Vigilante
Newbie
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2003
- Messages
- 2,660
- Reaction score
- 0
gh0st said:yea were a big ****ing badass elephant.
youre one of those tools that belittle americas involvement in world war 2, just because we didnt have to burn half our country to beat the germans, or lose 20000000 troops. britain was pretty much done for had it not been for our initial support by the "hawkish doves" in our legislature at the time (ie massive aid in the form of ammunition, foodstuffs, construction material, etc), it was all the US and canada (god help us) who switched shit around for europe. russia took care of the east, and i concede that saying either the US or the USSR won alone is ridiculous. but no one likes to hear that commies won. fact is our contribution is far greater because russia fought almost exclusively on one front (the european eastern front) whereas the US fought in southern europe, the pacific, and western europe. plus were way cooler than russia.
additionally russia was only as successful as they were because of our massive assistance granted to them under the lend-lease agreement.
oh yeah, add imperial japan to that list, we pretty much reamed them.
And North Africa...but the British were there too.
Pi Mu Rho said:Also - the Americans never controlled Europe.
We could have.