DreamThrall said:
LOL, imagine how funny that post sounds from another forum...
Click to expand...

probably not as funny as this post sounds to us:

kathaksung said:
A decade ago, I was charged by a dog several times. The dog rushed to me, looked like intending to bite my hand. I had to raise the hand high to avoid to be bit.

Later I thought the dog did not intend to attack. It was a dog trained to sniff the hand to see if it contaminated with drug. The dog looked ugly: crazy, thin, dirty, most of hair were off with pink skin exposed in the air. I was angry. Those agents abused the dog, harassed innocent people, carrying out such operation as their job. That dog obviously was heavy addicted, wouldn't live long.

In April and May this year, there were many rainy days. In mid-night, I often heard a dog whimpering. Until in early May when I have read the news of Marijuana (see #316), I then knew Feds framed the case a marijuana one. It solved my puzzle of unusual wet days and the sobbing dog. I think it was another dog trained to sniff the sprouting marijuana. The whimper of the dog reminded me of that heavy addicted dog Feds sent on me ten years ago.
Click to expand...




:O

http://www.captaincynic.com/thread/49685/1/prophecy.htm
 
ya dogs can be scary especially when they bark and bees come out ...bees trained by the feds
 
Why would the FBI waste time moderating public forums and banning some loser on the internet?
 
tehsolace said:
Why would the FBI waste time moderating public forums and banning some loser on the internet?
Click to expand...


because he's a danger to national security so instead of sending him to Guantanamo to be water boarded till he's a compliant little terrorist he's banned from the internets
 
Sir Phoenixx said:
http://pub8.bravenet.com/forum/611742271/fetch/637299/2

:LOL:

Yeah, the FBI would be able to or want to affect the climate for an entire area/city just to get you to take a bath... :thumbs:
Click to expand...

not just kathaksung ..but france as well:

Kathaksung said:
1. All these cases broke the area record or state record. It means the weather control is a skilled technique for Feds. The scale of the disaster reflected the pressure the working team undertook. They went crazy trying to finish my case.

2. Feds don't care the lives of innocent people. The death toll caused by heat is above 125 in California so far. The hurricane killed more. Remember in #218 I talked about the heat wave in France that killed tens of thousands in 2003. It was a revenge for the France's opposition to the Iraq war.
Click to expand...


giant solar death ray ftmfw!!!
 
Yesterday(11/19), I posted " 447. Dirty bomb and Iran war (11/10/06)" in a thread in halflife.com forum. Ten minutes later, I went back to that thread and found the whole article was missing. Instead there was a sentence "You bore me" which was not written by me. The Feds doesn't want people know the truth. They even replaced my article with their own words and made it look like written by me.
Click to expand...

Jeez, that's almost as funny as the time bin Laden released his video to the world complaining about the time when he got banned from www.mylittlepony-forums.com and blamed it on the Americans for electing Bush twice.
 
comradebadger = Federal Agent:


Kathaksung said:
This is not my words. My original post was changed in minutes. By surveillance team, I think. (my comment when I refill #447)

COMRADE: Nope, edited by me - I find it amusing. (Comrade Badger made a second delete and admit the words was left by him. )
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

MFL
Fascinating look at the ongoing psychological evolution of flat hieirarchies.
Replies
2
Views
2K
Tollbooth Willie
Tollbooth Willie
B
Community Interviews: Final Exchange development team
Replies
0
Views
5K
Barnz
B
B
The other cancelled ports of Half-Life
Replies
3
Views
7K
Tollbooth Willie
Tollbooth Willie
B
The leaked maps of the Half-Life 2 episodes - Part 2
Replies
0
Views
9K
Barnz
B
B
Hostile Takeover, the lost Half-Life expansion pack
Replies
6
Views
16K
Ennui
Ennui
Back
Top