The History of France:

xcellerate

Tank
Joined
Dec 7, 2004
Messages
3,961
Reaction score
1
Sorry if you've read it before, but it's new to me:

- Gallic Wars
- Lost. In a war whose ending foreshadows the next 2000 years of French history, France is conquered by of all things, an Italian.

- Hundred Years War
- Mostly lost, saved at last by female schizophrenic who inadvertently creates The First Rule of French Warfare; "France's armies are victorious only when not led by a Frenchman." Sainted.

- Italian Wars
- Lost. France becomes the first and only country to ever lose two wars when fighting Italians.

- Wars of Religion
- France goes 0-5-4 against the Huguenots

- Thirty Years War
- France is technically not a participant, but manages to get invaded anyway. Claims a tie on the basis that eventually the other participants started ignoring her.

- War of Revolution
- Tied. Frenchmen take to wearing red flowerpots as chapeaux.

- The Dutch War
- Tied

- War of the Augsburg League/King William's War/French and Indian War
- Lost, but claimed as a tie. Three ties in a row induces deluded Frogophiles the world over to label the period as the height of French military power.

- War of the Spanish Succession
- Lost. The War also gave the French their first taste of a Marlborough, which they have loved every since.

- American Revolution
- In a move that will become quite familiar to future Americans, France claims a win even though the English colonists saw far more action. This is later known as "de Gaulle Syndrome", and leads to the Second Rule of French Warfare; "France only wins when America does most of the fighting."

- French Revolution
- Won, primarily due the fact that the opponent was also French.

- The Napoleonic Wars
- Lost. Temporary victories (remember the First Rule!) due to leadership of a Corsican, who ended up being no match for a British footwear designer.

- The Franco-Prussian War
- Lost. Germany first plays the role of drunk Frat boy to France's ugly girl home alone on a Saturday night.

- World War I
- Tied and on the way to losing, France is saved by the United States. Thousands of French women find out what it's like to not only sleep with a winner, but one who doesn't call her "Fraulein." Sadly, widespread use of condoms by American forces forestalls any improvement in the French bloodline.

- World War II
- Lost. Conquered French liberated by the United States and Britain just as they finish learning the Horst Wessel Song.

- War in Indochina
- Lost. French forces plead sickness; take to bed with the Dien Bien Flu

- Algerian Rebellion
- Lost. Loss marks the first defeat of a western army by a Non-Turkic Muslim force since the Crusades, and produces the First Rule of Muslim Warfare; "We can always beat the French." This rule is identical to the First Rules of the Italians, Russians, Germans, English, Dutch, Spanish, Vietnamese and Esquimaux.

- War on Terrorism
- France, keeping in mind its recent history, surrenders to Germans and Muslims just to be safe. Attempts to surrender to Vietnamese ambassador fail after he takes refuge in a McDonald's.

The question for any country silly enough to count on the French should not be "Can we count on the French?", but rather "How long until France collapses?"

"Going to war without France is like going deer hunting without an accordion. All you do is leave behind a lot of noisy baggage."

Or, better still, the quote from last week's Wall Street Journal: "They're there when they need you."

With only an hour and a half of research, Jonathan Duczkowski provided the following losses:

Norse invasions, 841-911.
After having their way with the French for 70 years, the Norse are bribed by a French King named Charles the Simple (really!) who gave them Normandy in return for peace. Normans proceed to become just about the only positive military bonus in France's [favour] for next 500 years.

Mexico, 1863-1864.
France attempts to take advantage of Mexico's weakness following its thorough thrashing by the U.S. 20 years earlier ("Halls of Montezuma"). Not surprisingly, the only unit to distinguish itself is the French Foreign Legion (consisting of, by definition, non-Frenchmen). Booted out of the country a little over a year after arrival.

Panama jungles 1881-1890.
No one but nature to fight, France still loses; canal is eventually built by the U.S. 1904-1914.

Napoleonic Wars.
Should be noted that the Grand Armee was largely (~%50) composed of non-Frenchmen after 1804 or so. Mainly disgruntled minorities and anti-monarchists. Not surprisingly, these performed better than the French on many occasions.

Haiti, 1791-1804.
French defeated by rebellion after sacrificing 4,000 Poles to yellow fever. Shows another rule of French warfare; when in doubt, send an ally.

India, 1673-1813.
British were far more charming then French, ended up victors. Therefore the British are well known for their tea, and the French for their whine (er, wine...). Ensures 200 years of bad teeth in England.

Barbary Wars, middle ages-1830.
Pirates in North Africa continually harass European shipping in Meditteranean. France's solution: pay them to leave us alone. America's solution: kick their asses ("the Shores of Tripoli"). [America's] first overseas victories, won 1801-1815.

1798-1801, Quasi-War with U.S.
French privateers (semi-legal pirates) attack U.S. shipping. U.S. fights France at sea for 3 years; French eventually cave; sets precedent for next 200 years of Franco-American relations.

Moors in Spain, late 700s-early 800s.
Even with Charlemagne leading them against an enemy living in a hostile land, French are unable to make much progress. Hide behind Pyrennes until the modern day.

French-on-French losses (probably should be counted as victories too, just to be fair):

1208: Albigenses Crusade, French massacared by French.
When asked how to differentiate a heretic from the faithful, response was "Kill them all. God will know His own." Lesson: French are badasses when fighting unarmed men, women and children.

St. Bartholomew Day Massacre, August 24, 1572.
Once again, French-on-French slaughter.

Third Crusade.
Philip Augustus of France throws hissy-fit, leaves Crusade for Richard the Lion Heart to finish.

Seventh Crusade.
St. Louis of France leads Crusade to Egypt. Resoundingly crushed.

[Eighth] Crusade.
St. Louis back in action, this time in Tunis. See Seventh Crusade.

Also should be noted that France attempted to hide behind the Maginot line, sticking their head in the sand and pretending that the Germans would enter France that way. By doing so, the Germans would have been breaking with their traditional route of invading France, entering through Belgium (Napoleonic Wars, Franco-Prussian War, World War I, etc.). French ignored this though, and put all their effort into these defenses.

Thomas Whiteley has submitted this addition to me:

Seven year War 1756-1763
Lost: after getting hammered by Frederick the Great of Prussia (yep, the Germans again) at Rossbach, the French were held off for the remainder of the War by Frederick of Brunswick and a hodge-podge army including some Brits. War also saw France kicked out of Canada (Wolfe at Quebec) and India (Clive at Plassey).

Richard Mann, an American in France wants to add the following:

The French consider the departure of the French from Algeria in 1962-63, after 130 years on colonialism, as a French victory and especially consider C. de Gaulle as a hero for 'leading' said victory over the unwilling French public who were very much against the departure. This ended their colonialism. About 2 million ungrateful Algerians lost their lives in this shoddy affair.
 
Okay, discounting the fact that there are more historical fallacies in that one post than in a japanese history textbook, what's your point?

Obviously the French are a great world power and a powerful, advanced country. I'm sure someone could come up with something equally ridiculous based on American slaughter.
 
i pulled this off albino black sheep, this wasn't my writing before you guys start ripping me limb from limb.
 
i was seriously going to post in the other thread that France is winless in the war column
 
xcellerate said:
i pulled this off albino black sheep, this wasn't my writing before you guys start ripping me limb from limb.

I'm sure black albino sheep is an awesome resource for world history. Probably all the way up there with ebaumsworld and newgrounds.
 
TheSomeone said:
Okay, discounting the fact that there are more historical fallacies in that one post than in a japanese history textbook, what's your point?
historical fallacies? Is that like, old guys with beards?

EDIT: oh wait, that's follicles, nvm...
 
Que-Ever said:
historical fallacies? Is that like, old guys with beards?

EDIT: oh wait, that's follicles, nvm...

Hahaha, WTF of the thread award :thumbs:.
 
Preetty funny, who ever wrote that surely failled history class as 90% is inacurate.
 
from the "End of the world" flash video.


Fire Zee Missiles!!!!
 
Adrien C said:
Preetty funny, who ever wrote that surely failled history class as 90% is inacurate.

Which parts are inaccurate? just wondering
 
Zeus said:
Which parts are inaccurate? just wondering

Tried looking for the accurate parts, thinking it easier, couldn't find any.

I'm not too worried about people swallowing this shit anyways, because they most likely already hate the french, won't make them any worse. Actually, it'll make them even more ridiculous if they try to use it in an argument.
 
Zeus said:
Which parts are inaccurate? just wondering
Don't know too much about French history but I can point this one out:

Gallic Wars: Fight between the Celtic "gauls" and the Romans, fact is there is no such thing as the french at this point. The gauls were defeated and were driven north into Britain and Ireland. Later on the Germans came and invaded France, Italy, and so forth. Eventually the settled Franks (the German invaders) due to living alongside Romans and the few remaining Celts slowly adopted the Roman Vulgar latin (Latin of the common people) which then evolved into modern French, Italian, and Spanish. In other words a modern French man is of mostly Germanic decent who speaks a descended version of Latin.
 
Go to Google and type "French Military Victories" and click "I'm Feeling Lucky."
 
Moto-x_Pat said:
Go to Google and type "French Military Victories" and click "I'm Feeling Lucky."

I have a vague sense of fear of Google's "Im feeling Lucky" think. I keep thinking I'll type in, well, whatever, and ending up at something about sex with animals. Not conducive to a peaceful state of mind.
 
old..........................................................................
 
What happens if you type in "I'm Feeling Lucky" and then hit the "I'm Feeling Lucky" button...will the universe collapse?

EDIT: Yes...mostly because peshmerga made the above post. GG pesh you ruined the universe.
 
Glirk Dient said:
What happens if you type in "I'm Feeling Lucky" and then hit the "I'm Feeling Lucky" button...will the universe collapse?

EDIT: Yes...mostly because peshmerga made the above post. GG pesh you ruined the universe.

...Sorry.
 
TheSomeone said:
Obviously the French are a great world power and a powerful, advanced country.

Not really anymore.

They certainly used to be (they do have one of only five seats on the UN Security Council) but since the end of WWII their power has waned significantly compared to other European countries such as Germany.
 
The french are lovers, not fighters! what did you expect?

PS: The list in the first post is factually incorrect in several places
 
Okay, i'm no history major in fact i suppose i could be quite the opposite with my major being computer engineering. I'm not calling anybody here liars, i totally accept that some of that was probably exaggerated for comical reasons, but could somebody be so kind as to specifically list examples of the false information?
 
xcellerate said:
Okay, i'm no history major in fact i suppose i could be quite the opposite with my major being computer engineering. I'm not calling anybody here liars, i totally accept that some of that was probably exaggerated for comical reasons, but could somebody be so kind as to specifically list examples of the false information?

see wouldn't it have been easier to just say

"fuk that shit nigga"
 
Ok, never mind Charles Martel and Poitiers. That surely didn't count for whoever wrote that cretinism.
 
xcellerate said:
Okay, i'm no history major in fact i suppose i could be quite the opposite with my major being computer engineering. I'm not calling anybody here liars, i totally accept that some of that was probably exaggerated for comical reasons, but could somebody be so kind as to specifically list examples of the false information?

Ooh, ooh! I wanna try!

Hundred Years' War
Assertion: Mostly lost, saved at last by female schizophrenic who inadvertently creates The First Rule of French Warfare; "France's armies are victorious only when not led by a Frenchman." Sainted.
History: War alternates between periods of English and French victories. Joan of Arc helps to increase morale among French troops, and Burgundy's decision to stop fighting France gives the French time to recuperate. The English are driven out of France. [Wikipedia, Columbia Encyclopedia 2001-05]

Italian Wars
Assertion: Lost. France becomes the first and only country to ever lose two wars when fighting Italians.
History: France mostly fought Spain in the Italian Wars, not Italy. The issue of the wars was control of Italy. France did, however, ultimately lose the Italian Wars. [Columbia Encyclopedia 2001-05, Wikipedia]

Etc.
 
There was no War of Revolution.

It was the war of Devolution - it's todo with inheritence etc of Louis XIV's wife :)
 
As many are aware, the French government recently announced a raise in its terror alert level from "Run" to "Hide". The normal level is "General Arrogance", and the only two higher levels in France are "Surrender" and "Collaborate". The rise was precipitated by a recent fire that destroyed France's white flag factory, effectively paralysing the country's military capability.

It's not only the French that are on a heightened level of alert: Italy has increased the alert level from "Shout loudly and excitedly" to "Elaborate military posturing". Two more levels remain, "Ineffective combat operations" and "Change sides".

The Germans also increased their alert state from "Disdain" to "Dress in uniform and sing marching songs". They have two higher levels: "Invade a neighbour" and "Lose".

Seeing this reaction in continental Europe the Americans have gone from "Isolationism" to "Find another oil-rich nation for regime change". Their remaining higher alert states are "Attack random countries (ideally those without any credible military)" and "Beg the British for help".

The British are also feeling the pinch in relation to recent bombings and have raised their security level from "Miffed" to "Peeved". Soon though, security levels may be raised yet again to "Irritated" or even "A Bit Cross". Londoners have not been "A Bit Cross" since the Blitz in 1940 when tea supplies all but ran out. Terrorists have been re-categorized from "Tiresome" to "Bloody Nuisance". The last time the British issued a "Bloody Nuisance" warning level was during the Great Fire of 1666.

Just as an attempt to avoid being yelled at :)(), the above quote is a satire and in no way reflects anything. Obviously.
 
The American military is a laughing stock and relies too much on taking out huge civilian areas with airstrikes are they are too scared to go in and fight man to man. They also lost against a bunch of poor farmers in Vietnam, couldn't beat North Korea without the help of Britain, would only enter World War 1 when they could guarentee a win and then declared themselves sole victor, only won the American Revolution due to France's help and without France's help, America would still be a British colony...if we didn't come to our senses sooner and kick them all out of the commonwealth. American soldiers aren't smart enough to tell whos the badguys and goodguys, so they just shoot everyone randomly. The worst thing an allied soldier could do is get caught between the Americans and the enemy, as then you wouldn't know who to run to.

All Americans are fat, overeaters and are pissed off due to the fact that they chose their smartest person to be president and found out he's as smart as a chimpanzee compared to the average intelligence of Mongolia.

edit: just balancing it out with fallacies about America so just relax and pass this post by with a little laugh and a giggle.
 
bliink said:
Yeah.. if more people were better educated about that, maybe there'd be less threads like this :rolleyes:
oh, you mean off-topic isn't already flooded with threads way more mindless than this ? ;)

oh my goodness jabberwock95, that quote was gold.
 
Why do people have to take the thread so seriously.
I found it pretty funny; even though I know most of it is wrong or manipulated history (ie. France did not lose WW1 or WW2).
Still funny just to have a giggle at French history...but Poland had it worse.
 
xcellerate said:
Okay, i'm no history major in fact i suppose i could be quite the opposite with my major being computer engineering. I'm not calling anybody here liars, i totally accept that some of that was probably exaggerated for comical reasons, but could somebody be so kind as to specifically list examples of the false information?

your attempt at rediculing the french backfired and blew up in your face, as penance you should meticously research each point in that list and state why they are incorrect
 
it did not backfire, nor blow up, just a bunch of people decided to completely ignore the part that it is a joke, and jokes are known to bend the truth.

you people jump over all over something like this, but than you go and love clueless threads like that 'colin at the door' one and the many others, give him a break.
 
Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?

NO IT WASN'T!
 
Back
Top