Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
That demo sucks assGargantou said:
This requires a system with an intel processor w/ HyperThreading to play! This doesn't function on AMD CPU machines.
QFT. Nearly all (imo) hardcore gamers go for AMD's if they know what they're doing.babyheadcrab said:failllllllllllllllllll
lol, you sound like a marketing spy ...dekstar said:QFT. Nearly all (imo) hardcore gamers go for AMD's if they know what they're doing.
dekstar said:QFT. Nearly all (imo) hardcore gamers go for AMD's if they know what they're doing.
Raziaar said:I used to be an AMD fan. I bought my first Intel chip at a time when AMD was a loser in speed and price. Not to mention my Intel will never overheat and burn up compared to an amd, as it has safety protection should my fan fail or something.
Garfield_ said:You must be talking about the old AMD's. The new AMD's never get hotter than around 30*C compared to Intel P4's that usually gets 50-60*C
Raziaar said:I'm talking about back in 2003 when I bought my computer for halfllife 2. Not to mention I sort of had a vow for a while that I was never going to put on another mother****ing amd heatsink again, due to the extreme frusterations in the past of having to use a screwdriver to slip it on, and it was inferior enough that I slipped and jammed the screwdriver tip into the motherboard(I had to use that much force). Thankfully it wasn't broken.
DEATH eVADER said:The heatsinks that come with 64bit AMD chips, are easy to install as turning the oven onto the right temperature.
I went for the oven as an example, because difficulty is varied between people. The difficulty ranges between Easy, and downright ludicrous to the point where you could fit 10 on in 45 seconds
Idonotbelonghere said:Maybe yours was broken/bent somewhere. My AMD 3700 that I recently bought was a pain to install the heatsink on because some metal part was bent...
I'm notMuToiD_MaN said:lol, you sound like a marketing spy ...
dekstar said:I'm not
*subliminal message: Buy AMD!*
*runs*
The Pentium Extreme Edition marks real progress for Intel on multiple fronts. It is the fastest all-around desktop CPU that Intel has ever produced, and thanks to its faster bus, larger cache, and higher clock speeds, the Extreme Edition 955 consistently outruns the older Extreme Edition 840. These features, combined with NVIDIA's multithreaded graphics drivers, even make the Extreme Edition 955 a reasonably solid choice for 3D gaming—faster than the P4 Extreme Edition 3.73GHz, believe it or not. At the same time, the Extreme Edition 955 consumes less power at peak than the Extreme Edition 840, proving that Intel's 65nm fabrication process can deliver the tangible benefits that we've come to expect from a die shrink. That's comforting news after our faith was shaken by the Pentium 4's power and heat problems at 90nm. Not only that, but there's apparently quite a bit of clock frequency headroom left in this 3.46GHz processor. Ours ran stable for hours at 4.26GHz with nary a hiccup.
babyheadcrab said:Intel actually just 1up'd AMD...
http://techreport.com/reviews/2006q1/fx60-vs-955xe/index.x?pg=1
THAT SAID! I'm still the proud owner of a dual core AMD chip
techreport said:Our test results make it clear, however, that Intel probably won't be able to catch up with AMD using processors based on the Netburst microarchitecture; it will have to wait for its new microarchitecture for that. Despite being produced at 90nm and having a much lower clock speed, the Athlon 64 FX-60 nearly ran the tables in our array of benchmarks, and it did so while consuming less power—both at idle and under load—than the Pentium Extreme Edition 955. The FX-60's performance dominance wasn't always deep, but it was very wide, with the top spot in only a few tests going to an Intel processor.
Raziaar said:One thing that has always pissed me off About AMD... is their names. Why the hell can't they just be speifically clear what gigahertz their processors are, without having these funky names, like 2800 and stuff, yanno? Because with amd, as far as I know, 2800 is not a 2.8ghz.
satch919 said:Shouldn't this hardware talk go in the Hardware & Software board?
More talk about the games and less about processors.
boglito said:Too bad there is absolutely nothing to talk about yet, though.
"prerendered trailers look good..."
.bog.
Iced_Eagle said:All UE3 stuff is real-time man.
Unless Epic has been lying to us this whole time.
http://www.computerandvideogames.co...com/interviews/interviews_story.php?id=134530
New Mark Rein interview.
satch919 said:Everything that's been shown on Gears of War and UT2007 has been real-time.
Have you not seen the old Huxley walkthrough video? The one where the car comes skidding in and soldiers jumping out. There's no doubt that's in-game. I think that looks better than the latest trailer.boglito said:The u2k7 videos are just base enough that I might believe that. GoW and various other videos (huxley trailers spring to mind) are mostly prerendered. There is nothing anyone can say to prove that wrong untill a playable demo/game is available, so don't bother.
Basically if you take 10 videos of unreal tech, and you pick the two "worst" ones, then those are the two that are not prerendered.
.bog.
boglito said:The u2k7 videos are just base enough that I might believe that. GoW and various other videos (huxley trailers spring to mind) are mostly prerendered. There is nothing anyone can say to prove that wrong untill a playable demo/game is available, so don't bother.
Basically if you take 10 videos of unreal tech, and you pick the two "worst" ones, then those are the two that are not prerendered.
.bog.