what does this mean?

bizzy420

Newbie
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
Messages
601
Reaction score
0
In addition, those of you with soft audio solutions or sound cards that lack dedicated hardware acceleration for DirectSound streams may want to upgrade your audio subsystem for Half-Life 2, as you may not want to give up precious CPU cycles for audio processing. Aureal owners witnessed this firsthand with the original Half-Life.

what does that mean? i got a crappy sb live 5.1 digital, and i dont know what they mean about that cpu cycles thing. can someone explain?
 
i got a sound audigy 2 platinum so i shouldnt be worried. But for people that use for example a soundcard thats built onto a motherboard (nforce sound) it uses more cpu cycles to process audio then a sound audigy 2 thats more easy on the cpu.
 
Yeah but if youve got an nforce mobo, you shouldnt need to worry about mispent cycles. Whats that avatar from tork, i have a feeling i have seen it somehwere.....
 
Originally posted by Tork
i got a sound audigy 2 platinum so i shouldnt be worried. But for people that use for example a soundcard thats built onto a motherboard (nforce sound) it uses more cpu cycles to process audio then a sound audigy 2 thats more easy on the cpu.
Actually SoundStorm (Nforce2 MCP-T) uses far fewer CPU cycles than Audigy 2.
 
hmm im not sure if its the same one you're talking about but they are very close.

http://firingsquad.gamers.com/hardware/audigy2_versus_nforce2/page5.asp

When you compare the two sets of numbers, it seems that the nForce2 has about 3% CPU usage overhead (recall that this is on a Duron 950).

As the number of streams increase, however, the nForce2 starts to catch up.


Audigy 2 Pro's

Low CPU utilization
The numbers speak for themselves
 
i got both of them audigy 2 and a nforce2 built onto my a7n8x ive installed one and the other and i seriously cannot tell any difference they are very close. I shouldnt of used a nforce2 as a example since it will work just fine, this is for older sound cards.
 
Im stuck with an SBVibra 128 and i couldnt really care.
 
It's not a thing to worry about if your machine is capable of running HL2 at a decent rate, we are talking maybe a 5-10fps loss at most.

It's only really a problem in low end (sub 1ghz) machines and very badly engineered cards and drivers.
 
What about an Asus mobo with a built-in Yamaha soundcard (dont laugh), will that affect me a lot?
 
With the exception of the Nforce 1 & 2, onboard soundcards normally depend upon the CPU to do all of the processing and generally have the highest overhead of all.
 
only real way to tell us to run benchmarks with your onboard and one with a high end audigy card
 
I also have a SoundBlaster 5.1 Digital and can safely say its a great stable sound card.. Works well with all games and should work just fine for HL2...no worries..!
 
Is a NF7-S a nForce mobo? Thats the one I'm thinking of getting, as I have no working sound card
 
Originally posted by ice101
Is a NF7-S a nForce mobo? Thats the one I'm thinking of getting, as I have no working sound card

yeah one of the best nforce2 motherboards out there.
 
Originally posted by Tork
hmm im not sure if its the same one you're talking about but they are very close.

http://firingsquad.gamers.com/hardware/audigy2_versus_nforce2/page5.asp

When you compare the two sets of numbers, it seems that the nForce2 has about 3% CPU usage overhead (recall that this is on a Duron 950).

As the number of streams increase, however, the nForce2 starts to catch up.


Audigy 2 Pro's

Low CPU utilization
The numbers speak for themselves
Ah, well, its low... Playing music yeilds 0% CPU usage for me anyway :)
 
how much cpu usage is a SB LIVE VALUE? for say 12 audio sreams under directsound ?
 
Back
Top