What fps is acceptable to you

[The Mullinator]

A constant 30 and I am happy.

 

[Mr. Redundant]

I can deal with 60fps as long as it is constant, anything below and I start getting angry (but all my cash goes into my PC, so I have good reason for doing so)

 

[mayfer]

AF really lowers the fps.. i don't use AF.
1280x1024 4xAA - 50fps should be more than enough.

40 (or maybe 30) fps is ok for single player. fo MP i prefer 50+.

 

[Dynasty]

well i get 80-120fps with 1024, 2x AF, 4XAA and maxed out settings...so im pretty pleased :E

 

[The Monkey]

70 is good.

 

[John Romero]

30 aparently i have to add more shit before i can post cuz the number thirty isnt long enough.

 

[sHm0zY]

60- 30

 

[umop]

80 and up

 

[Ruroni]

70fps+ is nice and smooth.

50 and below and I notice a difference and just deal with it(unless its under 30)

 

[Haku666]

maxxed fps with v-sync so its 85hz on monitor so it must be 85fps. No way u can turn v-sync off. jittery rubbish sucks. and yeah buying new graphics card now is waste of money cos just about now they are going to bring new cards in so lol why to buy already old card when after a month or 2 ur going to get much better with the same prize lol.

btw im not worried, im buying new comp in march. My specs: amd 2100+, radeon 8500, 512mb = 20~60fps in cs:s. And collectors edition pre-ordered. so call me a bitch but im buying the game and playing the hacked.

ps: there will be coming new ati r520 wich is 6x radeon 9800 or so they say <3 wich is why im buying the comp in march cos I want maxxxed eye-candy in all sized maps <3 . Cos i know there will be awesome, big and very detailed maps coming so i want the eye-candy in those too with 85fps. Correct me if i am wrong in the r520 case its just what i have readed in 'the inquirer'

 

[genocide604]

well i have to handle playin mp with 20... until i can upgrade my mobo, and pcu