seinfeldrules
Newbie
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2003
- Messages
- 3,385
- Reaction score
- 0
Stern it was a friggin joke. Jesus he didnt think he was on camera. You really need to take a nice sip of reality.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
He can only sip reality if it is biased and liberal...which isn't reality at all but to him it is.seinfeldrules said:Stern it was a friggin joke. Jesus he didnt think he was on camera. You really need to take a nice sip of reality.
actually, what i think you want is people "discussing" less.. or at least a more focused discussion, which the game release would probably bring about. the problem with the OT forum is that you get a bunch of FPS players coming here and seeing that they can give free reign to all of their sophomoric website-knowledge and inexperience. it's funny if you're in the right frame of mind, but it can be tiresome if you're not.not28 said:maybe we'll have something to actually discuss when the game gets released.
seinfeldrules said:Stern it was a friggin joke. Jesus he didnt think he was on camera. You really need to take a nice sip of reality.
If you are the president, the person who is seen to make all decisions (but actually doesn't), don't you think you have some responsibility to keep a seriousness about a situation which could end the world? Sure, he didn't think the mic was on, but it's not worth even chancing it.
seinfeldrules said:Wait, so because he is the President he can no longer joke and act like a human being? Wow, I didnt think we voted aliens into the White House. The context in which he said it was obviously a joke. "Congress has just outlawed Russia. The nukes will be falling in five minutes". Then again, since you are obvioulsy a supporter of Mr. Pessimism (Kerry), this optimism and joking must come as a shock to you.
CptStern said:I've been here a little over a month and even I noticed that every single topic that even remotely talks about politics gets bogged down in little nitpicking by page 2. So much so that no one seems to even read anybody elses post; they just latch on to one statement and spend the next 5 pages arguing the same point over and over
I think Reagan & Pals should have been a bit more concerned that the joke might lose something during translation to Russian.
And sure he can act & joke like a human being, but that was definitely the wrong time, place and subject, especially given the international situation.
at the pessimism kerry thing, did you pull that straight from the bush commercial or what?
seinfeldrules said:Well does it really matter? It seems he did have the right approach considering the outcome 8 months after he left office, but then again nobody recalls that right?
Link please.CptStern said:he once refered to the Contra Rebels as the "moral equivelant of the [american] founding fathers"
just google it.. it's a well-known quote. i believe he said the same about the mujaheddin in afghanistan (the proto-taliban). though i'm not sure what this has to do with this thread.. in fact, wth is this thread about anyway?Foxtrot said:Link please.
That is true, but the founding fathers were more like diplomats than warriors, for the most part.Lil' Timmy said:just google it.. it's a well-known quote. i believe he said the same about the mujahadin in afghanistan (the proto-taliban). though i'm not sure what this has to do with this thread.. in fact, wth is this thread about anyway?
edit: in many ways, reagan was right. both can be viewed as freedom-fighters, just like pretty much any group of rebels (they can also be viewed as terrorists.. just depends on your POV). the american rebels ('founding fathers') certainly weren't above terrorism and "war crime" in the fight against the british.
I remember that, I just don't think it had anything to do with his approach, but Gorbachev was a much, much more important factor in ending the Cold War than Reagan was.seinfeldrules said:Well does it really matter? It seems he did have the right approach considering the outcome 8 months after he left office, but then again nobody recalls that right?
well, one could argue that the financial expenditure poured into the afghan conflict assisted the collapse of the soviet union. our assistance to the mujaheddin certainly had somehting to do with their ultimate victory.. of course, it kinda came back to bite us in the ass.. but that's a different topic (or is it??)Eejit said:I remember that, I just don't think it had anything to do with his approach, but Gorbachev was a much, much more important factor in ending the Cold War than Reagan was.
Do you actually think he could have brought it about with Andropov or Chernenko in power? If it was one of them his attitudes would probably have prolonged the conflict, with his 'evil empire' speeches etc.
well, any group of rebels will have soldiers and able 'diplomats' (just look at the southern successionists in the US civil war). whether they become "founding fathers" or not depends upon the success of the rebellion. had the british and loyalist americans won, washington would be regarded something like jefferson davis.Foxtrot said:That is true, but the founding fathers were more like diplomats than warriors, for the most part.
Dalamari said:Nuclear war not involving me=hilarious