burner69
Newbie
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2004
- Messages
- 1,587
- Reaction score
- 0
KoreBolteR said:when i said "so i heard i only meant that for the last line i wrote, everything else is still true watever you say.
look, think about this, if the terrorists didnt attack america on 9/11 in the first place, the usa woudnt have gone to afghanistan or iraq...
therefore more people would have been terrorised by the saddam regime or the taliban, or al-qaeda. and WHAt , saddam has no links to terrorists?! are you mad!! hes a Terorist himself, look what he did to the kurds and even the iranians back a decade ago.. back to the point, if al-jazeera wasnt broadcasing, al-qaeda would be able to broadcast thier lies, therefore recruit less people, therefore smaller army of suicide bombers!...
i rest my case, lol
Your case rises up again, displeased with it's burial.
Stop thinking 9/11 was the start of it. It takes a lot to drive a man to crash a plane into a building; they didn't chant "Death to America" for no reason, they have good reason to hate the US. They've been ****ed in the ass by the US many many times.
And so 9/11 happened that made it ok to totally arse up two countries. Admittedly Iraq is better off in some respects, but is still totally f**ked. Afghan is in tatters, all for the sake of trying to please the American people by catching the small minority who are terrorists.
Al Quaeda and Saddam are NOT linked. Ok? NOT LINKED? Saddam wanted them dead. THREAT TO HIS POWER.