Terror attack and Al Qaida

This is bullshit. You guys are embarrassing yourselves by propagating this load of crap.

If this were true they would be taking up arms against the government... not marching around with sings yelling at people to "please believe me, I'm not crazy" lines.
 
It's kind of hard to take up arms against the government when you're in a ridiculous minority and everyone thinks you're crazy.

Just saying.
 
the best idea would be to play along and when they charge, the sane people remain where they are while the crazies are machine gunned. problem solved
 
It's kind of hard to take up arms against the government when you're in a ridiculous minority and everyone thinks you're crazy.

Just saying.

Ridiculous minority always rant loud because they are paid to do so. We are the silent majority.

Americans Question Bush on 9/11 Intelligence
October 14, 2006

- Many adults in the United States believe the current federal government has not been completely forthcoming on the issue of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, according to a poll by the New York Times and CBS News. 53 per cent of respondents think the Bush administration is hiding something, and 28 per cent believe it is lying.

Only 16 per cent of respondents say the government headed by U.S. president George W. Bush is telling the truth on what it knew prior to the terrorist attacks, down five points since May 2002.

.................................. Oct. 2006.........May 2002
Telling the truth.................16%.............21%
Hiding something ................53%............65%
Mostly lying .......................28%.............8%
Not sure .............................3% ............6%

Source: The New York Times / CBS News
Methodology: Telephone interviews with 983 American adults, conducted from Oct. 5 to Oct. 8, 2006. Margin of error is 4 per cent.

http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/americans_question_bush_on_9_11_intelligence/

http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/inde...m/itemID/13469 http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/index.cfm/fuseaction/viewItem/itemID/13469
 
Evidence Refutes the Official 9/11 Investigation: The Scientific Forensic Facts


by Richard Gage and Gregg Roberts
Global Research, October 13, 2010
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth - 2010-10-04

AE911Truth Delivers the Evidence to the Media: Press Conference - National Press Club – Washington DC

Ed. – This is the actual 10-minute statement read by Richard Gage, AIA, to the media at the AE911Truth press conference at the National Press Club in Washington DC on September 9, 2010.
Good afternoon, my name is Richard Gage, AIA. I’m a member of the American Institute of Architects; I’ve been a licensed architect for 22 years; And I’m the founder of the non-profit organization, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth).

As a group, we now have more than 1,270 architect and engineer petition signers. Collectively, we have more than 25,000 years of building and technical experience. This press conference is being given by our petition signers and supporters today in 65 [it turned out to be 67] locations around the world, including 30 states and 4 countries.

Today, we’re here to inform you that we have uncovered evidence that the official investigations into what happened to the World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11 were deeply flawed, or worse. The scientific forensic facts we have discovered have very troubling implications.

For example, a technologically advanced, highly energetic material has been discovered in World Trade Center dust from the 9/11 catastrophe.

This follows the discovery, by the United States Geological Survey and others, of high concentrations of unusual previously molten iron-rich microspheres in the WTC dust. These microspheres can only have been formed during the destruction of the World Trade Center at temperatures far higher than can be explained by the jet fuel and office fires. Those fires, we are told by engineers employed by NIST, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, were allegedly the cause of the World Trade Center’s destruction. The discovery of this advanced energetic material, in the form of red/gray chips distributed throughout the dust, both explains the iron-rich microspheres and confirms the inadequacy of the official account of what happened that tragic day.

Even before the microspheres and red/gray chips had been identified and brought to our attention, we were deeply concerned about other aspects of the destruction of these iconic buildings, and how they were investigated. More than two dozen firefighters, engineers, and other witnesses reported seeing substantial quantities of molten iron or steel, flowing like lava in the debris under all three World Trade Center high-rises. Office fires and jet fuel cannot possibly reach the temperatures necessary to liquefy iron or steel. A mixture called thermite, consisting of pulverized iron oxide and aluminum, CAN generate temperatures above 4000°F -- far more than is needed to melt iron or steel, which melts at about 2750°F.

The energetic material that was found in the WTC dust by an international team of scientists (led by Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen in Denmark) was reported in the peer-reviewed Bentham Open Journal of Chemical Physics. It consists of nano-engineered iron oxide and aluminum particles 1000th the size of a human hair, embedded in another substance consisting of carbon, oxygen, and silicon. The sizes of the iron oxide particles are extremely uniform, and neither they nor the ultra-fine-grain aluminum platelets could possibly have been created by a natural process such as a gravitational collapse or the impact of jetliners. The red/gray chips in which these particles were found exhibit the same characteristics as advanced energetic materials developed in US national laboratories in the years leading up to 9/11. They have no reason to be in this dust. Given all the horrific costs in human lives, lost civil liberties, and trillions of tax dollars spent in response to the official account of 9/11, there can be no more urgent need than for our country and the world to find out who put those materials in the World Trade Center – and why.
.....

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=21436
 
do you read what you post Kathaksung?


please explain how this "energetic material" refutes the Official 9/11 Investigation? the statements is basically saying "we found this material, we'd like an official investigation as to how it got there". it's NOT saying "we found this material so that means you people were behind 9/11" like you're claiming
 
The nano grade material could only be produced in military weapon factory. That''s all.

-------------

Twelve New England towns demand 9/11 reinvestigation
Published: 04 March, 2010, 07:21
Edited: 15 September, 2010, 07:55

A new movement to reinvestigate the 9/11 attacks is gaining pace in the US. With major public support, 12 towns are set to decide whether to ask the federal government for a new independent probe.

New York is dubbed as the Empire State for its wealth and resources and is rightfully regarded as America’s most famous city, a beacon of fashion, finance and fast paced action.

http://rt.com/usa/news/twelve-new-england-towns/
 
Back
Top