No Limit
Party Escort Bot
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2003
- Messages
- 9,018
- Reaction score
- 1
This is the accusation against him by one of the women. That while they were having consensual sex the condom broke and Assanage didn't tell her but kept going. This women was so traumatized by this event that she bragged about it on the internet the next day.
http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/02...the-swedes-are-making-it-up-as-they-go-along/
Seriously. What the **** Sweden?
Yesterday CNN spent most of the day on these rape charges. How much time did they spend on the actual content of the leaks when they came out? Almost none. And the ones they did concentrate on weren't actually newsworthy but were gossip.
Anyone as angry about this shit as I am?
Apparently having consensual sex in Sweden without a condom is punishable by a term of imprisonment of a minimum of two years for rape. That is the basis for a reinstitution of rape charges against WikiLeaks figurehead Julian Assange that is destined to make Sweden and its justice system the laughing stock of the world and dramatically damage its reputation as a model of modernity.
...
Sweden’s Public Prosecutor’s Office was embarrassed in August this year when it leaked to the media that it was seeking to arrest Assange for rape, then on the same day withdrew the arrest warrant because in its own words there was “no evidence”.
...
The women here are near to and over 30 and have international experience, some of it working in Swedish government embassies. There is no suggestion of drugs nor identity concealment. Far from it. Both women boasted of their celebrity connection to Assange after the events that they would now see him destroyed for
...
But then neither Arden nor Wilén complained to the police but rather “sought advice”, a technique in Sweden enabling citizens to avoid just punishment for making false complaints. They sought advice together, having collaborated and irrevocably tainted each other’s evidence beforehand. Their SMS texts to each other show a plan to contact the Swedish newspaper Expressen beforehand in order to maximise the damage to Assange.
...
A great deal more damning evidence is yet to be revealed about what passes for legal process in Sweden, such as Assange’s lawyers having not received a single official document until November 18, 2010 (and then in Swedish language contrary to European Law) and having to learn about the status of investigations through prosecution media announcements but make no mistake: it is not Julian Assange that is on trial here but Sweden and its reputation as a modern and model country with rules of law.
http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/02...the-swedes-are-making-it-up-as-they-go-along/
Seriously. What the **** Sweden?
Yesterday CNN spent most of the day on these rape charges. How much time did they spend on the actual content of the leaks when they came out? Almost none. And the ones they did concentrate on weren't actually newsworthy but were gossip.
Anyone as angry about this shit as I am?