Why dont they blow up...

KoreBolteR

Tank
Joined
Oct 8, 2004
Messages
3,724
Reaction score
1
Why dont they blow up the al-jazeera news building, its obviously causing hatred against the trrops trying to secure peace, im sure al-jazeera has fueled more hatred for the west....
evacuate the building, and blow it up, put it out of buisness! :thumbs:
 
I think i speak for myself, innervision and cptstern when i say, i agree with this man
 
good question. I wonder when are they going to do that.
not that I support it thu, i love aljazeera. <sarcasm>I think it's FOX that needs to be bombed to the ground :p </sarcasm> the are nothing but a propaganda tool. everyone in the world thinks that, except the ones who watch FOX.

btw, is it just me, or does google news not consider fox a news source? I mean, they take news from every random website that claims to provide news, but they don't have fox .. heheh!
 
sigh, do you just sit around dreaming up topics that'll be sure to start a flame war? There are half a dozen topics on this page alone that talks about this
 
But the Americans who are in Iraq believe in freedom of speech and press.
To foster that belief means you dont impose anything other than that on anyone.

Also, use google for news.. its the least biased because it provides a better balance..
eg, Fox is on one end saying that "The evil left wind liberal's are planning a terrorist attack on our freedoms and democracy cos they're all commie terrorists"
and on the other end you've got some hippy ranting about how "the corporate machine is oiled with the blood of the workers"

then, you can form your own middle ground opinion.
 
bliink said:
But the Americans who are in Iraq believe in freedom of speech and press.
To foster that belief means you dont impose anything other than that on anyone.
Shouldn't the discussion be closed after that remark? You've basically answering his question and he can't retaliate, end of discussion. Unless he wants to backtrack into Facism.
 
KoreBolteR said:
WHICH MEANS MORE ENGLISH SPEAKING TERRORISTS WILL BE RECRUITED, ignore the caps :p

ya cuz that's why aljazeera exists ..as a recruiting camp for terrorists :upstare: I guess you could say the same for fox, except it recruits the uber-patriotic ..the same that lap up anything that spews out of bush's mouth regardless if it's the truth
 
the only people ruining this world are the terrorists!
the recruitment amount is gettin beyond with al-jazeera being on the air, as the terrorists can lie thier asses off to LURE people to join them and then.. blow themselves up, and kill innocent people.. :/ . thats just stupid
 
Yeah, we should bomb them. We should also round up and execute all unpatriotic dissenters that think lowly of the war. Kerry should be assassinated because there's no telling if he's going to plant a bomb in the White House out of rage for his loss. We should also start screening published articles containing blasphem... *Ahem* I mean dissension regarding our President and our troops. Then we should go to the CNN offices and put poisonous gas into the ventilation system, because those people are endangering the lives of US troops with their liberal slant. Hell, we should kill everybody EXCEPT the people actually pulling the triggers and killing our boys.

I'm looking out my window and I see this guy across the street. He looks kind of suspicious and he's got shifty eyes. I think I'm going to go over there and bash his skull open with a lead pipe since he's probably a Commie agent from the underground Soviet Union sent to subvert the United States.
 
ya cuz the bush admin is the epitomy of honesty :upstare:

"We have sources that tell us that Saddam Hussein recently authorized Iraqi field commanders to use chemical weapons -- the very weapons the dictator tells us he does not have."

George Bush February 8, 2003
 
gh0st said:
I think i speak for myself, innervision and cptstern when i say, i agree with this man

Well I don't particularly like al jazeera television, and the way they do buisness. I don't think we should blow them up though, doing that will just add more fuel to the fire so to speak.

Think about that for a second.. People who hate the west watch alj... the west destroys alj, suddenly everything they had heard from alj becomes %100 correct because the west wanted them silenced.

I think we should start a campaigne to discredit them however, and I don't have a problem with that. Anything to curb the violence in that region will make me happy.
 
blowing up aljeezera is about as good an idea as nuking the entire middle east :rolleyes:
 
meh they tried to blow up them up before ...hmmm I wonder why? if they were afraid they were telling lies then they had nothing to worry about cuz the truth would set them free ..but if they are telling the truth then the US would have a legitamate reason for bombing them: plugging up holes in the propaganda machine
 
No no, we need to capture them and the emplyers of fox to, let them loos on an Island, like in Battle Royale. :)
 
They don't recruit terrorists at all.

If by terrorist, you mean "someone who listens to the opinions of other sources".
 
Fox? Why the hell not. Make sure you enslave the makers of the simpsons so you can crank out a couple more seasons while youre at it.
 
KoreBolteR said:
WHICH MEANS MORE ENGLISH SPEAKING TERRORISTS WILL BE RECRUITED, ignore the caps :p
Terrorists are bad. But terrorists that speak the same language as us!? Well, that's just disgusting! We'll have terrorists that look like us next... :hmph:
 
hmmmmm timothy mcVeigh was a terrorist ..and he spoke english!! and he was a white guy!!! plus he looked like one of us/them/they!!!! what's next? little old italian ladies with bombs strapped to their midsections screaming "vive la resistance!" before they take out half of manhattan???!!! :eek:
 
el Chi said:
Shouldn't the discussion be closed after that remark? You've basically answering his question and he can't retaliate, end of discussion. Unless he wants to backtrack into Facism.

aha, but if I did that, and still claimed I was a member of a democracy, I would be contradicting myself. As long as a discussion is useful/contributive it can remain open. (thats a forum rule, not a political one :p)
 
bliink said:
aha, but if I did that, and still claimed I was a member of a democracy, I would be contradicting myself. As long as a discussion is useful/contributive it can remain open. (thats a forum rule, not a political one :p)


I say down with the system.
 
Innervision961 said:
Well I don't particularly like al jazeera television, and the way they do buisness. I don't think we should blow them up though, doing that will just add more fuel to the fire so to speak.

Think about that for a second.. People who hate the west watch alj... the west destroys alj, suddenly everything they had heard from alj becomes %100 correct because the west wanted them silenced.

I think we should start a campaigne to discredit them however, and I don't have a problem with that. Anything to curb the violence in that region will make me happy.

OH NOES!!11! People are getting a second side to the story!111 Bomb them before people realize this!!11
 
if you blew it up after u evacuated all the people, they will just find some cave and start filming shit. dont evacuate anyone.
 
Kangy said:
They don't recruit terrorists at all.

If by terrorist, you mean "someone who listens to the opinions of other sources".

they HELP recruit terrorists...
 
KoreBolteR said:
they HELP recruit terrorists...

Ok, for your information.. theres no single 'terrorist army' that someone goes and signs up for.
This is what "terrorist" means:
"the characteristic of someone who employs terrorism (especially as a political weapon); "terrorist activity"; "terrorist state" n : a radical who employs terror as a political weapon"

Therefore, if aljazeera generates enough political feeling to provoke such activity, then they are incititing violence, however, FOXNews does the exact same thing as aljazeera, sure, they use different styles, but the end result is the same.
Both of them are propaganda outlets, neither are reliable sources of information as they only seek to promote their own extremist and fanatical perspectives.
 
I was sitting down, watching TV the other day when suddenly this english speaking terrorist came on! He said; America suck for bombing Iraq - kill them.

So naturally I strapped a bomb to myself...etc etc.

God the idea of democracy has fallen apart. If some of you don't see that there are infact two sides to this war. America being by far the most evil in terms of civilian death and damage done. Terrorists tend to spring up when their way of life is endangered by other folk. They resort to desperate methods to allow them to go on living how they wish.

I hate war. Not only do many many people get killed unecessarily but it shows how stupid some other folk are.
 
There is a movie about aljazeera, called Control Room, I havn't seen it but I hear it's good.
 
KoreBolteR said:
they HELP recruit terrorists...


Unless this is some attempt at humour, please, grow up.

Do you really know what they're doing on their channel? Tell me how you know they're "recruiting terrorists". Give us one piece of evidence the rest of this thread need to see before you make such claims.
 
everybody who doesn't speak arabic can't judge aljazeera really ..
except from their english website.
but the english website's content is not identical to the arabic one nor is it identical to their tv channel, the contents are a little bit "customized" for western readers.
 
Kangy said:
Unless this is some attempt at humour, please, grow up.

Do you really know what they're doing on their channel? Tell me how you know they're "recruiting terrorists". Give us one piece of evidence the rest of this thread need to see before you make such claims.

LOL do you think im joking?!
they always show beheadings on that channel, dissing everything that the west do..

what else, oh ye, broadcast the pleas of terrorists to join al-qaeda etc..

if al jazeera didnt broadcast these "come join al-qaeda" programmes nobody would have the ideas/ would be INFLUENCED to join.
 
KoreBolteR said:
LOL do you think im joking?!
they always show beheadings on that channel, dissing everything that the west do..

what else, oh ye, broadcast the pleas of terrorists to join al-qaeda etc..

if al jazeera didnt broadcast these "come join al-qaeda" programmes nobody would have the ideas/ would be INFLUENCED to join.


Flying apeshit indeed!

They're showing those beheadings because nobody else will. Don't you think that beheadings are oh, I don't know, A SYMBOL OF BRUTAL DISREGARD FOR HUMAN LIFE, not a recruitment tool? They've never broadcasted a plea for people to join terrorist organisations.

Get your facts straight, remove the blind patriotism from your ass and then try to argue with some decency.
 
u well know that there will be a lot of people who hate the west in the middle east, who watch al jazeera, watch the beheadings of westerners, hell even ANYBODY. and still want to join.
mate you gotta know the world your living in, its goin on day after day i assure you. and the UN BLOOD MONEY is in the hands of 1 of the terrorists leaders as it helps them buy weapons against the peace forces/coalition
 
KoreBolteR said:
u well know that there will be a lot of people who hate the west in the middle east, who watch al jazeera, watch the beheadings of westerners, hell even ANYBODY. and still want to join.
mate you gotta know the world your living in, its goin on day after day i assure you. and the UN BLOOD MONEY is in the hands of 1 of the terrorists leaders as it helps them buy weapons against the peace forces/coalition

Haharr! Like heck UN give money to terrorists. Al Jazeera show beheadings without the intention of saying "lookit, we got them westerners!" and they're probably one of the least biased outside of some of the less opressive regimes.

Face it, Al Jazeera have no intention of converting people to a cause they don't even represent.
 
Kangy said:
Haharr! Like heck UN give money to terrorists. Al Jazeera show beheadings without the intention of saying "lookit, we got them westerners!" and they're probably one of the least biased outside of some of the less opressive regimes.

Face it, Al Jazeera have no intention of converting people to a cause they don't even represent.

OMG are you living on this planet?!?!
the UN gave the money (billions) to saddam ages ago to give to the people of iraq,, for food etc, and saddam gave it too the terrorists and spent it on his military!

im sure theres a lot of corruption going on between UN, france and russia, as they all hate the west (america)

the UN even KNEW what saddam was spending it on, but didnt do a thing about it..so i heared
 
KoreBolteR said:
OMG are you living on this planet?!?!
the UN gave the money (billions) to saddam ages ago to give to the people of iraq,, for food etc, and saddam gave it too the terrorists and spent it on his military!

im sure theres a lot of corruption going on between UN, france and russia, as they all hate the west (america)

the UN even KNEW what saddam was spending it on, but didnt do a thing about it..so i heared

So you heard. So did the US, in fact, the US gave him those elusive weapons of mass destruction (which he used against Iran...without US intervention! O Joyous Day!) as well as kitting out his entire army. Oh, and if the UN gives money away, it's for a genuine humanitarian cause, and they had no idea he'd do that. Saddam has no links to terrorists, either.

:)
 
Kangy said:
So you heard. So did the US, in fact, the US gave him those elusive weapons of mass destruction (which he used against Iran...without US intervention! O Joyous Day!) as well as kitting out his entire army. Oh, and if the UN gives money away, it's for a genuine humanitarian cause, and they had no idea he'd do that. Saddam has no links to terrorists, either.

:)

when i said "so i heard i only meant that for the last line i wrote, everything else is still true watever you say.
look, think about this, if the terrorists didnt attack america on 9/11 in the first place, the usa woudnt have gone to afghanistan or iraq...

therefore more people would have been terrorised by the saddam regime or the taliban, or al-qaeda. and WHAt , saddam has no links to terrorists?! are you mad!! hes a Terorist himself, look what he did to the kurds and even the iranians back a decade ago.. back to the point, if al-jazeera wasnt broadcasing, al-qaeda would be able to broadcast thier lies, therefore recruit less people, therefore smaller army of suicide bombers!...

i rest my case, lol
 
KoreBolteR said:
OMG are you living on this planet?!?!
the UN gave the money (billions) to saddam ages ago to give to the people of iraq,, for food etc, and saddam gave it too the terrorists and spent it on his military!

im sure theres a lot of corruption going on between UN, france and russia, as they all hate the west (america)

the UN even KNEW what saddam was spending it on, but didnt do a thing about it..so i heared

The US gave saddam billions just before the gulf. I'm sure that helped him along with any weapons he wanted. Saddam would kill any terrorists operating in his country, they are a threat to his power. He killed family who opposed him, do you think he would let terrorists get away with it.

America gave Osama $1bn for weapons and training.

Saddam does (or did) have the right to buy weapons u know. He is allowed to have an army. It's BS, like Iran now, not being allowed to start any uranium programs for fear they might build nukes. Why can't they have nukes and America and UK can? I personally wudnt trust America with a firecracker.
 
look, you know iran WILL make nukes, while UK and US will keep them out of TERRORIST hands like IRAN.

what america need to do are fly them into space so no country can have them imo! fs

and since when did america give osama $1 billion, not according to the Clinton biography.. explain plz, lol
 
Back
Top