The best UFO video's youve ever seen.

clarky003

Tank
Joined
Nov 8, 2003
Messages
6,123
Reaction score
1
There are tonnes out there, weither the interesting ones are all genuine or not who knows.

Starting the thread I found this pretty damned convincing short but quite detailed video from brazil, that supposedly shows some kind of unidentified craft flying low over a river.

left clicky
 
they asked me for login but i didn't ---- I am lazy these days
 
Yeh sorry :( it was linked from another forum, but if anyone wants to see it the forum does'nt require email registration. The forum maybe crazy but they have some interesting stuff over there. Anyway ^ topic.
 
hahaahhaha that video is priceless! No way is that a UFO, why would they be filming there, or not moving the camera to see it better. And if it a stationary un-maned camera why is the clip so short, why does it look like a star trek spaceship, did the aliens get their space cruiser ideas from us!? Quality stuff though.

anyone wanna download it (tiny file)

username: halflife2
password: 12345
 
Hectic Glenn said:
hahaahhaha that video is priceless! No way is that a UFO, why would they be filming there, or not moving the camera to see it better. And if it a stationary un-maned camera why is the clip so short, why does it look like a star trek spaceship, did the aliens get their space cruiser ideas from us!? Quality stuff though.

anyone wanna download it (tiny file)

username: halflife2
password: 12345
I got a good chuckle out of it.
 
clarky003 said:
There are tonnes out there, weither the interesting ones are all genuine or not who knows.

Starting the thread I found this pretty damned convincing short but quite detailed video from brazil, that supposedly shows some kind of unidentified craft flying low over a river.

left clicky
Pretty well done video if you ask me.
 
I saw this red light outside, across the fields the other day, it was a light, spinning around in a circle, its still there actually.

I might go see what it is tommorow.
 
Do you seriously believe in every pile of shit that humans spit out that isn't "conventionary?" Did you like, make a list of all the stuff that is really dumb and generally not believed in because of its stupidity and decide to believe in every last single one of them?

Damn, dude. Just damn.
 
"overunity.com The international free energy research forum"

LOL UFOES

"Starting the thread I found this pretty damned convincing short but quite detailed video from brazil, that supposedly shows some kind of unidentified craft flying low over a river."

They come from the planet CGI, in search of better renders. :p

Seriously, it's easy to spot rendered lighting, and this is it.
Your hoaxer got overconfident by making it move slow enough to show off this handiwork.

Do you seriously believe in every pile of shit that humans spit out that isn't "conventionary?" Did you like, make a list of all the stuff that is really dumb and generally not believed in because of its stupidity and decide to believe in every last single one of them?

Damn, dude. Just damn.
QFMMFT

lol lol free energy research forum.


"Adamski said the ET, named Orthon, was from Venus
[...]
Adamski later claimed to meet other people from other planets (mostly from Venus but also from Mars and Saturn) and said he was taken on flights by them, including one around the moon where he observed valleys and bases.
[...]
The discovery that Venus and other planets in the solar system were unable to sustain any form of life, however, severely damaged his integrity. He said that photographs taken by the first Soviet lunar probe in 1959 were fakes, and after he announced he was going to Saturn for a conference, many of his supporters became disaffected and his reputation rapidly declined."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Adamski
 
Then again, some people will always reject any UFO-related footage.
 
lol, cant you tell mecha 'aka Interweb Tuvok' loves me.

The phrase 'free energy' is misleading, its nowhere near that black and white. You begin to qualify to comment if you fully understand COP and efficiency and how 'overunity' refers to COP not efficiency which can never exceed 100%, for example in this video clip here, you are putting next to no energy in other than letting the magnet's go, and getting quite alot of energy out in the work of acceleration, if the track was infinite or longer it would keep accelerating to a terminal velocity. This is what is meant by 'overunity' COP exceeds 1, 'you' are putting less work in than your visibly getting out.
 
clarky003 said:
lol, cant you tell mecha 'aka Interweb Tuvok' loves me.

The phrase 'free energy' is misleading, its nowhere near that black and white. You begin to qualify to comment if you fully understand COP and efficiency and how 'overunity' refers to COP not efficiency which can never exceed 100%, for example in this video clip here, you are putting next to no energy in other than letting the magnet's go, and getting quite alot of acceleration energy out if the track was infinite was longer it would keep accelerating to a terminal velocity.

Uh, no it wouldn't. The space car very clearly slows down to a stop.
Also, energy is expended by pulling the car back in the first place.
You are not going to get constant or even "cheap" acceleration from this device.

If you could, you wouldn't be posting on the "research forum" and instead have already figured out that you only need to build a circular track and not one of infinte length.

Then, when you test your circular track, you'll see that magnets on their own do not cause accelleration.
The act of pulling the car away from the magnets did.
Once it reaches the magnets, the energy gained by the attractive force gradually dissipates, and the car stops like it did there.
It is an equal-but-opposite reaction that doesn't gain more energy than it loses. it only takes a while to run out.
Children's wind-up toys run on the same principle.

lol I refuted the entire "international research organization" in two minutes flat. :p

What the hell is an "interweb tuvok" anyways?
 
Ok. Seriously. If there are so many UFO recordings, so many damn pictures and videos and eye witness reports and blah blah, how come not ONE of them is a high-res shot/video? Not one?
 
Well ive observed differently.

From the starting position it doesnt have to be pulled back, you could simply just place it there, it transverses the whole track with 'no' human input, with acceleration until the opposing field is exposed. The acceleration occurs because the opposing poles are blocking field loops by the angle and proximity of the magnet's, the car magnet's get pulled back because there exposed to the opposing side of the field when it gets to the end of the track, ie. the angles offset the field balance toward the end of the track. With high grade magnetic shielding it would be simple to limit the distance of the effect on that opposite lobe of the field, which would stop the magnet's being pulled back, as it would tip the balance of the field interaction over distance, creating a non symmetry of the field over distance.

But anyway that's some of the research thats taking place, and its interesting despite conventional thought.

I watched the whole thing. And it was pretty cool. I thought the crop circles were ****ing amazing. And I'm sure the host was an alien.

I thought that 2005 conference was pretty awsome too, all those ufo's in the sky in that one video are cool.
 
Nope, sorry clark. That's not how things work.

The magnets only serve to prolong the dissipation of the energy from the initial "push" caused by the attractive force.

Simply build a circular track (it can't cost more than a hundred bucks) and you'll see that your infinite energy machine doesn't work the way you think it does.


As for the UFOes, every (and I mean every) time a clear photo exists, it is always the first to be disproven.
That brazil space-ship, as an example is a pretty blatant render, and even the pixelation doesn't disguise it.

The rest depend on their position in the sky to remove any context from their position. They never show cast shadows, and are usually glowing or pitch black to cover up other indications of size or distance. It's the definition of inconclusive.
 
Let's just keep this on topic of one of the crazy stupid-ass things Clarky believes in, shall we?
 
A track 40 or 200 times as long as that one will work the same, the car would be placed at the correct end, and the offset field would drag the magnet's accelerating the car all the way to the end (the offset drags them towards the end and will always drag them towards the end no matter the length of track, if it was a balanced dissapation it would finish in the middle of the track), there is no starting pull back or push to start with he is simply letting it go on the field.

The track your thinking of wont work because the circular field would be in balance and would lock up because of the symmetry of the field, however you can create a non symmetrical field over distance with shielding of the unwanted parts of the field, that way over distance you get a stronger interaction from the useful side of the field and a weaker interaction with the unwanted part.

But anyway yes back on topic.
 
I believe in aliens but I highly doubt any have visited this planet recently.
 
Before we head back onto topic, I'm curious about a few things.

For example, exactly what the hell kind of field are we talking about here?
I'm talking about a magnetic field, since, you know, your toy car is being pushed by magnets.
How exactly does making a circle suddenly "unbalance" how magnets work?

What you have there, by all appearances is the equivalent of a maglev train, without the switchable electromagnets that are required to make it accelerate.
Without the electromagnets, you are left with what I'm going to call an "entropy retarder".
It prolongs the force from the initial push, but the constant force of the magnets is not enough to combat cumulative mechanical energy loss.

calrky9eo.jpg


Now, I don't want to derail this thread any more than I have already, so if you could start a new one about your broken maglev (since it's your claim), I'm curious to discuss this further.
 
think about it man, we dont even know EVERY creature on our own planet, and we expect to know what is out there?

we havent even been to the bottom of our own ocean, but we act like we know what is out in space?
 
As a visual effects artist, i can tell you that it's possible to fake those videos, but incredibly difficult.
 
Does anyone notice that almost all of those happened beside mexico city?
 
Back
Top