US-S.Korean alliance to be broken

[15357]

In at the very most, 2009.

**** you Mr. President sob. It's going to take us at the very least 2,000,000,000,000 US dollars (Estimated by the National Defence Intitute)for the next 5 years to be able to cope with this huge hole in our national security. We're going to have to buy everything that the US tripwire has provided for us, and North Korea is going to be really happy that the can push forward their 1950 plans for the communist reunification of the peninsula.

Yeah, we've never even been at DEFCON 5 (peacetime) (currently at DEFCON 3), and I don't know what makes the president think that the commies won't attack. They have a history of aggression since ****ing 1949, for gods sake. Most recently the sinking of our warship in 2002. 12 soldiers shot and grenaded in 2005.... police shot with cyanide bullets in the 90s...


Yeah, **** you, retard son of a b*tch with a 9% approval rating.

 

[DeusExMachina]

We're not leaving until 2012...chill...

And plus, you're always going on and about how great your military is

 

[Remus]

And plus, you're always going on and about how great your military is

Only when backed up by Uncle Sam

Look on the bright side, if the commies do unify Korea, at least you can be the leader of the RESISTANCE!

 

[kirovman]

Yeah, **** you, retard son of a b*tch with a 9% approval rating.

Who are you talking about, Bush, or Des Lynam?

 

[IchI]

Hmmmm, It will be interesting to see what happens. If America do leave and North Korea invade South Korea full scale and take by force. Will America even have the reasorces to suport them?

 

[kirovman]

I don't see America leaving South Korea in a position to be invaded by North Korea tbh.

 

[Gray Fox]

i don't think the us are leaving because sk pres wants them, i think it's to save money and to get more troops where they need them, like the middle east.

 

[15357]

Well, our president's done nothing but bad for the alliance, he even said anti-US speeches in public. He just loooves Kim Jong Il.

 

[Gray Fox]

Well, our president's done nothing but bad for the alliance, he even said anti-US speeches in public. He just loooves Kim Jong Il.

What did he say, because the US certainly deserves to be criticized in certain aspects. And that doesn't necessarily mean he loves Kim, not only that iirc Kim is wants a no war/hostilities treaty or something like that.

In other words easing tension might be a good thing, because it's becoming clear that Kim doesn't want war as much as SK doesn't want. The Cold War is over everywhere else, there is no reason it should not end in Korea too.

 

[Evo]

Maybe he is just fed up with your brutality of dealing with dissent that he will get the US to invade on his last day in office?

 

[Pulse]

Don't you guys have robots the size of skyscrapers over there? Just use them!

 

[Baal]

Since when did the occupation of S. Korea by the USA become a welcome friendship by the S. Koreans?

I thought you guys were sick of the Americans on your turf.

 

[Anthraxxx]

[email protected]a

When the US leaves S.Korea, you'd better hope that all the artillery pointed at S.Korea is too rusty to work. GG, zerg rush.

 

[kirovman]

Well, our president's done nothing but bad for the alliance, he even said anti-US speeches in public. He just loooves Kim Jong Il.

What's wrong with you, thought criminal?

You should be praising your president, he is the supreme leader of the fatherland!

 

[Adabiviak]

...didn't know we were pulling out. It doesn't seem to me like N. Korea would make a move on S. Korea (but I haven't the foggiest notion of the current political climate there). It seems like the UN would step up to the plate and help in this case though?

 

[63]

Haha @ UN.

 

[15357]

What did he say, because the US certainly deserves to be criticized in certain aspects. And that doesn't necessarily mean he loves Kim, not only that iirc Kim is wants a no war/hostilities treaty or something like that.

In other words easing tension might be a good thing, because it's becoming clear that Kim doesn't want war as much as SK doesn't want. The Cold War is over everywhere else, there is no reason it should not end in Korea too.

Kim cannot sign a peace treaty, because his standing forces will have no more reason to exist, and the higher officers might rebel. Also, our pres is always going on and on about how everything is the US's fault, including the NK nuke test.

Well, the US has been the only reason that the North hasn't attacked. Now they have nukes, and without the US, they'll probably have more influence in threatening us and influencing our policies, at the very least. They call us and say "WE WILL DESTROY YOUR CAPITOL IN A SEA OF FIE!" every year or so. Like a new year greeting.

[email protected]a

When the US leaves S.Korea, you'd better hope that all the artillery pointed at S.Korea is too rusty to work. GG, zerg rush.

Exactly.

What's wrong with you, thought criminal?

You should be praising your president, he is the supreme leader of the fatherland!

Nah, he's more like the puppet of the Inside Group.

...didn't know we were pulling out. It doesn't seem to me like N. Korea would make a move on S. Korea (but I haven't the foggiest notion of the current political climate there). It seems like the UN would step up to the plate and help in this case though?

You don't point 20,000 artillery and missles at somebody else's capital for no reason.

 

[Cole]

Alliance or no Alliance. The U.S. will protect any democratic nation. If they invade, the U.S. would respond.

 

[Jintor]

Effectively?

 

[Geogaddi]

I'm not to worried about you guys. You have some of the world's most brilliant tacticians thanks to Starcraft.

 

[CptStern]

North Korea is going to be really happy that the can push forward their 1950 plans for the communist reunification of the peninsula.

so by 2009 I should start calling you Comrade Numbers?

 

[Ridge]

It seems like the UN would step up to the plate and help in this case though?

What a damn laugh! The UN is a bunch of pussies. When the "UN sends in troops" It means the UN sent in the US military...I say we leave the UN and see how they deal with everything then...

 

[Baal]

Effectively?

And end in occupation.

And I can't help but remember Katrina when thinking about US government response times.

 

[DEATHMASTER]

Only when backed up by Uncle Sam

Look on the bright side, if the commies do unify Korea, at least you can be the leader of the RESISTANCE!

Don't forget, this is no combine, these are the commies

 

[Krynn72]

All part of the plan. The US leaves, N.Korea goes "omg dey are undefended!" and attacks. Then the US goes "Oh shit! N.Korea has WMDs and are in a war! We must go in and destroy their country!"

When all is said and done... multiple WMDs are launched before the US gets there, and nuclear fallout makes multiple nations rely on US support, thus improving the republican's approval ratings for next election.


HAH, bet you didnt expect that ending!

 

[Jintor]

To get the good ending, you have to control at least half of the senate AND be in good diplomating standing with North Korea before D-Day.

 

[Angry Lawyer]

I'm not to worried about you guys. You have some of the world's most brilliant tacticians thanks to Starcraft.

That tickles me

-Angry Lawyer

 

[DeusExMachina]

What a damn laugh! The UN is a bunch of pussies. When the "UN sends in troops" It means the UN sent in the US military...I say we leave the UN and see how they deal with everything then...

The UN would just employ PMCs. They'd probably do a more effective job too.