Water Mark 3D

[Black-Falcon]

Is that program to be taken sereously? Or should I just shun it? Because I got a 23, 773 on it with a
-Radeon 9500 Pro
-768MB of RAM
-2.0GHz P4
-Audigy Gamer

 

[SidewinderX]

it's a great progrma.... it jsut score diffrently than other programs do.

 

[Shuzer]

I got 35,134 (or somewhere near it) on my system, I believe (see sig)

 

[KiNG]

yea its actually a good program to benchmark with, along with 3dmark03 and 3dmark01. just some people feel that artifical benchmarks suck because the scored low due to haveing errors or complications with their system being buggered up for one reason or another...u dont just score bad because the program doesnt like u.

 

[gsibble]

See Sig.

 

[mrk]

you mean aquamark 3?

yah its better than 3dmark and its an ACTUAL ingame engine not a synbthetic benchmark like 3dmark so its way more acurate for performance comparison, yo can also see exactly what rendering methods your system is lacking in because it tells you what is being rendered whilst benching.

I get 26K with my setup -

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=80253616
(note, DDR2100 memory and KT266a chipset) I got the 2nd highest score for my spec range and the 1st highest is a guy with same spec but faster chipset and 3000+xp

 

[slap]

Quote.."(note, DDR2100 memory and KT266a chipset) I got the 2nd highest score for my spec range and the 1st highest is a guy with same spec but faster chipset and 3000+xp"

I have an almost Identical system to yours and only get 12000 ish on Aquamark.. How on gods earth are you getting 26000..?Sounds fishy to me..!!

 

[Aaron]

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=779217572

i like it more than 3dmark - bigger difference in results, more accurate. And the score is ur fps so its realistic, not like saying 6k in 3dmark03.