What happens during a second U.S. civil war?

It's not really about how likely it is... it's about if it happens. There's so much talk about it... all the cons saying they're going to revolt and overthrow the government because some black man is acting quite like the previous president.
 
It's not really about how likely it is... it's about if it happens. There's so much talk about it... all the cons saying they're going to revolt and overthrow the government because some black man is acting quite like the previous president.
Seriously Raz, this is quite funny. You mean 'conservatives' right? For a second I thought 'convicts'. Just re-read, look at the underlined statements and think 'convicts'.
 
Seriously Raz, this is quite funny. You mean 'conservatives' right? For a second I thought 'convicts'. Just re-read, look at the underlined statements and think 'convicts'.

Cons of course meaning conservatives. And the black man comment is because they're making a big deal about what Obama is doing when it's not anything Bush hasn't already done. So it has to be about something else... and I like playing the race card...
 
I believe that the age of wars on the West has ended about the same time the Cold War did.The West has just matured so much and it would be quite weird if another war started.Yes , there are some differences between the American North and South , but i think that a Jericho-esque scenario is highly unlikely.
 
Cons of course meaning conservatives. And the black man comment is because they're making a big deal about what Obama is doing when it's not anything Bush hasn't already done. So it has to be about something else... and I like playing the race card...
Of course you do Raz. Ya so crazeh!
 
The only way an overthrow of the government could possibly work is if both sides were in on it.

A civil war would get shutdown so quickly by the military.
 
If you look at history (such as in Ancient Rome), the military traditionally supports whatever side will benefit it the most, either through increased pay or better benefits. Which side of the political spectrum sounds more likely to give them that?

Without the support of at least a large portion of the military, any revolution would not succeed.
 
The military could just as easily split, with different generals and different state armies taking their divisions away from central control.

Also, individual units could break down and split away if the war was over an issue divisive enough.
 
This is what would happen.

We would split into separate nation-states. Most of the nation's armed forces would go to the right, and most of the nation's acting ability would go to the left. Those who owned all the banks and big companies would form a third state called New Switzembourg.

Not long after the split, the right state would take a zillion tanks and bombs painted with rebel flags and FairTax stickers, and crush the left state while the lefties were busy dancing in flowery fields with Ethically Treated chicken and anchovies which were all given equal wealth.

In retrospect, we (being the hidden fourth state) will see that the invasion of the lefties by the righties was probably the most humane solution since the lefties would have collapsed anyway since they produced absolutely nothing of value. The righties will eventually degrade into a bizarre hybrid of religious anarchy and each person will effectively own their own nation in their backyard.
 
I think that we are too politically inclined for any conflict to lead to true civil war; we all know that if we fought North against South or East against West it would lead to nothing but a big smoking crater across North America.
 
Whatever happens, USA is up for grabs and another colonization.
 
Everyone I know here in the south is like "LOL DEY TAKE OUR GUNS WE GONNA KILL SOME ****ERS DEY NOT TAKE OUR GUNS".


I see it playing out like that. Rednecks and black people staring riots.


















F*ck yeah, then black people can REALLY seize power.
 
Back
Top