Maskirovka said:i fully understand your explanation, kyle, but i don't understand how that example proved innervision wrong.
how does the "infinite number of numbers between 14 and 15" example prove that wrong? that was my question.
innervision was saying that because you started counting, your number was already finite. you had a number you started with, and a number you've gotten to so far...therefore at any point in time, the count is not infinite. therefore infinity is a concept that must trancend time.
i understand that the graph of x^.5 starts and doesn't stop, but a normal graph automatically includes all X values...which means it includes the possibility of infinity. innervision was not talking about an cartesian coordinate graph.
damn sorry, guess i was a little tired when i wrote that. i completely misunderstood you
btw that whole "infinite number of numbers between 14 and 15" deal is true. and let's leave time out of this because time is not infinite and never will be infinite no matter how hard you try. to prove there is an infinite number of numbers between 14 and 15 try making the lowest real number that does not equal 14. 14.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000... what is this? you can hold down your 0 key forever without hitting 1 because there will always be a number smaller than that or something like that
also, this has nothing to do with anything but y=x is infinite on a cartesian coordinate graph