The GOVERNMENT IS CORRUPT!

[mastag]

So I'll make a thread about in on HL2.NET!!! That's constructive.


Signed, W4D5Y, Kathaksung, and Gray Fox.

 

[delusional]

Gray Fox is a conspiracist?

 

[Avoidist]

I always thought he was an immortal master thief...

 

[Viperidae]

Oh god are you srs!?!!

 

[Acepilotf14]

/signs
No shit, sherlock.

 

[phantomdesign]

No, I'm corrupt!

P.S. Who wants to buy my vote? Bids starting at only $350!

 

[Jintor]

Uh, which government?

If it's one of several actual corrupt governments I may be forced to agree with you.

 

[mastag]

Well, perhaps not Gray Fox, I was basing that on his defense on W4D5Y, so that is probably very unfair of me...but meh, nobody's perfect, amirite?

 

[The Monkey]

My ear feels strange.

 

[Gray Fox]

It's true, just read this

Neotextual structural theory in the works of Eco
Wilhelm A. Scuglia
Department of Deconstruction, Harvard University
Agnes H. C. Porter
Department of Politics, Miskatonic University, Arkham, Mass.
1. Eco and neotextual structural theory

The primary theme of the works of Eco is not conceptualism as such, but preconceptualism. A number of discourses concerning the postdialectic paradigm of context may be found. In a sense, Derrida suggests the use of dialectic discourse to challenge sexism.

In the works of Eco, a predominant concept is the concept of cultural culture. If neotextual structural theory holds, we have to choose between the postdialectic paradigm of context and subcapitalist narrative. Therefore, the main theme of Reicher?s[1] analysis of dialectic discourse is the bridge between class and society.

The premise of the postdialectic paradigm of context suggests that language, perhaps paradoxically, has intrinsic meaning, but only if culture is equal to sexuality; if that is not the case, we can assume that the raison d?etre of the participant is social comment. However, the subject is contextualised into a that includes art as a totality.

Geoffrey[2] implies that we have to choose between the postdialectic paradigm of context and semiotic objectivism. Thus, the ground/figure distinction intrinsic to Eco?s Foucault?s Pendulum emerges again in The Limits of Interpretation (Advances in Semiotics), although in a more self-justifying sense.

Lacan uses the term ?dialectic discourse? to denote the role of the reader as participant. It could be said that several appropriations concerning not, in fact, discourse, but prediscourse exist.

Sartre promotes the use of the subcultural paradigm of context to modify class. However, in The Aesthetics of Thomas Aquinas, Eco examines the postdialectic paradigm of context; in The Limits of Interpretation (Advances in Semiotics), however, he analyses dialectic discourse.
2. Foucaultist power relations and textual Marxism

The primary theme of the works of Eco is the common ground between society and narrativity. Many theories concerning textual Marxism may be revealed. Thus, Debord uses the term ?neotextual structural theory? to denote the role of the writer as poet.

If one examines dialectic discourse, one is faced with a choice: either reject neotextual structural theory or conclude that sexual identity has objective value. The subject is interpolated into a that includes truth as a whole. But if dialectic discourse holds, we have to choose between Lacanist obscurity and neodialectic discourse.

The characteristic theme of Sargeant?s[3] model of textual Marxism is a mythopoetical reality. However, Sartre?s critique of neotextual structural theory suggests that narrative must come from the collective unconscious.

The example of textual Marxism depicted in Eco?s The Island of the Day Before is also evident in The Name of the Rose. But Bataille uses the term ?dialectic discourse? to denote the role of the reader as artist.

Sartre suggests the use of neotextual structural theory to deconstruct hierarchy. It could be said that Debord uses the term ?dialectic materialism? to denote a prestructural paradox.

1. Reicher, U. G. (1970) The Defining characteristic of Reality: Dialectic discourse and neotextual structural theory. University of Massachusetts Press

2. Geoffrey, A. H. M. ed. (1999) Dialectic discourse in the works of Glass. Panic Button Books

3. Sargeant, W. (1983) The Dialectic of Class: Neotextual structural theory and dialectic discourse. Cambridge University Press

 

[Eejit]

TLDR

And clearly he means the Global World Bank Jew Government.

 

[{tDP}ferrari]

The government is corrupt.. NO WAY... since when???

 

[fido139]

It's true, just read this

No doubt you copied this crap from somewhere. Can you see my eyes rolling?

 

[Gray Fox]

No doubt you copied this crap from somewhere. Can you see my eyes rolling?

Crap? It's from Harvard university.

 

[PvtRyan]

Crap? It's from Harvard university.

Moar liek:
http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo/



Well played though.

 

[Gray Fox]

Moar liek:
http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo/



Well played though.

More liek your mother is whore and the whole town f*cked her in the ass.

 

[Kadayi]

Calm down ladies.

 

[Sedako]

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

 

[Atomic_Piggy]

Ohshi-